Cars Rides Replacing Rivers of America & Tom Sawyer Island at Magic Kingdom

Walt Disney World has announced that the Cars attractions coming to Magic Kingdom will replace the Rivers of America and Tom Sawyer Island, fully eliminating the waterway. This post shares details, concept art, and everything we know about the plan–plus commentary about why this is happening and the good, bad and ugly of this news.
To bring you up to speed, this past weekend at D23: The Ultimate Disney Fan Event, Disney Experiences Chairman Josh D’Amaro revealed exciting new details about what’s coming to Walt Disney World. Two of the highlights were exciting news about Monstropolis and the Monsters Inc. Doors Coaster as well as Villains Land in Magic Kingdom.
Alongside that, one of the biggest announcements involved a Cars reimagining of Frontierland. According to Walt Disney World, soon you’ll be able to explore the uncharted territory of the great outdoors with an expansion in Frontierland themed around Pixar Animation Studios’ “Cars.” It’s time to leave Radiator Springs and head west into exciting new locations.
As part of a new update, Walt Disney World has now revealed that in order to make way for this completely new frontier, the Rivers of America and Tom Sawyer Island will be transformed into vast and rugged terrains for a rally race with some of the world’s most iconic racers.
In case you didn’t quite grasp it the first time, this means that the Rivers of America and Tom Sawyer Island will close. The Cars expansion is not going Beyond Big Thunder–at least, not in a material way–it’s filling in the Rivers of America and replacing the land that’s currently Tom Sawyer Island.
Here’s new concept art showing the new Cars section of Frontierland:

“We are thrilled to create this original Cars adventure and put our guests in the driver’s seat as we—quite literally—explore a new frontier in Frontierland,” shared Michael Hundgen, Walt Disney World Portfolio Executive Producer at Walt Disney Imagineering.
“Part of pioneering this new story includes tapping into the themes of exploration and adventure that inspire so many of us to keep propelling forward. Anytime we touch Magic Kingdom, we recognize the massive responsibility that exists to get it right and tell stories that connect with our guests.”
The new area will bring you along for the ride (pun intended) with a brand-new thrilling rally race through the mountains, climbing trails, and dodging geysers, in addition to a second attraction geared towards fun for the whole family.

Ahead of work revving into high gear next year, guests will have plenty of time to experience the charm and nostalgia of Frontierland as it is today.
And cruising just around the bend, guests will be able to venture Beyond Big Thunder Mountain into an all-new land dedicated to Disney Villains. Inspired by the wicked characters fans know and loathe, the multi-acre expansion will include two major attractions, plus dining and shopping. Walt Disney Imagineering is pushing creative boundaries to dark and mysterious levels to bring this new, first-of-its-kind land to life.
Together, these new additions to Magic Kingdom will represent the largest expansion in park history.

Turning to commentary, the Parks Panel at D23 felt a little too good to be true. That there were a few important details purposefully withheld, like the location of Monstropolis at Disney’s Hollywood Studios or how Cars and Villains would fit into Magic Kingdom, that would’ve sapped some of the energy from the room.
When it came to the Cars and Villains Land announcements, I had already assumed that, in order to accommodate both expansions, some of the Rivers of America will be lost in the process. That was also true with prior concepts that had been floated for Beyond Big Thunder. It was never entirely a beyond the berm expansion.
As I wrote in the Cars commentary, my guess was that a lot of the Rivers of America would be consumed by the expansion based on the potential size and scale of these two areas, along with Josh D’Amaro and Imagineers using the word “reimagining” in addition to “expansion” to describe the project. That also explains why Imagineering has yet to file the permit, despite indicating it would happen soon back in April. Because once the cat is out of the bag, as it is now, sentiment is going to sour on this project to at least some degree.
It wouldn’t have bothered me at all if Tom Sawyer Island is becoming Tom Sawyer Peninsula and the Rivers of America is shortened. Eliminating the dead ends at Haunted Mansion and Big Thunder Mountain Railroad would be hugely beneficial from a crowd flow perspective, especially with all the people these two new lands are going to draw.

However, that’s not what this is. There will be no more Rivers of America or Tom Sawyer Island. They’re goners.
It’s not exactly paving over paradise to put up a parking lot, but it’s kinda close. This will replace tranquil waters and a lush area that offered a lovely escape from the crowds and chaos of Magic Kingdom for almost the exact opposite of that. Loud cars racing around and attractions that will undoubtedly draw those huge crowds.
Disney is undoubtedly making this decision from a guest utilization perspective. These two Cars rides will be hugely popular, and effectively expand the capacity of Magic Kingdom in the same amount of space.

