DSLR Lens Reviews


We have used a lot of DSLR lenses over the past few years, and have generally found that third party lenses (with the exception of the 50mm f/1.8 that both Canon and Nikon make) are the best way to go if you’re on a budget and first party lenses are best if you aren’t constrained by a budget or want the best quality money can buy. The third party lens reviews here apply equally for use on both Nikon and Canon bodies (as well as any other mount in which the lens is made), so don’t overlook these reviews just because you use Canon! They apply equally to Canon users.

You will notice most of the reviews here are in the 7-10/10 range, and might think we’re inflating scores. This is not the case. I only review lenses here that I have personally tried, and I read extensively about any lens before trying it in an effort to weed out the junk. Plus, remember that 7/10 is a 70%, which would be a C- by most accounts. Would your parents have been proud of you for earning a C-?! I don’t quite consider the lenses I’m giving 7/10 scores here ‘C-‘ lenses, but you get the idea…

If you would like advice on other lenses, please feel free to leave your question in the comments.

DSC_0027 as Smart Object-1 copy

Crop Sensor Lens Reviews

In case you’re unfamiliar with the term, crop sensor DSLRs utilize a smaller image sensor than full frame or standard 35mm film cameras. All entry level DSLR cameras are crop sensor, as are most consumer level cameras. If you don’t know whether your DSLR is a crop sensor or full frame, there’s a 99% chance it’s crop sensor. Crop sensor cameras can also use full frame lenses, so really, any lens on this page is an option if you have a crop sensor camera.

Nikon 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G AF-S VR II Lens – Often described as the “jack of all trades, master of none” this is really a great lens for a beginner looking for more range than the kit lens offers. Once you get more and more into photography, you’ll probably use this less and less, but it’s still a great option when traveling light. It’s not as sharp and it does have its flaws, but don’t let the gear-snobs fool you–you can get great shots with this lens. (Read Our Full Review w/ Photo Samples) Score: 7/10

Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6G AF-S VR Lens - If you purchased your entry-level camera with the “kit” lens (18-55mm), want more ‘zoom’, and only have a $200 budget, this is the lens for you. It’s not perfect, but it’s fairly sharp and gives you additional zoom for only around $175. Score: 7.5/10

Tamron AF 70-200mm f/2.8 Lens -At less than a third of the price of the Nikon version, the Tamron offers great bang-for-buck. It’s incredibly sharp and well-built. The only negative is that it does not have vibration reduction or any sort of image stabilization, which is very useful for a lens like this. If you’re shooting in broad daylight, you won’t miss it, though. Overall a great lens, and the added advantage of macro really pushes it over the top. Score: 8/10

Nikon 50mm f/1.8D AF Lens – Essentially the same lens as the 50mm f/1.8G reviewed above, this version of the lens is for those who have a camera body with an in-body focusing motor. Most entry-level cameras (Nikon D40, D60, D3000, D3100, D5000, D5100) do not have in camera focusing motors, so they will have to purchase the more expensive “G” version. Semi-pro and pro level Nikons (Nikon D80, D90, D7000, D300, D300s, D700, etc.) do have the focusing motor in body, so this is the lens to purchase for those cameras. Score: 8/10

Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S Lens – Amazon presently lists this as its 2nd most popular DSLR lens. This is absolutely no shock to us, as it’s a great lens at an excellent prime focal length and it only costs $200. For general purposes, there are few faults with it. For Disney shooting, we recommend the slightly more expensive (well, double the cost, actually) Sigma 30mm, because it’s better for dark rides (the extra 5mm makes a huge difference on most rides as far as composition goes), is better-built, and has an aperture of f/1.4. However, if the Sigma 30mm isn’t in your budget, you can’t go wrong with this.  Score: 9.5/10

Nikon D90 + Sigma 30mm f/1.4

Nikon D90 + Sigma 30mm f/1.4

Sigma 30mm f/1.4 Lens – The holy grail of portrait and dark ride lenses as far as we’re considered, the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 is the perfect focal length for photographing dark rides, and it’s a more natural portrait lens for using in the parks. It produces buttery-smooth bokeh and the images really pop. Plus, with an aperture of f/1.4, it’s a bit faster than f/1.8 lenses. While Nikon offers the 35mm f/1.8 for a bit less, do not be convinced that this is a better option! Spend a little more and get the exceptional quality of the Sigma. You will not regret it. Loses a point only because of quality control issues (don’t buy this used or from a store without a good return policy). (Read Our Full Review w/ Photo SamplesScore: 9/10

Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 Lens – Essentially a replacement and upgrade for the kit lens that comes with most entry level DSLRs. It allows for more creativity, but also covers a very useful focal range, so it’s not a niche lens like an ultra-wide angle or a fisheye. It covers largely the same focal length (17-50mm v. 18-55mm) as a kit lens, but offers better image quality, better low-light performance, and allows for more shallow depth of field because of the constant f/2.8 aperture. (Read Our Full Review w/ Photo Samples) Score: 9.5/10

Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 Lens – The world’s first constant aperture f/1.8 zoom lens. The f/1.8 aperture is not just a gimmick that Sigma managed to toss into a lens. I was shocked by how sharp and nice the bokeh looked, and at the lens’ overall construction and design. About the only sacrifice that Sigma made with this lens is its focal range, but even that is pretty suitable for a lot of uses. Highly recommended as a ‘first upgrade’ from the kit lens! (Read Our Full Review w/ Photo Samples) Score: 9.5/10

DSC_0053 as Smart Object-1 copy

Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 OS Lens - Another option for a kit lens replacement, this lens rivals the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 lens in terms of quality. Here, instead of a constant f/2.8 aperture for shallow depth of field, you have a variable aperture, a bit more zoom, and optical image stabilization. The optical and build quality is a significant step up over a kit lens with both this and the Tamron, so it’s only a question of whether the fixed f/2.8 aperture of that lens matters to you. (Read Our Full Review w/ Photo Samples) Score: 9/10

Nikon 12-24mm f/4 Lens – When I first got my Nikon D90, I purchased this lens and owned it for about a month. It was a great lens, but even then, I was a wide angle freak. I found myself always using the lens at 12mm, and quickly decided I wanted the Tokina 11-16mm after reading a few reviews. This lens is definitely a better option than the Tokina if you’d rather have more range, but the Tokina bests it in about every other regard. It’s also quite pricey. Score: 7/10

Nikon 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G Lens – I have only had a couple chances to play with this lens, but it seems like a great successor to the earlier Nikon 12-24. It’s not quite as sharp as the 12-24, but it’s cheaper and has a wider range, which more than makes up for that, in my book. Definitely a great option for those wanting more range than the Sigma 8-16 or Tokina 11-16 offer. Score: 8/10

Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 Lens – Some might call me an ultra-wide angle “fiend.” Well, this is the lens that started it all! The Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 is another gem. With an aperture of f/2.8, it’s fast enough to use hand-held at night (or on some dark rides!) and its image quality is stunningly sharp. The only slight qualm is that it’s only 11mm at its widest. For most people this won’t be an issue, though. I just like really wide shots. If you do get this lens, make sure you use it to its full potential by leveraging the distortion it produces. Don’t just use it to “zoom backwards” or cram more things into the frame. (Read Our Full Review w/ Photo Samples) Score: 9.5/10

Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 Lens – At 8mm, this lens is incredibly wide. Amazingly wide. Thanks to that, it can produce some really interesting shots that exaggerate distances and lines. Great for architectural shots. The only faults with the lens are that it’s slower (f/4.5-5.6) than most ultra-wides, it doesn’t accept filters, and its focus is a little slow. The fact that it’s 8mm on the wide end makes up for those faults, though. Score: 8/10

Nikon D7000 + Rokinon 8mm Fisheye

Nikon D7000 + Rokinon 8mm Fisheye

Rokinon 8mm f/3.5 Manual Focus, Fisheye Lens – This lens goes by many different names (Rokinon, Bower, Pro-Optic, Samyang, etc.), but if you find a lens that is an 8mm f/3.5 fisheye, it’s this one. This is really an amazing lens for it’s target audience. It’s really wide, reasonably fast, and incredibly cheap. It is manual focus, but manual focus is no problem at all on a fisheye lens. I sets mine to 3′ and typically never adjust it during the trip since at 3′, everything in the shot is in focus (there is some scientific explanation to this, but I don’t know what that is!). (Read Our Full Review w/ Photo Samples) Score: 10/10

