Captain America: Civil War Review
This review takes a spoiler-free look at Captain America: Civil War, the latest film in what seems like a never-ending stream of super hero films. While this “never-ending” comment could be construed as a jab, when it comes to the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Disney and Marvel have done an excellent job structuring the MCU, creating action-packed films with heart and humor, and even different genres, all of which has helped prevent super hero “fatigue.” Civil War is no exception.
Despite my undeniable geekiness, somehow, that never extended to some “typical” interests. Rather than reading super-hero comics and watching Lord of the Rings in high school, I was reading Calvin & Hobbes and collecting Criterion Collection DVDs (that’s probably dorky more than geeky, but we’re splitting hairs). Point being, my familiarity with the characters in the Marvel Cinematic Universe extends only to the films in which the characters appear. I have no knowledge of the underlying conflict in the comics upon which Civil War is based. This lack of familiarity made me a bit apprehensive that the premise would be little more than a pretext for an undue super hero throw-down. Fortunately, those fears were unfounded. This film–as with the other MCU entries–is more about storytelling than it is action.
As someone with geeky propensities, I’ve really enjoyed how Marvel has built this universe, and used the films to engage in a sort of long-form storytelling. As geekiness has gone mainstream, it would appear the general public concurs. The Avengers was the first film that really converged the characters’ separate stories, and it did gangbusters at the box office.
While The Avengers demonstrated the potential of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Captain America: Civil War executes and delivers on that promise. It’s a very good standalone film, but an exceptional culmination of the stories and characters that have been developed in the films that preceded it. There’s a lot to love about Civil War, but it’s not without flaws. I’ll get those out of the way first.
The biggest disappointment for me is how little attention it gives to some of the characters beyond Captain America and Iron Man. Perhaps it’s because there are simply so many other characters, but it felt like there were a few that didn’t get a satisfying amount of on-screen attention (Hawkeye, in particular, seems superfluous and expendable to the story).
This is exemplified with the Sokovia Accords (for characters not present during the initial roundtable), as supporting players choose sides without exposition, and their decisions can seem arbitrary as a result. The political themes here are overt, not merely inferred subtexts, so it would be nice if the characters had motives beyond “Iron Man asked first!” In some cases, a greater understanding of the MCU provides insight into the “why,” but for a couple of characters, that’s not the case at all.
If this were an ordinary super hero film, this criticism could be construed as nitpicking. However, Marvel has redefined the concept. The result is films that offer thought-provoking story and themes to accompany the gripping blockbuster action sequences. Judged through that prism, I expected a bit more development of the central conflict over the Sokovia Accords before the action in the second and third acts kicked into high gear. I think this is an appropriate expectation, because, as was Captain America: The Winter Soldier, this is an intelligent film with lofty ideas and ideals.
When it comes to Captain America and Iron Man, the greatest conflicts are not physical. As the conflict relates to these characters, it builds rather well without explicit conversation of the Accords. Neither side is wholly wrong or right. Iron Man and Captain America are following their respective moral compasses, each is conflicted with their choices, and each shows emotional vulnerability. They also both make suspect decisions as a result of those emotions.
All of this is deftly conveyed in the film, as Civil War gives new depth to both Captain America and Iron Man. This is what makes their conflict so gripping when it spills over into the action sequences. There’s actual emotion turmoil at play, so it doesn’t feel like shallow and gratuitous super hero on super hero action. This emotional conflict also adds an element of unpredictability to some of the action sequences that would otherwise lack it.
Although this is a Captain America movie, I felt there was far more elucidation of Iron Man’s position than Captain America’s. Moreover, if anyone carries this impressive ensemble, I’d say it’s Iron Man, not Captain America. Clearly, Cap is relying upon his instincts in his steadfast opposition to the Sokovia Accords and other actions in the film. As an audience you are supposed to trust in him because he’s The Avengers’ moral beacon.
I didn’t feel he really offered any compelling justification, but maybe that’s okay. His saving grace here is how his character has been developed in the prior movies. This is a great advantage of the long-form nature of the movie: the filmmakers can rely upon audience goodwill towards the character and trust in him because his instincts have always vindicated him in the past.
In that, there’s also a real vindication of the long-form storytelling that the Marvel Cinematic Universe has built since Iron Man. As mentioned, Civil War works as a standalone film, but I feel those who have seen the other MCU films will get so much more out of it. Not just in terms of understanding throwaway nods to other characters or events, but in understanding how everything else has built towards this. It makes you feel more vested in the story & characters as a viewer, and it enables the filmmakers to tell the story here in under 6 hours.
It thus behooves you to see the other films in the MCU before a viewing of Civil War. Unless you’re living off the grid in some isolated desert commune, you’ve probably seen at least a couple of these films (and if you are in an isolated commune, you probably don’t have electricity and thus can’t read this, anyway). I’m not saying you should sit down for a marathon viewing of the dozen or so films that came before it; but viewing the the two previous Captain America films, Iron Man 3, and The Avengers: Age of Ultron will certainly help.
To talk only of “boring” things like ideology, themes, and story would do Civil War a great injustice. As great of a movie as this is, it’s also a great summer blockbuster. There are 3 scenes in particular that are true standouts, and one of those is the best I can recall from any Marvel film, which is quite impressive considering the nature of the scene. Not much more needs to be said about the action; suffice to say, it’s phenomenal.