It’s no secret that the Liberty Square Riverboat and Tom Sawyer Island don’t have the hourly throughput numbers as most attractions in Magic Kingdom. Eliminating them reduces operational and maintenance expenses on attractions and areas that are underutilized and don’t offer as much operational ‘bang for buck’ to the company, so to speak.
Because of this, some fans will likely be entirely okay with this decision to eliminate the Rivers of America–as is their right. Even many longtime guests have probably never even been over to Tom Sawyer Island or done a lap on the Liberty Square Riverboat. Others probably have done so infrequently over the years, and will do these new Cars attractions more. This is necessarily true–hence the ‘underutilized capacity’ term.
From my perspective, this also at least partially misses the point. Theme parks are not just the sum of their ride rosters, to be raced around and checked off one by one. They are as much defined by the spaces in between; by the absence of attractions, too.

The Rivers of America, Liberty Square Riverboat, and Tom Sawyer Island are incredible assets to Magic Kingdom not just for the guests who actively utilize these attractions. They offer serenity and delightful atmosphere even to guests who simply walk along the waterfront promenade, stopping for a moment to catch their breath and take in the view.
It’s impossible to quantify this. That’s precisely what worries me. Sometimes Disney’s decision-makers view the parks as figures on a spreadsheet, and from that perspective, it’s easy to overlook “underutilized” things that are incredibly important to the Disney theme park experience from a holistic perspective.
It’s the little moments we treasure just as much as a ride on Big Thunder, and it’s the little details or quiet moments that become indelible parts of our memories from visits to the parks over the years. These little things might seem superfluous on paper, especially when the alternative is expanding the park and growing capacity by thousands guests.
By viewing the Rivers of America and Tom Sawyer Island as underutilized real estate that’s expendable, Disney is missing the forest for the trees. Spaces like these are what help define our days in the parks, giving us little moments to pause and absorb the big attractions and experiences we’ve enjoyed. These things and places are what keep us coming back.

There’s a long term price to be paid for viewing the parks from the perspective that every square foot must be put to its most efficient use and have its capacity maximized. That’s too myopic of a view, and ignores the practical reality that guests form impressions based on the totality of their visit, with those little things or counterprogramming adding as much as the E-Tickets.
If everything is go-go-go, the guest experience as a whole can suffer. And that’s true even if the individual attractions replacing the Rivers of America and Tom Sawyer Island end up having higher guest satisfaction scores.
There are some things that are impossible to quantify–that guests just absorb, even without realizing it. If this sentiment sounds familiar, it’s exactly how we describe the value of atmospheric entertainment–the energy can be felt subliminally even if not consciously. It brightens the mood, even if unknowingly.

It’s the exact same idea with the Rivers of America.
There’s no guest satisfaction “metric” for how many guests per day walk along that waterfront promenade, pause for a deep breath, smile and take a photo. I mean, technically there is a metric–the ones wearing smart watches probably see their heart rate drop a little, but Disney’s survey team isn’t seeing that data. (Hopefully.)
It could be an indelible moment burned into their memory, or, more likely, a fleeting bit of happiness. But it still mattered. It was important to their day as a whole. Most critically, it was a much-needed reprieve from the often stressful nature of the world’s most popular theme park. This has long been my perspective on the Rivers of America and Tom Sawyer Island–that they are invaluable assets that serve as counterprogramming to give guests an expand from the paved pathways and hustle and bustle of Magic Kingdom.
I speak from experience. This waterfront promenade is one of my favorite places in all of Magic Kingdom, and we have so many memories of this waterfront walk late at night with a cool breeze coming off the Rivers of America, or early in the mornings as the sun flitters through the trees. It is one of those places in the park that allows us to slow down, take a deep breath, and soak up our surroundings. Maybe that makes me biased, and overly sensitive to losing the Rivers of America when the average guest reaction will be: “Who cares? Bring on Cars!”

I don’t think that will be the prevailing sentiment among Walt Disney World diehards. And I’d also like to think I’m a realist.
That’s precisely why I would’ve been okay with shortening the Rivers of America and potentially making it Tom Sawyer Peninsula, even if that meant major modifications or a permanent docking of the Liberty Belle. Because doing so also would’ve met guests where they were, removing a ‘barrier of entry’ for Tom Sawyer Island (so many guests never visit simply because the rafts over are a hassle) and allowing more kids to burn off some steam in that play area.
Meanwhile, the waterfront promenade and the ambiance it added still would’ve been there for guests to enjoy while walking past the main drag of Frontierland. It still would’ve accomplished the same goals from a guest decompression perspective. If anything, the Tom Sawyer area would’ve been appreciated by more people since it would’ve been easier to access. All while offering up space for expansion. A win-win compromise for all.

