Using Telephoto Lenses at Disney


Telephoto lenses are usually treated as options for sports, wildlife, or other distant action. Many professional photographers even recommend doing without telephoto lenses, because you should instead “zoom with your feet.” With regard to photography in the Disney theme parks, I can’t even count the number of times I’ve heard people advise others to only take their telephoto lenses to Animal Kingdom, as that’s the only park where they’ll “need the zoom.” This advice concerning telephoto lenses and the limited idea of what they can do is flat out wrong.

Certainly, telephoto lenses are great options for sports and wildlife photography, but they have far more uses beyond situations where you need more reach. In fact, it’s downright puzzling that serious photographers (especially professionals) wouldn’t understand this. Every lens has separate practical and creative applications. Wide angle lenses give a wider field of view, but they also allow for introducing intentional distortion into scenes, suggesting expanses of space, and clever interplay with lines. 35mm or 50mm prime lenses fairly replicate the human eyes’ field of view, but they also allow for isolating elements of a frame with shallow depth of field. There are examples for every lens, and while the practical uses often define the lens, it’s the ability to harness the creative uses that define the photographer. If every lens has both practical and creative uses, why would a telephoto lens be any different?

It’s not. The difference with a telephoto lens, I think, is that it is much more difficult to use in creative ways, and the practical uses are so apparent that it’s very easy to just be content with using a telephoto lens for ‘zoom.’ I’m not chastising anyone for doing this, as I have done it myself. Telephoto lenses are a challenge to use creatively, and their size often makes it easier to just leave them back in the hotel when you know you won’t need them for their practical purpose. The purpose of this article is to take a look at some of the creative uses, and try to stimulate creativity so you use them for more than just sports, wildlife, and other action. While the examples here will be pulled from the Disney theme parks, the ideas are universally applicable.

Most of these photos are shot with a Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VR lens (and in some cases, the Nikon 1.7 II Teleconverter). However, the great thing about the types of shots discussed here is that you don’t need a fancy f/2.8 telephoto lens to achieve these results. This is not to say f/2.8 telephoto lenses aren’t great (they are), but for the shots here, a significantly cheaper Sigma 70-300mmTamron 70-300mm VC, or Nikon 55-300mm VR lenses will do the trick, and only cost around $150-400 each. Of course, image and build quality won’t be the same, but they will get the job done.

Let’s take a look at what–besides zoom–telephoto lenses can do!

Compression

This is by far my favorite use of telephoto lenses, and the one on which we’ll spend the most time. Unlike zoom, which is used to bring the subject closer to the photographer, compression is used to decrease the apparent distance between objects in the frame. While it’s a myth that lenses affect perspective (only where the photographer stands relative to the scene does that), focal lengths often do affect where photographers stand, so for practical purposes, there is a relationship between focal length and perspective. There’s a natural inclination to stand a distance from your scene that is the ‘ideal’ spot for viewing with your eyes. A telephoto lens allows you to purposely move farther back and zoom to effectively change the perspective you’re seeing. If that doesn’t make any sense, don’t feel bad. It’s a concept that is much easier to understand with photos.

First is a wide angle photo from Tokyo Disneyland. In the distance, you can see Cinderella Castle, but it appears fairly far away (it is–their hub is huge) and the length of World Bazaar is exaggerated. For this photo, I was standing near the front of the park.

Here, we have Cinderella Castle shot with a telephoto lens at 70mm from the same spot. The same support beams are pictured in the foreground that were in the background of the photo above, but World Bazaar appears condensed rather than exaggerated. The scene is compressed, so that it looks like Cinderella Castle is right behind the end of World Bazaar.

The reality is somewhere between the two photos, the first of which exaggerates the distance, and the second of which that compresses the scene. When looking at either of these photos by themselves, you wouldn’t think that focal length was an especially creative decision, but when comparing them, the creative difference should be clear.

Let’s do the same thing with Partners at Disneyland:

Want to plan the perfect Disneyland visit? Here are 101 of our BEST tips! http://www.disneytouristblog.com/101-best-disneyland-tips/

In this first photo, I’m right at the edge of the flower bed, shooting with a fisheye. Sleeping Beauty Castle is clearly visible, but it’s small. (I have shots with a wide angle lens from the end of Main Street with Sleeping Beauty Castle basically as a speck!)

Partners is actually a tad smaller in this shot, but Sleeping Beauty Castle is much larger. The difference is that it’s at 75mm versus 12mm for the previous shot.