Ultimately, Civil War excels because it manages to do so many different things so well, even with a bloated cast of characters and while juggling all of the stories that came before it. I think it falters a bit as a political thriller, but the drama, humor (here’s hoping Ant-Man gets more screen time in Infinity War!), and action are all exceptional, making for one of the best blockbuster films in recent memory.
Perhaps the most exciting thing about Civil War is where it leaves the story. Early in the review I called this film an “exceptional culmination.” The thing is, as much as the film is weaving together elements that have been developed before it as something of a crescendo, there is also a sense that this is the beginning of a seriously awesome chapter (or phase, I suppose) in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. The downside to that is that we’re in for a bit of a wait until that happens in 2018.
For updates, discount information, a free download of our Money-Saving Tips for Walt Disney World eBook, and much more, sign up for our free monthly newsletter!
If you enjoyed this post, we’d really appreciate it if you’d share it via social media to help spread the word. We put a lot of work into making this site a helpful planning resource, and hope it’s useful to you! 🙂
Your Thoughts…
Have you seen Captain America: Civil War? Which Marvel Cinematic Universe films have been your favorites? Do you like the “universe” concept for movies? We love hearing from readers, so please share your take (please, no spoilers) in the comments!
I read this review when it first came out and now that I’ve seen the movie (finally!) I’m ready to give my two cents. Full disclosure: I’m coming at this as someone who read the comic books. I’m not huge into comics and frankly I have a hard time with Captain America and Iron Man in the comics because there’s so much history and it’s impossible to figure out where to start. But a friend of mine told me to read the Civil War story line anyway, so I did. It’s been a few years since I read it, but from what I remember, the movie is completely different from the comics. I would argue that the movie is as much about Bucky and Helmut Zemo trying to tear down the Avengers as it is about the Sokovia Accords.
The comics are entirely focused around superhero regulation. Really the only bad guys are the superheroes themselves. Spiderman is pivotal in the comics, switching sides halfway through once he realizes how dangerous Iron Man’s side can be, whereas in the film he’s really just there for the big fight scene (he’s also like 15 years younger in the film). Maybe now is a good time to point out that in the comics the Superhero Registration Act (their Sokovia Accords) is as much about making their secret identities public as it is anything else. Seeing as no one really has a secret identity in the film outside of Spiderman, this wouldn’t have made sense to use in the movie. And in the comics Iron Man is really truly a villain. He seems to have a point at the beginning, but then he goes completely off the reservation, cloning Thor (who in turn kills Goliath), imprisoning people left and right and at the end of the day Cap gets imprisoned and assassinated (kind of), ushering in the age of Bucky Barnes as Captain America (which happens immediately after the civil war story line). I never read past this story line in the comics, so I don’t really know what happens from here, but I know that Cap does somehow get resurrected because comic book logic.
Having said all that, I’m really glad the executed it the way they did. Having Iron Man be reasonable was good for post-movie debating and I feel like the only way they could have done the comic story line justice is via TV mini series and they don’t have the rights to half the characters involved anyway. While Spiderman was really only there to set up the new Spiderman as a character, I thought his characterization was the best I’ve seen on film so far and they cast him really well. Also, I would like someone to make an Adventures of Bucky and Sam movie, because those two were fantastic in the few scenes they shared. I want to see it again, but when I walked out of the theater I remember being impressed that they basically packed two plots into one movie without it feeling overstuffed. That in and of itself is impressive. Layer onto that the emotional depth of the conflict and you have a winner.
I really liked this movie. My personal reasons for liking it mostly focus on Bucky. However, I thought the possibilities from a “future of intellectual property” perspective that spiderman’s appearance brought up were really interesting. Up until now, Disney hasn’t been able to include him in the movies because they don’t own the rights yet. I say “yet” because I think Disney has made it pretty clear that they really really want that IP. They managed to get him for this movie. We all know that that spiderman will have his own movie in 2017 but, while Disney is making the movie, Sony still owns the rights and has final creative authority.
There has already been (very minor) crossover between the spiderman cartoon on Disney channel and the Guardians of the Galaxy cartoon that follows the movie. Spiderman/Guardians crossovers have already happened in the comic books. I’m not saying that spiderman will be in the next guardians movie (I think they might be a ways off from that still) but I do think Disney not only wants the movie IP, I think they really want those Marvel rides out of Universal and to make a Marvel land. It’s a long ways from happening but, I think this appearance in Civil War might have been the first step in Disney claiming the rest of the Marvel IP.
When is Hawkeye not superfluous and expendable to the story? 😉 (Avengers 2 being the exception)
Awww, yeah! Shout-out to Calvin & Hobbes! 😉
Spot on Tom. It is a really good film but with some distinct flaws. The big airport fight scene as scene in all the trailers is excellent and feels like it came right off the pages of a comic book. The villain here is a little lackluster with somethings predicated on knowing a hero was going to do a certain thing so either he knows the future or it was in the script 🙂 Gotta say though, Winter Soldier was better but that does not mean in anyway this was a bad movie. All it is going to do is print money for Disney/Marvel. Oh and Spiderman, this is the best Spiderman we have seen on film and I’m already hyped for the solo movie.
I thought the airport scene was going to be a lame, going through the motions to satisfy the “Iron Man v. Captain America” hype, but it turned out to be the best fight scene in recent memory.
Personally, I found both of the major fight scenes in Age of Ultron to be a little corny and over the top–as if the only way to best prior movies is with a MORE MORE MORE mentality. This was much more to my liking.