Port Discovery Expansion & Aquatopia Replacement Revealed for Tokyo DisneySea

Less than a year after the successful opening of Fantasy Springs, the blockbuster $2 billion Tangled, Frozen, and Peter Pan expansion that opened last summer at Tokyo DisneySea, the Oriental Land Company (OLC) has unveiled brand-new concept art for future expansions in both parks. This breaks down the replacement for Aquatopia and expansion of Port Discovery at Tokyo DisneySea.

This reveal comes via OLC’s 2035 Long-Term Management Strategy, released to investors on April 28, 2025. Along with this, OLC reported record results for the most recent fiscal year, likely fueling the desire for further expansion beyond that Wreck-It Ralph and new Space Mountain attractions currently under construction in Tomorrowland at Tokyo Disneyland.

This 10-year plan for Tokyo Disney Resort reveals that the goal is to “provide moving experiences and surprises that cannot be found anywhere else in the world through development unique to Tokyo Disney Resort.” This will be accomplished via the “dynamic restructuring of our theme park sites including possible large-scale development such as area-wide redesign.”

OLC further states that the goal is to “constantly enhance the appeal of our theme parks by redesigning attractions and entertainment programs, offering time-limited special versions, and utilizing previously unused intellectual property and new technologies.”

To accomplish this, they plan to create new facilities and experiences, while also revamping existing venues and expanding services in pursuit of comfort and convenience to respond to changes in guests’ behavior and needs within the parks.

Nothing here is stop-the-presses news. OLC began offering vague summations of its medium and long-term plans in this report from 2016 when first announcing the Fantasyland/Tomorrowland expansion (Beauty and the Beast and Baymax) for Tokyo Disneyland and Soaring: Fantastic Flight for Tokyo DisneySea. This 10-year plan is pretty close to what they presented as their long-term vision almost a decade ago.

In that 2016 document, OLC indicates that the long-term plan for Tokyo Disneyland is “area-based development for each themed land, to take place in stages, is intended to leave a lasting impact.” While I’m not going to comb through every OLC report over the last decade, the vibe we’ve gotten from all of them has been a mix of place-making and replacing/revitalizing existing attractions, not outright expansion.

Even back then, Oriental Land Company indicated that leaning more heavily on tourists is only one of its medium-term goals (as of 2017), and not the main one. Rather, the top priority is to “foster medium to long-term fans (repeat guests),” which OLC ties directly to the aging population and declining birthrate.

That was in the lead-up to the Tokyo 2020 Summer Olympics, which were to be instrumental in helping Japan achieve a new record number of inbound tourists. That did not happen in 2020 for reasons that should be obviously. That year and 2021 set record lows, with international tourism only starting to recover in late 2022.

However, Japan did set a new record for inbound visitors last year, and the data I’ve seen thus far in 2025 suggests the country will be breaking that record. Cumulative visitor numbers for 2025 reached 10.5 million in the quarter through March, up 23.1 percent, marking the fastest pace on record to surpass 10 million, according to the government-affiliated Japan National Tourism Organization (JNTO).

The JNTO has incredibly aggressive long-term goals for inbound visitors that, frankly, I’m not sure are even remotely sustainable given the current strain in some locales. But that’s a bit beyond the scope of this post. The point here is that OLC wants a bigger slice of this international tourism pie, as these guests are far and away the highest spenders.

Enter the expansion plan proposal for Port Discovery:

As part of the 10-year plan presentation, Oriental Land Company shared concept art for a possible reimagining of Port Discovery at Tokyo DisneySea. This very clear shows the removal of the opening-day attraction, Aquatopia.

There’s also a new promenade connecting to Cape Cod (don’t worry, Duffytown USA is safe–it’s too lucrative) and shops on one side and a medium-to-large sized show building on the other side in roughly the footprint of Aquatopia.

TDR diehards have already gotten to work detailing what this plan could entail, so here’s a look:

To add context, the building housing Nemo & Friends SeaRider is safe as is Horizon Bay Restaurant and the DisneySea Electric Railway. As SeaRider isn’t particularly popular and was a stop-gap solution even when the reimagining (from StormRider) was done, we would expect that show to be replaced.

Interestingly, the DisneySea Electric Railway does not appear to be extended, which was part of the previous long-term plan for Tokyo DisneySea expansion that predated Fantasy Springs. This means that OLC does not intend to use the last major expansion pad by Lost River Delta between now and 2035.