Finally, Partners is slightly larger than it was in the first frame, but the Castle is so big only a portion of it fits in the frame. The difference is that this was shot at 340mm, and I was halfway down Main Street instead of at the edge of the flower bed.

Again, looking at each photo individually, it may not seem like focal length was all that creative of a decision. When viewed together, the role of focal length and positioning in the creative result of the photo is more obvious. “Little” things like this have a big impact on the end result, even if they aren’t immediately apparent as “creative.”

Now that we’ve covered how this works, here are some examples demonstrating how to leverage it with a telephoto lens for more creative photos:

Using a 300mm focal length on these ‘Mine’ seagulls, I was able to compress the distant, colorful attraction marquee to give the shot more visual interest.



This cannon by itself would have been a fairly mundane subject. Moving back and zooming in to compress the Pirates of the Caribbean marquee behind it gives it needed context that could not have been accomplished without a telephoto lens.

At 300mm, Big Thunder Mountain sure looks a lot closer to Cinderella Castle than it actually does from inside the Magic Kingdom!

The twin peaks of Sleeping Beauty Castle and the Matterhorn. Use a wide angle lens from the side of Sleeping Beauty Castle and you’ll end up with a cool photo of the two, but it won’t even begin to draw any parallels between the two, as the Matterhorn will be very small and the Castle will fill the frame.

Layering the Frame

This may seem somewhat similar to compression (there’s overlap between all three of these types of shots), but the idea here is to give more dimensionality to the photo by creating a distinction between foreground and background. One of the main pitfalls of using telephoto lenses is that they can make a scene seem flat. This is a way to combat that problem. Adding foreground bokeh is a good method, but there are other ways to do this, too.

The Disneyland Christmas tree is in the foreground here to give an added layer to the scene. This also utilizes compression (and features custom Mickey Mouse bokeh).

Using a 210mm focal length and positioning myself under a tree allowed me to frame this compressed shot with some leaves in the foreground, the whale and Mickey in the mid-ground, and the Hong Kong Disneyland Train Station (and mountains!) in the background.

Here, I used a 130mm focal length and aperture of f/4 while getting low to put bokeh flowers both in front of and behind my subject, to give the scene a sense of depth (and added color).

This is a more subtle example. I started by using my Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 lens for this scene, but with that lens, only the helmsman Mickey and some poles in the frame. By switching to my telephoto lens, I was able to layer Mickey with the sun and the lighthouse, giving depth to the shot and context to the boat masts.

Placing the Flo’s sign in front of the Cadillac Mountain Range gives depth to what would otherwise just be a textured shot of the mountains.

I could have captured this shot of Nemo’s dad with a mid-range lens, but I wouldn’t have been able to stack the frame with Nemo and Dory that way.

Shallow Depth of Field

Telephoto lenses with an f/2.8 aperture are a double threat here. They have f/2.8 aperture, which allows for shallow depth of field at even shorter focal lengths, and they have longer focal lengths that are naturally conducive to shallow depth of field. Because of the latter, even telephoto lenses with apertures of f/5.6 or so can be used to produce shots with shallow depth of field. This can be great for creative purposes.

This shot combines two principles here: compression and shallow depth of field. My intent here was to make it look like the rabbit was ‘sniffing’ these Christmas lights at Disneyland. Unfortunately, they were over 100 feet behind him, so I needed a telephoto lens with a focal length of 270mm to bring them closer to him. This focal length coupled with an f/4.8 aperture (I was using a teleconverter, so that was my minimum possible aperture) gave me nice bokeh balls for him to sniff.

Using a 105mm focal length at f/2.8 turned a really distracting background into a (still sorta distracting and) vibrant backdrop with greater emphasis on Mickey.

Shallow depth of field isolates the beautiful Adventureland light fixture at Disneyland Paris. By using a longer focal length, I was able to draw in a better background than I could have with a shorter lens. Telephoto lenses are fantastic lenses for photographing details.

These flowers at the edge of the World Showcase in Epcot would look beautiful with any background, but I used a 500mm lens to place some Spaceship Earth bokeh in the background, giving the otherwise generic shot a hint of Disney.

Much like the earlier ‘Mine’ seagulls photo, the combination of focal length and aperture here (plus compression) make the yellow submarine in the background a smooth, interesting backdrop.