Tokina 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 Fisheye Lens – Fisheye lenses are a lot of fun, and this was my first. If you don’t want to buy a separate ultra-wide angle lens, this is a great option, as the closer you get to 17mm on the zoom, the more it’s like a regular ultra-wide. Reviewed solely as a fisheye, it’s not quite as appealing it’s not as wide as other fisheye lenses. It really only loses points because of its price, which is higher than the superior Rokinon 8mm. It’s a great lens if you really need zoom or autofocus. Score: 7.5/10

Full Frame Lens Reviews

Nikon D600 + Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8

Full frame lenses are designed for full frame DSLRs (the top of the line, most expensive cameras) and standard film cameras. While crop sensor lenses do not properly work on full frame cameras, full frame lenses DO work on crop sensor cameras. Here are our full frame sensor capsule lens reviews. We have full reviews for some of these lenses, so refer to the links in some capsule reviews to read more about a particular lens or see sample photos from it.

Sigma 50-500mm OS LensOn full frame with this lens, you do have a zoom range that goes from normal field of view to extreme zoom (roughly 10x of zoom) with optical stabilization, but its bulky size makes it really difficult to use. Consider how much you’ll actually use 300-500mm before buying this over a more “normal” all-in-one zoom lens. (Read Our Full Review w/ Photo Samples) Score 7/10

Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II Lens – Before you read any further, this lens is around $2,500. Now that I’ve lost 99% of you, it’s worth $2,500. That said, I don’t have that kind of money to spend on photography equipment (this is a hobby for me, after all), so the only time I use this lens is when I borrow it from a relative. When I have it with me, it’s rarely in my bag. One of the few times I use a telephoto lens more than a wide angle. It’s such an awesome lens. While it’s a 10/10 in terms of quality, it loses a point due to cost. Score: 9/10

Nikon D600 + Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VR @ ISO 6400

Nikon D600 + Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VR @ ISO 6400

Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM macro lens – Sigma’s newest macro lens is compatible with full frame and crop sensor DSLRs and presents a great alternative to first party Canon and Nikon macro options. Macro lenses are very niche so it’s certainly not for everyone, but I think this focal length is perfect for macro work, and this lens is incredibly sharp and performs really well. Plus, that bokeh is just something else. I wouldn’t own this lens because it’s not for me, but for what it is, it’s nice. (Read Our Full Review w/ Photo Samples) Score: 8/10

Nikon 50mm f/1.8G AF-S Lens – The nifty fifty as it’s known among its fans, this lens is highly overrated for crop sensor photographers, but a great option for full frame shooters. While you can produce some great images with it, for Disney trips, it’s not that great of a lens on a crop sensor (DX) camera (if you don’t know what a crop sensor camera is–it’s most sub-$2,500 camera bodies). If you’re trying to take photos of dark rides or portraits, most of the time you’ll find that it’s simply too much “zoom.” For full frame shooters, it’s a great walk-around lens and the perfect focal length for dark rides. Plus, it’s a great value.  Score: 9/10

Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 VC Lens – This is the only 24-70mm f/2.8 lens to have image stabilization, which makes this lens is a pretty big deal. It’s also significantly cheaper than its Canon and Nikon OEM counterparts, thus almost begging the question: “is this lens too good to be true?” No, no it’s not too good to be true. The lens flat-out performs, going toe to toe with its counterparts and besting them overall. (Read Our Full Review w/ Photo Samples) Score 9.5/10

Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Lens - The first lens in Sigma’s reinvented “Art” line, this lens surpasses the first party 35mm lenses at about half the cost. This lens can do it all–from beautiful bokeh at f/1.4 plus a tack sharp in focus area, to great streetscapes and landscapes with front to back sharpness at higher apertures. This is the perfect walk-around prime lens for someone really wanting to let go with their creativity. By far the prime lens that I use the most. (Read Our Full Review w/ Photo Samples) Score 10/10

DSC_8913 as Smart Object-1 copy

Sigma 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye Lens - For full frame Nikon shooters, this is the best quality fisheye option available. The Nikon counterpart is old and outdated, and while the Zenitar is a great budget lens, it’s not quite at the same level as the Sigma in terms of quality. The trade-off is that this lens is significantly more expensive. It’s a great lens, but most photographers looking to dabble in fisheye would be better served by the cheap Zenitar. (Read Our Full Review w/ Photo Samples) Score 9/10

Zenitar 16mm f/2.8 Fisheye Lens – This inexpensive fisheye lens is incredibly sharp and fun to use, and at less than $250, it’s significantly cheaper than other fisheye lenses. The only downside is that it’s not sharp wide open, but its image quality and sunburst quality when stopped down–plus that price–make it very appealing to full frame photographers who want a fisheye lens, but don’t want to spend $800. (Read Our Full Review w/ Photo Samples) Score 9/10

Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8 Lens - This lens is the reason I made the jump to full frame photography. It’s truly the holy grail for anyone who loves wide angle photography, but, unfortunately, it isn’t all that wide on a crop sensor body. There aren’t enough superlatives in the world for this lens. It’s tack sharp, fast, and is very versatile for a wide angle lens. Read our full review for all the juicy details!   (Read Our Full Review w/ Photo Samples) Score: 10/10

We hope this lens guide helps you select your next lens! 

If you are considering a purchase of any photography equipment, lenses, or anything else for that matter we would greatly appreciate it if you use the Amazon links in this post to make your purchase. It benefits the site, doesn’t cost you a dime, and helps us to keep providing you with useful content! Every penny helps!

Your Thoughts…

Do you have a favorite lens that isn’t listed here? Have thoughts on one that is listed here? Have any questions or need clarification? Hearing from you is half the fun, so please share your thoughts in the comments below!

23 Responses to “DSLR Lens Reviews”

  1. Joe says:

    Hi Tom,
    I was wondering what you thought of the Nikon 24-120 f/4, specifically on a DX (crop sensor) camera like the d90 or d7000 series. How does it compare to the nikon 18-70, 18-105 or the 16-85VR? I assume that it’s better than all 3 of them.
    Thoughts?

    • Tom Bricker says:

      The Nikon 24-120 f/4 is an FX lens, and it’s sort of an odd focal range for DX. Personally, I’d go with the 18-105 instead if you’re debating between the two. The 24-120 will has better IQ, but it’s also much, much more expensive.

  2. George Tabler says:

    I am getting ready to upgrade from D5100 to D600. I shoot Disneyland/DCA mostly and I am wondering what lenses you would recommend on the slightly more budget side. I love the Fish-eye so that will be one and I probably a fast enough lens for the dark rides. Is there an equivalent to the Sigma 30 for FX (50mm I presume?) Maybe a longer zoom, also?

  3. Bob W says:

    Tom,

    I was thinking about bringing my Canon 100-400L with me specifically for the Animal Kingdom safari ride. This is much to the dismay of my wife. Are there any other places that I may find myself wanting the “big lens” while in Disney?

    • Tom Bricker says:

      I am a firm believer that any lens can work in any situation if you’re looking for creative results. You could do some awesome things with that lens and compression in many of the parks. However, I’m with your wife–I wouldn’t bring it. It’s simply too much lens and it will draw attention on you that you probably don’t want in a theme park.

      • Tony D says:

        I’m traveling to Disney in two weeks for a family vacation and I am torn between the Nikon 24-120 f/4 and the Nikon 17-55 7/2.8. I’m shooting on a DX format camera and originally was going to go with the 17-55 but I am afraid I will not have enough reach with it. How much will shooting with a FX lens on a DX body affect the picture?

      • Tom Bricker says:

        In this case, it won’t negatively affect it. So long as 24mm is wide enough for you, the 24-120mm f/4 is a good option, even on DX.

  4. Lee says:

    Tom, thanks for the great info!! I am renting an all purpose lens for our next visit. I took your advice and bought the Tokina 11-16 over a year ago for a trip with intent to buy, use, sell on return as it was cheaper than renting. Well I bought, used, used, used …. and still use it!!

    Is that Rokinon 8mm (under its various names) quite difficult to find? I’ve intermittently done searches for it over the past few years and not come up with anything except the odd one from Hong Kong and not sure about ordering from there.