Obviously, that’s not what Walt Disney World has elected to do. So I cannot say I’m fully on board with this idea right now.
To be clear, I’m not suggesting I’ll dislike the Cars area or I’m suddenly anti-Villains Land at Magic Kingdom because of this. My feelings about the Cars attraction remain mixed (more on that in a future post since my 4:30 am commentary didn’t properly articulate it) and unequivocally positive about Villains Land in a vacuum. But I also think: not like this. They should’ve tried to thread the needle better, not sacrificing a serene section of the park that’s more of an asset than they likely realize.
I’m also not foreclosing the idea that I’ll change my mind. It’s impossible to ascertain atmosphere from concept art. Maybe the promenade that I love so much will be present in some form, or will have a spiritual successor. There do appear to be waterfalls and waterways, so perhaps those will provide a sense of serenity, natural beauty, and kinetic energy.

This Cars area all could be great in a totally different or even similar way. There are flashes of the Cars concept art that give me National Park vibes, and I like that (even if other flashes of it remind me of extreme sports). I’m willing to ‘wait and see’ and withhold full judgment. (What other option do I even have? It’s not like I can single-handedly stop this!)
For now, though, I’m a bit shell-shocked by the decision to fully eliminate the Rivers of America, and worried about how that could irreparably damage the feel of Magic Kingdom. I really hope Disney is not making this decision lightly, is focused on more than just increasing capacity, and is giving Imagineers the resources to do this right.
If we’re losing this area of the park, it had better be worth it. The marquee Cars attraction needs to be as good as Radiator Springs Racers, the themed design of the area must be superlative and in keeping of the rugged spirit of Frontierland, and the new area must have great kinetic energy and atmosphere.
They cannot deliver two overly-short attractions, a sea of concrete and some trees, along with a concept that feels at-odds with Frontierland. This has gotta be strong. They have to make the skeptics (like me) concede we were wrong about ever questioning the wisdom of replacing the Rivers of America. And I absolutely will do that if they’re able to deliver. I would love nothing more than to eat crow. I’ve gotten used to the taste over the years.

Finally, instead of being singularly fixated on increasing capacity, I wish Walt Disney World would endeavor to eliminate stress. When it comes to this, there are the usual suspects–screen time, lines, ride breakdowns, etc. But another one is offering up lovely places to decompress that bring smiles to the faces of guests.
Some of those decision-makers should go inside one of the massive Magic Kingdom quick-service restaurants during the middle of the day and count all of the people not eating anything. Just sitting there with their heads on the tables or attempting to ‘rest and recharge’ in about the most chaotic environment possible. (Nothing says ‘recharging’ quite like the midday rush at Pinocchio Village Haus!)
I’m not kidding. One important goal should be getting these people out of the loud and unpleasant restaurants and into actual serene spaces that offer nice ambiance and actually will allow them to mentally refuel for a brief bit. Walt Disney World needs to understand that Magic Kingdom is a world-class theme park, and those two words have meanings beyond just the fanciest and most modern rides. There should be a concerted effort to not just keeping it a “park” but enhancing that angle. It may not be captured on guest satisfaction surveys, but it’s as big a part of what separates Disney from an average amusement park as the envelope-pushing attractions.
Planning a Walt Disney World trip? Learn about hotels on our Walt Disney World Hotels Reviews page. For where to eat, read our Walt Disney World Restaurant Reviews. To save money on tickets or determine which type to buy, read our Tips for Saving Money on Walt Disney World Tickets post. Our What to Pack for Disney Trips post takes a unique look at clever items to take. For what to do and when to do it, our Walt Disney World Ride Guides will help. For comprehensive advice, the best place to start is our Walt Disney World Trip Planning Guide for everything you need to know!
YOUR THOUGHTS
What is your reaction to this announcement that Walt Disney World is replacing the Rivers of America and Tom Sawyer Island with Cars rides? Do you think the two all-new Cars rides coming to Magic Kingdom are “worth it”? Do you agree or disagree with our sentiment? Any questions we can help you answer? Hearing your feedback–even when you disagree with us–is both interesting to us and helpful to other readers, so please share your thoughts below in the comments!

Tom, I could not agree more with your commentary. Tom Sawyer Island is one of our favorite areas in the Magic Kingdom. We first discovered the area when our son was 2 years old and it was the perfect place to take a quiet walk away from the crowds and lines. Every year when we return to Disney, we visit Tom Sawyer’s Island for a respite and delight in watching the children play. I am saddened that Disney executives seem to miss the forest before the trees. Dare I mention our favorite treat was the Nutella and fruit waffle.
Same! The island was a desperately needed break from all the heat and stimulation on our recent trip, it was truly a highlight of that day for us. AND it’s one of the only areas of the park that kids under 5 can actually just play and use their own imaginations, most of Magic Kingdom is really not toddler-friendly. Really, really poor decision by Disney.
Mistake, Josh, Mistake! Anyone want to buy 500 DVC points cheap?
Good luck the DVC market is SUPER soft right now!!! 🙂 😉
Ugh. (Checks Tom’s preferred rating of website.) Double Ugh.
Counterproposal: Themed cabanas (shacks on the outside, comfy on the inside) on TSI to avoid summer meltdowns. Shut up and take my money, WDW.
i agree completely. The parks needs some areas for a physical as well as visual rest. I like the water, and the boat ride. its nice to have a ‘rest’ . I dont want WDW to feel like the compact, urban DL.
I will admit TS island never offered me anything personally, and i enjoyed the Riverboat only occasionally, but there is something old-timey and nostalgic. The park needs that too. Not all bright and shiny
100% on point! Just having the water walkway and seeing Tom Sawyers Island there is part of what makes magic kingdom different from most amusement parks and so quintessentially Walt Disney. When our kids were little, we’d hit the rafts and head to what my husband nicknamed “Tom Sweaty Island” but decompressing over there was a game changer!!
This area will be deeply missed by our family- miss the sounds, scenes and overall vibe that they are removing (even if we love what they added).
So count me on the team that’s surprised its taken this long to replace TSI and RoA. My guess is you’re going to see more people in the queue for an hour for those Cars rides than you’d see in the majority of the day for TSI and RoA combined (which is also a net positive – line queues are a crowd control mechanism of a sort).
That said, I think there’s an important framing here that needs to be shifted. I get it looks bad for “they’re replacing TSI and RoA with CARS??!?!” I think the better framing is that they’re trading off TSI and RoA to get the Villains land developed, and there needed to be some sizable attraction in between just to fix the sight lines and give Villains the isolated feel its going to need to be effective.
Just looking at the satellite map for anything “Beyond Big Thunder” gives and easy view of limitations there. The starting point for anything North of Big Thunder would be to draw an east/west line from the maintenance canal to the Haunted Mansion building – everything north of that is gone for a new land at a minimum. Add on to that the Railroad, which is either going to go right through the middle of Villains, or it’ll be a border. So you’ve got a somewhat constrained space that is going to need serious sight separation to maintain the environment (seriously, my biggest question is how they’re going to pull off dark and brooding open environment in beautiful weather – I’m expecting something like Pandora just way moodier), and there has to be SOMETHING to break up the visuals between the two lands. That’s a known thing that Imagineering is big on, is clean visual transitions from land to land.
So at a minimum, you’re eliminating the back half of TSI and RoA, you need to build something that breaks the sightlines for Villains, and that something has to be an IP that at least fits thematically with Frontierland. Something that starts in Radiator Springs and goes through a mountain west environment (theorizing here, but reasonable based on renderings) hits those buttons perfectly. For starters, lets not pretend that the Cars environment doesn’t fit Frontierland well – Radiator Springs matches Frontierland WAY better than, say, New Orleans. Next, you get a large-scaled (or at least large-forced-perspective) ride that not only solves the sightline/transition issue, but gives Imagineering a sizable playground for environment on the backside of it into Villains.
In the grand scheme of things, this makes total sense – the tradeoff is TSI and RoA for Villains, and Cars is just the mechanism they’re going to use to break up the various lands. That’s utilization maximization in its most brilliant form – it’s not that its two rides to better utilize an underutilized space, it’s replacing an underutilized space with a brand new land, and the two new rides are just add-on bonuses for environmental reasons.
Get real! It’s without doubt a money grab to increase guest spending at the expense of experience…nothing else.
The Orlando property is gigantic, but it feels like they treat it more like VCR tape, repeatedly erasing old material to make room for new stuff in mostly the same old spots, as if WDW was in Anaheim.
I’d be interested in a deeper discussion of why they don’t really want to build significantly “Beyond Big Thunder”. Is it the extra walking that would require? Is it the permitting process? Environment impact statements? What? The generic swamp out back by “Floridian Way” doesn’t look too special or pristine to me, when I study it on the Google Maps satellite view. It seems mostly clear and available, all the way back to “Reedy Creek Energy Services” and a boneyard for old ride parts (which could go anywhere).
Assuming this actually goes ahead I am probably a bit neurtral on this. Losing the waters would be a big loss as even Tokyo which has demolished a lot of the opening day attractions for a reason has kept the rivers in place because of it knowing about the atmosphere.
4 new E tickets including the villains land is obviously good for park capacity but I am also a bit split on this as it feels Disney is only trying to build the biggest in a park which already has issues with the numbers of people visiting it-not everything needs to be an e ticket. C and D ticket capacity monsters are fine to get crowds occupied and happy.
I am just hoping that they find a way to use the Riverboat as I know its probably for the scrapyard but moving it to say Paris given the maintainance issues the ones over there are having would be a better option. Even If I dont know how practical that is and if these craft are just built onsite.
I agree, its like all these developers that take any open, natural space in a neighborhood and have to fill it with a new 12 story apartment building or strip mall. Every single space does NOT have to be filled! Keep some areas with trees and water and quiet corners. These are the areas that make the parks great, not just more, overestimulating stuff.
I am genuinely disappointed in the decision to pave over the Rivers of America and Tom Sawyer Island. We do ride the boat when we visit, I love riding the train when we visit. Some of my best memories are taking our kids to TSI. I feel like Disney just cares about upcharging now. Constant upcharges. You think the two new Cars rides are going to be “extra” lightning lane rides? You betcha. Wonder if there will be a “buffet” at $70 a piece restaurant. Oh and you know there will a build your own car at $110 a car. Can’t make that kind of money on a serene river with some trees. I know I am old lol. I really feel like the little things that made Disney special are slipping away. But in many ways it seems like this is progress so hopefully I am wrong and it is as wonderful as the Tustin Marketplace redo of Epcot 🙂
Well put! I admit, it has been years since I visited TSI, but yes, the serenity is definitely needed. And it is an area that cannot be “physically measured”, but most definitely should be considered. My family and I are visiting this holiday season, my kids and grandkids, and my son is already stressing about the crowds, I keep telling him to focus on the ambiance and experience of the holidays at Disney :), and we will definitely take in every serene opportunity we can among the chaos of the crowds and rides! Love your posts, so much info!
Tom, excellent piece as usual. Completely agree. I’d love to see a post answering the question “Why remove ROA and TSI, rather than building the Cars attractions and Villains Land in existing space immediately north?” It seems to me that removing water and infrastructure for riverboat, rafts, etc., filling it in, stabilizing the land, etc. will be more expensive than building on existing land. WDW could take in the northern part of ROA and inaccessible portion of the island, connect ROA at the north end of the accessible portion of TSI, and leave the waterfront walkway and guest-accessible areas intact.
There has to be some reason to replace rather than expand. Any thoughts or intel?
I feel so silly, but I’m literally sitting here in tears. I know change happens a lot in the parks, but this one hurts so much.
You’re not silly at all Victoria, it makes me want to cry as well!
Same. My son (or maybe both sons) and I were already planning to figure out how to manage Dinosaur one more time. But this just hurts. They don’t get this one as much because we didn’t go there a lot, but as a kid I did. They’ve already taken so much from those of us that have been around for a while. I understand progress but much of the reason I go to WDW is nostalgia. I’ll live. Cars will be cool. But it does hurt.
I gotta say, I’m absolutely thrilled that they are removing the entire area. It’s ugly, and the water is dirty and gross. It feels old and rundown.
I’m excited for something new, and that is more fun for everyone. Not to mention the fear of alligators in the water does make me uncomfortable.
I can’t wait for this new area, and it will be a huge thrill for my grandson. Their isn’t as much fun for small boys as there is for small girls.
First of all, cars hadn’t been invented yet during the frontier days of America so this does not fit in the theme of Frontierland. My brother and I loved Tom Sawyers Island growing up, and my 2 daughters loved it too. My husband and I loved going there and sitting in the peaceful quiet to get a respite from the business of the park. We will miss it greatly.
To me this is like New York replacing Central Park with high rises. RIP TSI and ROA.
Agreed!
I agree with Tom. I have enjoyed Tom Sawyer Island over the last 50+ years with my children & now my grandchildren. The kids always enjoyed the cave and bouncing on the barrel bridge and having lunch at Aunt Polly’s. They also enjoyed the fort; I still have a picture of my 43 year old son when he was 2 years old shooting the gun at the fort. It was a place to let them run & play & be kids.
Someone already started a petition. This needs to go viral.
Stop Disney from Removing Iconic Lands from Walt Disney World
https://www.change.org/p/stop-disney-from-removing-iconic-lands-from-walt-disney-world?source_location=search
Completely agree with everything you expressed. Every year being in the parks is more stressful, it is difficult to slow down and enjoy all the things you may not notice otherwise.
It’s time for change. You can look at Bay Lake. The Cars attraction in Disneyland is AMAZING! You’re going to love it.