Hope this post gives you ideas for new ways to use your telephoto lens! I have three categories listed here, but the possibilities aren’t just confined to these categories–I have plenty of creative telephoto shots that don’t really fit any of them. (Some photographers even advocate using it instead of a wide angle lens for landscapes–and I sort of agree with them.) If you want other photography advice and equipment recommendations, I suggest checking out my Photography Guide. Here are a few of my other top photography blog posts:

What’s In My Camera Bag
Best Books for Improving Your Photography
5 Indispensable Tips for Better Vacation Photos
Choosing the Best Travel Tripod
Choosing the Best Camera Bag for Travel

For trip planning tips and comprehensive advice, make sure to read our Walt Disney World Trip Planning Guide and Disneyland Trip Planning Guide.

For updates on Walt Disney World, the latest news, discount information, and tips, sign up for our free monthly newsletter!

Your Thoughts…

Does this post help give you ideas to add to a telephoto lens’ versatility? Any additional ideas? Questions about telephoto lenses? Share any thoughts or questions you have in the comments!

468 ad

31 Responses to “Using Telephoto Lenses at Disney”

  1. Laura B. says:

    Absolutely loved this post! Until several months ago, I’d been struggling to truly grasp lens compression, and took a workshop with a well-known wedding photographer who also used images to help with the explanation. Add what I learned there to your explanations, with use of Disney, and I feel like my trip to WDW next week is going to net me some good shots (good for me, that is). But now I have to make room for one of my telephoto lenses.

  2. Kayla says:

    This article just blew my mind. Some of these shots I’ve seen before, but never realized what equipment choices helped produce them. I’m one of the guilty parties that packs a zoom and leaves it in the room. I’m not a lens changer to begin with, but maybe I should try it more. I’ve been to the parks enough that I could spend part of a day committed to a zoom and see what happens.

    • Tom Bricker says:

      I change lenses a ton. When I see a scene, I can typically tell right away which lens I want for it. I know some people love the idea of just using a 50mm lens and “forcing” themselves to find composition with that as it “encourages creativity” but I find that counterproductive, as creatively, I normally have my mind made up before putting the camera to my eye.

      I think that kind of thing comes with time and practice.

  3. Kevin says:

    Thanks for the post. I understand the concepts, but it’s really nice to see it explained with photos. (And unlike the photos in books, these are of places I am at least somewhat familiar with, which helps.)

    How useful do you find a teleconverter? I’ve debated whether it’s worth it be able to turn my 70-200mm into a 98-280mm (in addition to the 1.6 crop factor).

    • Tom Bricker says:

      The teleconverter is useful speficically for reach. I bought it specifically for Tokyo, because I had issues shooting Legend of Mythica and Fantasmic there with the 70-200. It would be similarly useful for WDW’s Fantasmic, other DHS shows, and photographing animals at DAK.

      Basically, if you ever find yourself needing more reach, it’s useful. I’d go for the 1.7 over the 1.4 or 2.0. I did a lot of reading and that’s where I ultimately settled even though I really wanted even more reach.

      • Kevin says:

        Thanks. I’m on Canon, and I don’t think there’s even a 3rd party 1.7 teleconverter for whatever reason. I’m also shooting on f/4 (love the lens and gave up a stop of light for half the price and 21 ounces of weight savings), so the 2x would probably be too much.

  4. Michael Burk says:

    Nice! My Tamron VC 70-200, literally came in the mail today!

  5. Tommy says:

    Awesome! This post came at the perfect time. During the past week I have been Googling info about using telephotos, compression, and looking up Disney park photos taken at over 70mm.

    Great info as always. I think I’ll try spending a couple days with my Tamron 70-300 when I hit the parks for Dapper Day. Not to highjack the current discussion but what kind of lenses (for APS-C) would you recommend for Dapper Day? I was thinking of the Sigma 30mm for fully body portraits. But I’ve also heard 30mm focal length causes unpleasant facial distortion. Any thoughts? Thanks Tom.

    • Tom Bricker says:

      Some people say that 85mm is the perfect focal length for portraits, but I have never noticed ‘unpleasant’ facial distortion with a 30mm. You’re probably better off using the Tamron, but I think either option is fine.

      • Tommy says:

        Coolio. Thanks for the reply. I’ll take the Tamron and Sigma. I better bring my Rokinon 85mm f/1.4 just to cover all my bases. Better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it.

  6. Hope says:

    I love my Sigma 70-300mm which I usually use for Sport. Would love to take it to Disney World when I go in the Summer but I think my camera will be too heavy to carry around and travel with from the UK!

