Have you ever seen Walt Disney World or Disneyland covered under a blanket of freshly fallen snow during the winter? It’s long been a dream of ours to visit the parks during a blizzard, and despite it being one of our top Disney bucket list items, we sadly have not yet had that experience.
This might seem like an unrealistic or outlandish goal, the kind of freak event that happens once every 100 years. However, in the past several years, it has snowed a few times per year at Disneyland Paris and about once per year at Tokyo Disneyland. Social media goes crazy when that happens, and for good reason: the parks look absolutely gorgeous in the snow.
Of course, it’s incredibly unlikely that we’ll ever see a blanket of snow at Walt Disney World or Disneyland, due to the climates of Florida and California. Even if we keep visiting for 100 years and do get lucky with freak flurries at some point, a measurable amount of snowfall sticking is exceedingly unlikely. With that in mind, I decided to make a little photo magic happen on my own for this post…
Here, we share infrared photos from Walt Disney World, Disneyland, and Tokyo Disneyland that offer the impression of snow-covered parks. It’s definitely not the same as seeing or experiencing the real thing, but I was able to capture these images without getting frostbite, and you don’t have to wait 100 years (give or take) to see them, so this will have to be “good enough” for now.
Fair warning: from this point on, the text is pretty much talking shop about photography, so if you’re not keen on learning about how infrared photography works, you might just want to scroll through, enjoying the faux-flurries of snow at the Disney Parks I’ve ‘created’ with these images…
Infrared photography requires special filters or IR converted cameras. Don’t let that intimidate you, as it is fun and rewarding, as you’ll see from the sample photos here. Here we will help you learn what you need to know about infrared photography, give you an idea of what gear you’ll need to get started (it’s cheaper than you think!), and assist with basic post-processing!
First of all, what is infrared photography? It’s the process of capturing lightwith frequencies outside the visible spectrum of light that the human eye cannot see. There’s a bit more to it than that, but since I don’t understand science (at all), you’re going to need to look elsewhere for a further elucidation that isn’t made up, which is what mine would be.
Luckily, the camera can see infrared light. The camera’s sensor is sensitive to infrared light, but manufacturers a “hot mirror” filter in front of the sensor to block this light, so that only the “regular” visible light can reach the sensor. This filter blocks the vast majority of infrared light, but not all of it. By adding another filter on top of the lens that blocks visible light, regular DSLRs can be used to as infrared cameras as that little bit of infrared light that reaches the sensor is now the only light that reaches the sensor.
So, how can you get started in infrared photography? Let’s take a look at the options…
Before I got my infrared camera, I used one of those CHEAP-O filters, and it worked just fine for me…actually, it worked great considering the price.
The downside to using a filter is that really long exposures are required. Exposures that are 60 seconds or more in broad daylight. Exposure times are typically longer with newer cameras, as the camera manufacturers continue to improve upon the filters blocking infrared light, making them less sensitive to infrared light. With this method, you can use your camera mounted to a tripod for 60 plus second exposures in broad daylight.
Being lazy, impatient, and a big fan of infrared photography, I decided to take the plunge and bought an infrared DSLR. This DSLR, an infrared converted Nikon D70, had its hot mirror removed and shoots only in infrared. That’s the downside–it can’t take “normal” photos. The upside is that its exposure times are roughly equivalent to those coming from a regular camera, so no tripod is necessary for shooting in the broad daylight.
I went with the Nikon D70 because it was the cheapest camera I could find. In retrospect, I would strongly discourage anyone looking to take up infrared photography from going this route. The dynamic range isn’t good, the LCD screen is small, and the files are too small. Live and learn. The photos in this article were taken with this camera.
If I were to do it again, I’d simply buy a filter. In fact, before going the more expensive route, I strongly encourage most photographers to play it safe and buy the $26 infrared filter mentioned above. See if you like that, and go from there. As I’ve learned, infrared photography is one of those things that’s fun infrequently and in moderation, but it’s not worth dropping several hundreds of dollars for something you’ll use so sparingly.
If you want to maximize the potential and “look” of the infrared photos that you’re capturing go out and find some greenery. Infrared light tries to hide from us humans in trees and bushes, making foliage and flora shots the best bet for infrared photos. If you’re a cityscape, urban, or portrait photographer, you probably won’t have much luck with infrared photography.
If you’re a landscape photographer, you should have a lot of fun with infrared photography. I’ve found that the most interesting infrared photos are ones with a lot of foliage, but also a dark man-made structure in the frame. Since the man-made structure won’t be impacted by the infrared shooting, it will really pop in the photo. You can see what I mean in the sample photos on this page.
If you do elect to go with an older camera for your infrared conversion, be mindful when shooting into direct sunlight. Because of shortcomings in dynamic range and in differences with how the infrared camera handles light, these shots can be very difficult to process. I typically try to keep the sun out of my frame, even if shooting into the sun can add some really dynamic lens flare.
The next step is processing the photos you’ve captured. When you dump the photos onto your computer, you’ll find that most of them are very red. Most people don’t care for this look, and it is easily corrected by performing a red/blue channel swap in Photoshop.
Using the channel mixer, set the red channel to 0% red and 100% blue, and the blue channel to 100% red and 0% blue. Your mileage may vary on this, and you may find somewhere less extreme (say, 3% and 97%, 97% and 3%) is best. I haven’t found that to be the case yet, and actually now use a Photoshop Action because I got sick of doing this manually.
You’ll now have blues where there were once reds, and the image will look a lot more realistic, or at least as realistic as it gets with infrared photography. Unless your name is ALF, trees probably don’t normally look white to you. The image will still likely look a bit flat, which is normal with infrared photos prior to processing. You’ll want to do a curves adjustment, picking black and white points, which will also help further correct the colors.
I recommend doing this processing in Photoshop and using an adjustment layer for the curves processing. After correcting colors and adding the appropriate amount of contrast, I usually add a second adjustment layer (or brightness layer) to increase white levels (or brightness), masking out the areas that would otherwise be blown out if I brighten them. In writing it sounds difficult, but once you’re in front of a computer, it’s actually quite easy.
If you prefer a black and white look to your infrared photos, you can convert them to black and white instead of messing with a channel swap. I still usually open the channels palette to accomplish this, but there are any number of methods you can use—it’s just like a standard black & white conversion. You’ll still want to follow the tips above concerning the curves adjustment.
The end result, regardless of whether you stay in color or convert to black and white, is photos that look like they were taken after a heavy snowfall. So it’s not really snow, but in locations where I shot, real snow is something you’ll never see–which really adds to the effect, I think. And that’s all you need to know to get started!
Overall, infrared photography is a lot of fun, easy to master after the initial learning curve, and can produce some striking images. After all, how often do you see Cinderella Castle surrounded by a blanket of fresh powder? Sure, it’s not real snow, but it’s still something pretty novel that you don’t see every day at Walt Disney World!
What do you think of these infrared photos of the Disney Parks? Do these look like real snow to you, or are they unconvincing ‘fakes’? Do you also dream of visiting one of the parks as a winter wonderland? Any questions? We love hearing from readers, so please share any other thoughts or questions you have in the comments below!