Also worth noting is that there appears to be a turnaround area for the DisneySea Transit Steamer Line, which is the boat service that circles the park’s waterways. This means that the new show building could extend all the way to the monorail line. (Although the fan-made concept art allows for both possibilities, hence the larger dotted line.)

Before we get carried away, it’s important to underscore that this concept art represents an example of the possible expansions under consideration. Think of this as a blue sky daydreaming session, if you will.

At the same time, don’t be overly dismissive of it. This is not completely like the 2022 D23 Expo “plans” released by Josh D’Amaro for Beyond Big Thunder expansion at Magic Kingdom and Dinoland replacement at Animal Kingdom. This is being released by OLC to investors to illustrate their 10-year vision for the parks. It’s not being done to hype up the crowd or take fans’ temperature on certain projects.

Not only that, but both the above-mentioned proposals teased by Disney were announced within a couple of years, just not with the intellectual properties initially teased (save for Villains Land). Similarly, we’d expect that the proposals released by OLC show the areas being viewed as ripe for redevelopment. Even if the final concept art varies, redevelopment of Port Discovery is probably happening. It just makes too much sense.

For those who are unfamiliar with Port Discovery, Tokyo Disney Resort describes it as a “futuristic marina located across the horizons of time.” The port of call is a vision of a wonderful tomorrow: a time where science and nature are in balance.

If Tokyo DisneySea is Japan’s EPCOT Center (it’s an apt comparison), Port Discovery has the potential to be its forward-looking thesis. This port should be the one pushing the envelope, offering something ambitious and with a real optimism for the future.

It has always fallen flat on its face in this regard–and injecting Finding Nemo only exacerbated that (and made it feel like Epcot in another way). Port Discovery had a good idea at the conceptual level, but it feels like one of the rare areas at Tokyo DisneySea where OLC didn’t give Imagineering a blank check.

The best way to describe Port Discovery in terms of other lands in Disney theme parks is Discoveryland at Disneyland Paris meets Tomorrowland ‘98 at Disneyland, but with water. Conceptually, these two lands are similar. The only difference is that Discoveryland in Paris is brilliantly executed, and Tomorrowland ‘98 in Disneyland was horribly executed.

Port Discovery fits somewhere in between. It has a lot of whirligigs and various other ornamentation on top of a industrial base, featuring lots of bronzes, greens, and other muted colors. It’s also a rather small land, never having lived up to its potential.

In additions to those existing lands, Port Discovery feels like it drew inspiration from Tony Baxter’s design for the unbuilt Discovery Bay at Disneyland. That was to be his masterpiece, and the original plans for Discovery Bay have eventually come to fruition at other parks around the globe. If you look closely at the new facades in Port Discovery (or the existing murals within the port of call), they have that same energy. Below is concept art for Discovery Bay, for reference:

If you squint, you can kind of see how Discovery Bay could translate to Port Discovery, right down to the Electric Railway and Mount Prometheus looming on the horizon. Replace Aquatopia with what’s in the foreground, and we’re almost there. Sorta, kinda.

As for Aquatopia, it’s an interesting attraction–but one that I’d happily sacrifice for a meatier Port Discovery (Bay). It uses the trackless ride system from Pooh’s Hunny Hunt (in fact, the system was first designed for Aquatopia even though it opened later according to Imagineers working on the project) and combines that with water, which undoubtedly made for an expensive attraction with high maintenance costs, but there’s not really any substance to it.

To its credit, Aquatopia is enjoyable and pretty (especially at night). It also adds a lot of kinetic energy to the area. It’s more fun than Autopia and definitely looks cooler, but I was still left with a “that’s it?” feeling from Aquatopia. We still ride it from time to time, especially at night or during the “get wet” version in the summer, but it’s not high on my list of priorities. I won’t wait in a line longer than 10 minutes for this.

Along with Raging Spirits, Aquatopia is one of two attractions at Tokyo DisneySea that is as enjoyable to watch as it is to ride. When it comes to the “get wet” version of Aquatopia, I’d argue that it’s more fun to watch the reactions of Japanese guests.

In any case, this isn’t exactly high praise for Aquatopia. I wouldn’t go as far as saying that nothing of value is being lost here–as Aquatopia does have value and will undoubtedly be missed–but a new modern ride with a show building and Imagineering given an OLC budget will almost assuredly be better.

Equally exciting for me is that it appears the futuristic city of Port Discovery will finally be realized along the promenade lined with shops and the attraction facade. There’s concept art in the Electric Railway Station and Horizons Bay teasing what this could be…and now it might finally come to fruition?! Sign me up.