    • Tom Bricker says:

      I think it’s all a matter of priorities. I’ve carried my (larger) Nikon 70-200 on every international trip we taken. Of course, I am REALLY crazy about photography, so making sure I have that is a priority for me. Best of luck either way! :)

  7. Jamie says:

    Love this post. It was very informative. The photos are wonderful. I hope to get a camera other than a point and shoot one day.

  8. Lee Mac says:

    Thanks for the great post, Tom. Definitely taking my 70-300 VRII to all parks. I actually used my telephoto at all the parks last year, but you’ve given me some new ideas for some interesting and different shots.

  9. KCmike says:

    Great entry again Tom. I am debating whether or not to step up to the 24-105L Canon lens. I want to upgrade my kit lens and can see myself venturing into a full frame body somewhere down the road. Bravo on on these shots as they are so inspiring.

    • Tom Bricker says:

      I had the Nikon equivalent of that lens, and while it was fine, it just didn’t wow me (given the cost). I’ve heard great things about that Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 II, but it’s more expensive. I’d probably save for that and/or the 70-200.

  10. Chris M. says:

    Great post! And the timing is funny, in a good way. My family and I are currently at Disneyland Resort and I recently spent a day in both parks with the 70-200 2.8 while walking around with my family. And I gotta say… I loved it! Surprisingly, the size and weight wasn’t a problem for me. I actually liked it better than using my uwa and 35mm lenses as it allowed me to get certain shots. In fact, I plan to use it again today for most of the day. We fly back tomorrow so it’ll be my last chance to use it in the parks.

    Also, thank you for including samples with the 1.7 TC. I’ve been thinking about picking one up.

  11. Brittany says:

    I was wondering if you’d offer a suggestion for a lens for me. We’re going on our 1st family trip to Disney World. I’ll be taking my Canon 60D camera. I have a 35mm, 50mm and 70-200mm lens but I am thinking of renting a lens (or two) instead of relying on these. I was wondering if you’d recommend any specific lenses for me. I have seen you suggest telephoto lenses, fish eye lenses, etc but I’m not sure which way to go on my crop sensor that I could leave on the camera throughout the trip and get great shots of the family AND the park. Thanks!!

  12. Hey I am so happy I found your site, I really found
    you by accident, while I was browsing on Bing for something else, Nonetheless I am here now and
    would just like to say cheers for a marvelous post and
    a all round interesting blog (I also love the theme/design),
    I don’t have time to go through it all at the moment but I have book-marked it and also included
    your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a lot
    more, Please do keep up the awesome job.

    Feel free to visit my blog charity car donations

  13. WOW just what I was searching for. Came here by
    searching for start own home

    Feel free to surf to my webpage … making money home

  14. It’s perfect time to make some plans for the long run and
    it’s time to be happy. I’ve learn this put up and if I may just I want to
    counsel you few fascinating issues or suggestions.
    Maybe you could write subsequent articles referring to this
    article. I wish to read even more issues about it!

    My site; donate your car

  15. I am regular reader, how are you everybody? This paragraph posted at this site is actually
    fastidious.

    Here is my website; diets quick weight loss

  16. Definitely consider that which you stated. Your favorite reason seemed to
    be at the internet the simplest thing to remember
    of. I say to you, I definitely get irked even as people consider issues that they plainly do not realize about.
    You controlled to hit the nail upon the top and defined out the
    whole thing with no need side-effects , people could take a
    signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thank you

    my page green coffee bean

  17. Hey there! Quick question that’s entirely off topic.
    Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly?
    My blog looks weird when browsing from my iphone.
    I’m trying to find a template or plugin that might be able to correct this
    issue. If you have any suggestions, please share.
    Thank you!

    Feel free to visit my homepage garcinia cambogia premium

  18. dating site says:

    Good post. I learn something totally new and challenging on blogs I
    stumbleupon everyday. It will always be useful to read through content from
    other writers and use something from other websites.

    Feel free to visit my web page; dating site

  19. Superb, what a web site it is! This blog presents useful information to us,
    keep it up.

    Feel free to visit my webpage :: business administration salarys

  20. Stanton says:

    In December 2012, she was half way through her reconstructive procedure and has since become a symbol
    of hope for women suppressed by the Taliban, urging women to “never give up and don’t lose hope,” that “what happened, it’s part of me, part of my life and its all the time in my mind and with me. I have never personally had any plastic surgery done but there are obvious downsides to plastic surgery such as downtime, pain, and possible side effects. Furthermore, you need to really feel comfortable with the plastic surgeon you decide on.

    My page: facial plastic surgeon nc; Stanton,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>