  5. hale-bopp says:

    I love my Tokina 11-16mm lens (I have version II). I have used it for some night photography at Disney, but my main thing is landscape astrophotography. Being fast is king in that game and it does well there.

    I would also put the Sigma 10mm fisheye lens in the running as well. It is more expensive but it has autofocus and (more importantly) goes to f/2.8. I have gotten great Milky Way shots with it (as well as some Disney shots).

    My next trip to Disney will feature a nice opportunity to combine astro photos with Disney photos. I already have my places and times picked out for what I want to try!

    • Tom Bricker says:

      I can definitely see the f/2.8 being useful for Milky Way shots. Although I said the Zenitar fisheye is pretty soft wide open, I think it might work fairly well for that, too.

      I’d be interest to see your Disney astro shots. I’ve tried it a couple of times there, but light pollution is always way too bad.

  6. Holly says:

    I am just now looking into getting my first DSLR camera. I found a deal on a Canon Rebel T3. It comes with the 18-55mm lens but also a 75-300mm lens. As I don’t know much about photography yet, (planning on taking a class and reading Understanding Exposure once I have the camera in hand) I’m not sure about this second lens. Is this a lens I would use or is it something they just throw in to make it seem as if you are getting a good deal? Any and all feedback would be greatly appreciated!

  7. Chip Workman says:

    I don`t suppose you have tried the Sigma 18-35mm 1.8 have you?

  8. I always was concerned in this subject and stock
    still am, appreciate it for posting .

  9. r2x2 says:

    Going to Disneyland next week and your website is awesome! Glad I did a google search and found your website! Anyway, would bringing my 70-200 VR2 an overkill? I’m thinking bringing 16-35 f/4, 24-70 and 70-200 to go with my D600. I’ll be using my 3n1 Kata 33 bag to carry them and the side quick access allows me to access them and change-out lens fast if i need to without taking off my bag.

    My other option is travel lighter and bring, 28 1.4D, 50 1.4G and 85 1.4G.

  10. Kevin Clark says:

    I am looking at upgrading from my Nikon D40 to a D5300. I am trying to find Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 Lens – that you mention above that would be compatible with the 5300. I will most likely rent it for or Disney trip as I won’t have the cash to buy it.

  11. Ben says:

    I just really getting started with using prime lenses and went with recommendation of the Sigma 30mm. It worked great when I remembered how to use a non-zoom prime lens. I am thinking about another wide angle and I see you recommend Tamron and Tolkin, what about Sigma 10-20mm 4.5-5.6. I know it is not as fast as the Tamron 10-24mm but I am wondering if you have had a chance to use it and what your thoughts are.

  12. Curt says:

    Good Morning

    Thank you for all the great advice here but I have a one or the other type question. Ive in the market for a new canon lens for an up coming Disney trip. With each thip I try to rent a new and or different lens to learn and play with. Im going back and forth between a 24mm 1.4 or a 35mm 1.4 know your more of a Nikon guy then a canon shooter but any thoughts you have would be greatly appreciated

    • Tom Bricker says:

      Well, the 24mm would be a wide angle lens, whereas the 35mm is more of a walk-around focal length. Really depends upon what other lenses you own, and what you plan to shoot. Personally, I’d go with the 24mm if you don’t already own a wide angle.

      • Curt says:

        I have a wide range of focal lengths and with in the range i have both 24mm and 35mm. At some point i will probably try both but was looking to get into primes as well as increase the amount i light i can capture before maxing out my ISO. We usually go to disney every spring and fall and i typically only take 2-3 lens and see what different things the can do and see what might translate best into a work lens. my (for some unknown reason) peter pan is my favorite ride and I’ve yet to be able to get a good shot while on it. knowing this 24 or 35?

      • Tom Bricker says:

        24 if Peter Pan’s Flight is the priority. Lots of wide scenes in that. You really can’t go wrong with either lens, though.

  13. Patrick says:

    Hi Tom,

    I was wondering if you had any experience with the AF-S Micro Nikkor 85mm 1:3.5g ED? I’ve got an upcoming trip to Disney and was trying to decide whether or not it would be worth it to bring it with me in my bag. Not really sure whether Magic Kingdom would present any great opportunities to use it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>