Ultimately, that’s where I stand with the Port Discovery redevelopment and expansion. This is the weakest port of call at Tokyo DisneySea, despite being the one with the most unrealized potential. It’s very shallow, lacking in depth and dimensionality in a park that’s otherwise oozing details. For all of these reasons, we’ve assumed for a while that Port Discovery was on the chopping block–potentially being replaced by a larger land and tied to the expansion pad behind it. I’m pleased that won’t happen–that Port Discovery is being given a second chance and that OLC is saving that pad for future use.

It’s not like the premise of Port Discovery is inherently limiting–this could be the original EPCOT Center of Tokyo DisneySea, so there are a ton of possibilities here. While I doubt we’ll get a modern version of Horizons as a replacement for Aquatopia (it’ll probably be an IP ride, if we’re being honest with ourselves), this is most definitely a high-floor, high-ceiling type of project. There’s about a 99.1% chance that this ends up being better than what it replaces. We cannot wait.

Planning a trip to Tokyo Disney Resort? For comprehensive advice, the best place to start is our Tokyo Disneyland & DisneySea Trip Planning Guide! For more specifics, our TDR Hotel Rankings & Reviews page covers accommodations. Our Restaurant Reviews detail where to dine & snack. To save money on tickets or determine which type to buy, read our Tips for Saving Money post. Our What to Pack for Disney post takes a unique look at clever items to take. Venturing elsewhere in Japan? Consult our Ultimate Guide to Kyoto, Japan and City Guide to Tokyo, Japan.

YOUR THOUGHTS

What do you think of the Port Discovery expansion and redevelopment proposal? Disappointed to be losing Aquatopia, or do you view this flat ride as underutilized capacity in a space-constrained park? What do you think of anything else covered here? Do you agree or disagree with our assessment? Any questions? Hearing your feedback—even when you disagree with us—is both interesting to us and helpful to other readers, so please share your thoughts below in the comments!

You might also like...

19 Comments

  1. Whilst I like Aquatopia I am more concerned about the loss of the Transit Steamer being able to circle the park. It feels like a popular and integral transportation method around the park as well as a huge driver of kinetics. I don’t think the waterways are viable for constant two way traffic so I guess the capacity would be severely decreased.

    1. Nothing named yet; all I think we have is OLC’s announcement that the next ten years of TDS investment will focus on Port Discovery, the image illustrating their proposal which clearly shows an indoor replacement for Aquatopia, and the knowledge that existing rides aren’t that popular. In addition to SeaRider just not being popular, the difference in crowds for the “get wet/soaked” version of Aquatopia has probably convinced OLC that they can do better with that location. (Since I do love the “on the move” aspects of the 1959 and 1967 Tomorrowland updates that the Aquatopia evokes whether I’m riding it or not, I’d suggest DisneySea incorporate a modern Skyway attraction with Skyliner technology at some point.)

  2. Tom I totally agree with you about Mermaid Lagoon. It was a wonderful area for my 7 year old granddaughter. We spent close to 2 hours there. It was exactly what families with small children needed and it also attracted older kids. Everyone seemed to enjoy the semi-dark tunnels and mazes. Enjoyed it so much we had the energy and interest in spending money in the gift shops!! This is a spot that adults have a chance to relax and watch their kids run around! I think Disney’s USA parks have forgotten about the importance of having a wind down area for everyone.

  3. I fell in love with the concept art for Discovery Bay years ago when I found out about the shelved project. To see those facades finally be built at a Disney park would make me SO happy.

  4. Having just returned from Tokyo Disney, I have 100% faith that the Port Expansion ends up being better than what it replaces. 3 Cheers to the Tokyo Imagineers for their fantastic, out of this world, creations. I am ashamed of the USA Imagineers and Disney Corp for what they have produced these last few years. I hope that all your readers have the opportunity to visit Tokyo Disney. Everything there far exceeds the quality and imagination of the USA. Instead of building a ride – they build a village/story surrounding the ride. You truly walk around each section of both parks realizing you have entered a magical land and the outside world doesn’t exist.

    1. “I am ashamed of the USA Imagineers…”

      Don’t blame the Imagineers. It’s very common for Imagineers to bounce around between the domestic and international portfolios, and many Imagineers who worked on Fantasy Springs are now on assignments at WDW or DLR. In fact, back when Tokyo DisneySea was being designed, there was the perception that it was being done by the “B-Team,” while the top talent focused on DCA. Obviously, we know how that turned out!

      It’s entirely a management/leadership/priorities problem. Absolutely nothing to do with WDI.

    2. It’s about money. OLC seems willing to spend to an extent Disney isn’t, for whatever financial reasons. Tokyo DisneySea is what you get when something close to the “blue sky” concept actually gets funding!

    3. Matt – I am not sure if it is about money. USA Disney Corp is spending a lot of money destroying Walt’s original ideas without adding enjoyment for the visitors. Splash Mountain? Lots of money spent there for the same thrill for the riders. And now the destruction of Tom Sawyers Island and River’s of America for a car ride. In my opinion Disney Corp wants to get rid of Walt’s dreams and turn WDW into another Universal. Tokyo enhances their parks with more of Walt’s ideas and dreams. They create an entire section based on a movie (Frozen as an example) and ultimately make a magical movie set.

  5. I won’t miss Aquatopia – my wife and I waited 30 minutes for it on our first visit to DisneySea, and it’s 30 minutes of park time I will never get back. I have faith that the area will retain plenty of kinetic energy.

    My big takeaway: that show building exterior doesn’t really look like Port Discovery at all. Cape Cod is right next door…could Duffy possibly be getting promoted to full-on attraction status? A Duffy and Friends dark ride would be a gargantuan hit with the locals and makes all the sense in the world for that location. I’m going to consider that the frontrunner for the space until an IP becomes obvious.

    1. It might be hard to believe, but Walt Disney World gets much greater investment than Tokyo Disney Resort.

      The problem isn’t necessarily funding, it’s how that money is spent. OLC spends its budgets smarter, and waste is far less common.

  6. We were really charmed by Aquatopia on our visit earlier this month. It wasn’t revolutionary, but it was fun, and more importantly it was one of the few rides in the park that didn’t have an hour-plus wait. While I’m almost certain whatever replaces it will be a more impressive attraction, I worry it will be another ride that averages triple digit wait times.

    DisneySea would benefit from a few more low time-commitment rides IMO, although I also recognize OLC can’t necessarily control that even when they purposely don’t push the envelope. (It is very clear to me that Rapunzel’s Lantern Festival was designed as supporting attraction in Fantasy Springs, but has wound up with the second highest average wait time of the new additions.)

  7. I like Aquatopia for its kinetic energy, but yeah, an indoor dark ride will probably be an improvement. Even better: by allowing the Transit Steamer to run closer to the shore of Port Discovery, you still retain some of that kineticism.
    I’m still a bit worried about what IP they’d use for the ride. Disney doesn’t have any popular IPs that fit the port’s steampunk setting (that I can think of). This is a good example of why I dislike the trend of basing all attractions on popular IPs. It’s not that original stories are INHERENTLY better than pre-exeisting ones or anything, but if you have to shoehorn in popular franchises everywhere, then you end up compromising the theme of lands for which there aren’t any good matches in Disney’s film library.

    1. Okay, so maybe it’s not a “popular” IP, but Atlantis: The Lost Empire does qualify as steampunk.

  8. I’m bummed to be losing Aquatopia. It was a bit pointless, but that was part of its charm IMO. I’d argue that Aquatopia is better at doing what it set out to do than Stormrider OR Searider. The simulator is what ACTUALLY should be leaving IMO, and I don’t have faith that lightning will finally strike here the third time around.

  9. Aquatopia going does feel like something that needs to go. I’ve done it a few times but on going back yes it’s disappointing and very that’s it. Something to replace it is needed preferably still with kinetic energy.

    Makes mutters about how cape cod is ruined by being duffyville but it’s not aimed at me. especially not given ny grievances,dislike and failure to understand people liking the pink and purple dragon!

  10. I’ve only ridden Aquatopia once, but I enjoyed it. A bit more than something like Luigi’s ride in DCA, but not so much I’d consider it a sacred cow. Overall, I’d consider Mermaid Lagoon the weakest port from a theming perspective (though a very functional area for those with small children), but enhancing Port Discovery would be nice.

    1. Mermaid Lagoon and Port Discovery are undeniably the weakest two ports, but I think the difference is that there really isn’t squandered potential with Mermaid Lagoon (aside from the theater still sitting empty).

      Mermaid Lagoon set out to be an area to provide an indoor space for families with small children, plus some outdoor flat rides. It accomplishes exactly what it set out to achieve. It’s an inherently lower-ceiling concept, but it’s one that’s done well. I wouldn’t want Imagineering to touch Mermaid Lagoon–I think there’s a greater chance the redevelopment would be a step backwards than forwards.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *