Point And Shoot Camera Reviews
NOTE: This post is outdated and no longer useful. As of August 2014, my only current point and shoot recommendation is the Sony RX100. You can read our review for that here: https://www.disneytouristblog.com/sony-rx100-review/
Want to know what the best point and shoot camera is for your budget? Here I rank the top value-for-money point & shoot cameras available, give an overview of some of their useful features, and make recommendations as to how each camera might help better capture photos at Walt Disney World or Disneyland.
Creating this post was no easy task. In fact, out of all of the posts I’ve written, I’ve put the most work–by far–into this post. Over the course of the past month, I’ve read extensively about point and shoot cameras and I’ve tested point and shoot cameras at Wal-Mart, Target, Best Buy, and Sam’s Club. During this testing, I’ve learned a few things that probably will never have any value to anyone reading this, but I’ll share my “lessons” anyway, just in case, ya know, they might help even a couple of you out.
First, stores do not take kindly to you bringing in a camera to photograph other cameras. Out of all of the stores listed, I was only able to take photos at Sam’s Club, and even that was incredibly awkward. Second, stores do not take kindly to you bringing in your own memory card to use in the cameras you’re testing to obtain comparison test shots for later use. Explaining that you do camera reviews on your “blog” doesn’t make it seem any less sketchy to the store. Third, at least half of all cameras on display at stores are dead. I wonder how stores would have taken to me bringing my own battery charger or battery. Hmmm… Finally, Best Buy sales people are pushy. Maybe it’s just the Best Buy stores near us, but I shouldn’t have to listen to their (uninformed) spiels about what camera would be best for me after I’ve already told them I don’t need any help. Alright, now that I’ve imparted this useless wisdom upon you all, let’s get to the useful stuff.
The cameras below are ranked in order of how I favor them. I arrived at these rankings not only by comparing the substantive quality of each camera, but also the price of each camera. I also discounted for heavily marketed features that I felt were gimmicky or generally useless for most people. To that end, these rankings are more “value for money” rankings than they are a list of the outright best point and shoot cameras presently available. If cost is no issue and you just want the best point and shoot, stop reading and just buy the Canon G12. It also should be noted that this article does not review mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras (or “EVIL” cameras), so if you’re considering one of the higher end cameras on this list (such as the Canon G-series), but don’t want to move up in size to a DSLR, you really might want to check out cameras like the Olympus PEN E-PL2. That said, let’s delve into the point and shoot camera reviews, starting with our top choice!
#1 – Canon PowerShot S95 – I’m going to go ahead and nickname this camera the “giant-killer.” Okay, so it’s quite expensive in its own right, but it’s not nearly as expensive as the Canon G-series, and it’s significantly smaller (thus the “giant killer” name) and has most of the features of the G-series, plus very comparable image quality. Its biggest strengths for Disney, in my opinion, are its minimum aperture of f/2.0, its ability to shoot RAW, and its high ISO performance, which is quite impressive for a point and shoot. It lacks a lot of the external buttons, but it has full manual modes, and can produce some great photos when in the right hands. Obviously it’s no miracle worker, and it definitely doesn’t compare to even an entry level DSLR, but if you’re looking to take a pocket-sized camera to the parks that will give you great creative latitude, I will say with fairly strong certainty that this should be your choice. The only weakness of this camera that I could find is the 3.8x optical zoom, which is not much. While I use zoom lenses a decent amount at Disney, I don’t find zoom all that necessary at Disney parks (with the exception of Kilimanjaro Safaris and a couple stage shows). To put it fairly bluntly, I was quite surprised to find a point and shoot camera this size could do so much. The technology really has evolved in the last couple of years. This camera has me seriously considering selling my Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and instead just using the S95 plus a DicaPac Waterproof Digital Camera Case for underwater photography.
If you’re concerned with price or it’s not necessary that your camera be pocket-sized, keep reading the other reviews. Otherwise, this should be the camera you buy. As I’ve been researching these cameras, I’ve noticed the prices fluctuate at Abes of Maine and Amazon(links to the camera page on each site). Make sure to check both stores before purchasing, and don’t forget to use the coupon ABESAVES for $10 off the camera at Abes of Maine. Every little bit helps, right?
#2 – Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5V – If price does matter, this is the camera for you. It’s currently only $189 at Amazon, which is a downright steal. (It wasn’t even close to this price at the two stores I visited that carried it.) Based on my own criteria, there is a strong case for this camera being #1, as it has most of the features of the S95 and performs nearly as well, but its minimum aperture is only f/3.5, which makes quite a difference compared to the S95’s f/2.0 aperture in low-light situations. (Even if you don’t know what that means and don’t plan on using any manual modes, that will impact your use of the camera if you shoot in low-light.) The camera does have some features/advantages that I think are intriguing for use at Disney, such as GPS, top-notch HD video, and its 10x zoom.
If you aren’t sold on one of the first two cameras, I’m going to assume it’s because you don’t mind having a slightly larger camera, or because even at $189, the Sony DSC-HX5V is still too expensive. If neither of these assumptions are true, perhaps you should take read some external reviews of the S95 and its competitors and the DSC-HX5V and its competitors. These are the two cameras I recommend most highly of the ones I tested–by a long shot.
#3 – Panasonic DMC-FH25K – I feel like this is a camera that really flies under the radar. I haven’t read many glowing reviews, but in my testing, it really performed quite well and had a good “feel.” What it lacks in full manual settings (it does allow for some manual settings) it makes up for with its 28(!) scene modes and great image quality. It has some features I feel like were added for the sake of marketing, but none of these should have added any extra expense to the camera, so you’re not paying for what you don’t need. In my testing, the scene modes performed quite well if you chose the correct one (which should be relatively easy to do given their logical names), making this a great camera for anyone who is looking for great pictures made easy, and doesn’t plan on using full manual mode.
#4 – Olympus Stylus 5010 – At less than $100, this camera is an excellent option if you’re not interested in investing in the Sony DSC-HX5V or the Canon S95. It offers a tad more zoom than the S95 and is slightly smaller, but besides price, that’s where the advantages end. The images it produces don’t look as crisp or vivid, it can’t shoot RAW, it’s not good for low-light, and it just doesn’t offer the same breadth of features or settings as the two aforementioned models. It does allow for manual settings, which is nice, but I still feel as if this is the type of camera you give to a kid who is learning photography or someone just looking to snap random shots here or there. Then again, I value photos highly, and I am someone who looks at the astronomical expense of a Disney vacation and I wonder how on earth people could settle for anything but great photos to capture memories of their (expensive) vacations.
#5 – Canon PowerShot SX130IS – This camera isn’t as impressive as the Sony DSC-HX5V and it costs more. That said, on the gimmicky effects front, it is well-rounded. It has modes such as “fisheye” and “miniature” that are actually quite fun to play with, but really aren’t that useful for normal everyday use. That said, these modes are quite well-suited to use at Disney, and they can make a normal photo a lot more fun. The biggest “real” advantage of this camera is its 12x optical zoom. It also is great for macro photography (all you ‘food porn’ lovers!) and is capable of incredibly fast shutter speeds to freeze the action. However, it’s larger than the Canon S95 and Sony DSC-HX5V, and it’s low light performance is not as good as either of those two cameras. If zoom and those fun creative modes are really important to you, consider the SX130 IS, but otherwise, get the S95 or the DSC-HX5V.
#6 – Canon G12 – This is for those people who like the Canon S95, but want something with just a little more polish, features, and external buttons (which may not seem like a big deal, but when you’re using manual settings in the parks, these buttons are a HUGE time saver). This is probably the camera I have the most first-hand experience with due to borrowing it from a friend. It’s the closest to a DSLR I’ve ever seen in a point and shoot, but I can’t help but wonder if those considering this camera would be better suited by one of the aforementioned mirrorless cameras. They’re roughly the same size, they perform better, and fill the same “bridge” niche between point and shoots and DSLRs.
#7 – Kodak EasyShare Sport C123 Waterproof Digital Camera – This one is getting tacked on due to its incredibly low price and versatility. As I said in our underwater camera reviews, we didn’t spend much time playing with this camera. Honestly, I wasn’t all that impressed by it, either. That said, you can’t argue with a sub-$75 camera that is waterproof. If you want a cheap underwater camera and don’t expect to own it for the long haul, definitely consider this.
There are probably 15 other cameras we tested, but I’d rather be concise and offer my opinions as to what is best given certain constraints, rather than just throw up a bunch of reviews and have some of the better cameras get lost amongst the noise. I’m sure a lot of you will be dissuaded by the price of the Canon S95 (and perhaps its limited zoom), but it’s definitely the best option on this list for Disney vacations. As I said above, I look at it this way: a Disney vacation costs a lot of money. The memories of those trips are priceless. Given these two things, why skimp on a camera to capture photos of the priceless memories of your expensive vacation? Ultimately, I’d recommend everyone own at least an entry level DSLR, but I realize that’s an unreasonable recommendation because of its size and “intimidation factor.” That said, the Canon S95 is a great alternative to a DSLR, and it’s a point and shoot that you can expect to own for years to come. By contrast, the cheaper cameras on this list are more like “disposable” point and shoot cameras, that I suspect many people would outgrow in a year or so, and would move on to another camera. What I’m suggesting is that rather than going cheap, if at all possible, go with the Canon S95, which is a much higher quality camera with a higher “experience ceiling,” rather than a $100 camera now that you’ll outgrow in a year, and another $200 camera a year from now. That said, if you absolutely cannot justify the cost of the S95, consider the other options here, which offer a good number of features and are typically pretty high-quality for the price. (Except the Kodak, which is just listed because it’s waterproof and cheap!)
We hope this guide helps you and answers your questions about point and shoot cameras! If you are considering a purchase of any camera or photo gear (or anything else for that matter—just navigate to the product you want once you get to Amazon or Abes from our links—it all helps!), we would greatly appreciate it if you use the links in this post to make your purchase. They benefit the site and help us to keep providing you with useful content!
As always, if you have any questions, please leave them in the comments, and I will do my best to help steer you towards the best camera for your circumstances. If you found this article helpful, please give it a Facebook “Like” or Google +1 at the top of the page to help spread the word!
Are there any Nikon’s you suggest?
Thank you very much for the review and comparison.
I have a Canon SX130IS for last 4 yrs. It is very good in overall except for low light conditions. 2x AA rechargeable batteries can be used for a very long time either on video or photo. Recommended to use external flash for covering a function. More useful feature in this camera is HD 720P video 25/30 fps – PAL/NTSC with super quality.
In general, I found that the Sony camera picture quality (even under low light) is great (in cameras available in 2014 ).
Tom – Noticed that none of the Nikon point & shoot cameras are on your list. Did they not measure up? Thoughts on any of these?
So how does the Sony Rx100 compare?
The Sony RX100 blows all of these cameras out of the water. I need to update this page.
I just started playing with the rx100. I feel a bit clumsy on some of the switches..
But the picture quality, wow. In-camera HDR is not a joke. The only post processing you need is cropping — which retroactively gives you a huge zoom lens.
My dslr may start gathering dust now.
I love your site! Just an FYI on this post though, I just followed your link to the Sony Cyber-shot on Amazon, it has a “list” price of $349.00 and an Amazon price of $310.00 (compared to the $189 like your post says). A little misleading since the Canon PowerShot (#1 rate) is only $25 more than the Sony Cyber-shot (#2).
I don’t see a timestamp for your post (maybe I missed it?) but from the commments, this post is a little dated (about 12+ months).
Anyway, still a lot of great information in this review! Thanks again!
Thanks for the review Tom, I ordered the Sony Cyber-Shot DSC HX5V today on Amazon. The price is up to $279 now, but this is less than other sites. I can’t wait to get it and use it when we return to WDW in July. I love this web site and visit it every day. My sister and mother are both wonderful photographers with very sophisticated equiptment. I am just an amateur who enjoys taking decent photos of my family at play.I bet this one will do that and more.
Good luck with the camera!
I have the DSC-HX5V. I got tired of having a video camera and photo camera. When we went to Disneyland Christmas in 2010 after my first day I went to bestbuy and ended up getting this camera. It was great. I got excellent pics and video of Disneyland Christmas.
This one does it all. It will shoot 10 frames per sec. take high quality video, instantly switch between camera and video mode. The best/easiest panoramic shots, just hold the button and move it across your scene. instant panoramic shot. No stitching of frames together. Scene+ mode that will instantly take a second photo with alternate settings. Intelligent mode that does a grst job on 90% of photos you want. Manual modes. 10X optical zoom.
Smile setting for when you take the picture of yourself at arms length, it waits till you smile to take the pic. Super easy to use. all the modes come up on the screen with descriptions.
I highly recommend this camera.
Tom, great review! With the upcoming release of the Canon PowerShot S100 during November 2011,the price of the S95 should drop. Would you take advantage of the bargains or wait to purchase the new “upgrade”? Are the enhancements worth the extra cost? Thanks!
Dennis, I’m wondering the same thing! Looking forward to seeing reviews of the S100 to decide.
I love your reviews and am hoping you can help! I bought a Canon S95 to replace my SD 880 (which I LOVED!) and I do not like the pictures I am getting with the S95 at all. They are dull and blury, so much more than my SD880 ever was.
Is there something I can do to fix it? I have been mainly using Auto mode and my pictres are not true color, they are just so so dull! Thanks so much for any help!
I’m pretty excited to see that you ranked my camera (S95) as the top point and shoot. I pre-ordered it before it came out last year and absolutely love it, but it’s nice to see affirmation from others as well.
Really nice review Tom! The S95 is very temping but I’m leaning towards a compact mega zoom. With two kids 3 and 6 taking the DSLR to WDW seems to have reached it’s breaking point for me. I’m currently stuck deciding between the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V, Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 or Canon PowerShot SX230 HS. If you have a moment I’d be interested in your thoughts on it?
For everyone else looking into these “serious compacts,” I’d suggest looking into:
Ricoh GRD III
Panasonic LX3 + LX5
Pentax Q (when it’s released and reviewed)
At a certain point, the prices for compacts encroach into DSLR/mirrorless territory, and you have to compare image quality, compactness, and price.
My wife and I have been shooting with the XZ-1 in Antelope Canyon (when it is much darker in the canyon than with noon lighting) and at Disney World’s Epcot fireworks (the XZ-1 has a specific fireworks mode that works well handheld and excellent with a tripod). One can attach a viewfinder to it for shooting in bright sunlight. There is very little time lag with the shutter release. This allows one to capture fast moving grandkids and dogs instead of blurs and empty frames of where they were. I have found the camera to be quite good for when I do not want to carry my Canon or Hasselblad cameras (much heavier and much bigger). Now there has been released the new XZ-2 with an even better sensor with the same F1.8 / F2.5 lens. This will now be my new “walk about” camera when I am not shooting with my bigger cameras. It really is one of the best compact cameras around.
Thank you for this summary. As much as I’d like an entry level DSLR the most important feature to me in a travel camera is pocketability. I did a database search on DPReview for all compacts with a max aperture of 2.0 or wider. One other contender came up: Olympus XZ-1. It’s a little more expensive but is faster throughout its zoom range, slightly longer zoom, slightly larger sensor. Reviews seem to complain about menu access to some features. Have you looked at this one? Any thoughts?
Rick, please read my reply to JP’s comment which is right after yours.
I downgraded from a Nikon D2x to a Canon G12 last year. As fun as it was to be mistaken for a photo journalist everywhere I went, the D2x was far too much camera for me. The G12 takes decent enough photos for as little effort as it takes. It can be a bit “noisy” in lower light and pictures will always look better on the built-in viewfinder screen than on my computer. Still, I greatly appreciate the physical viewfinder.
The shape of the G12 reminds me of the cameras my parents would use when I was a kid. Overall I have really enjoyed it. My biggest pet peeve: the power button and the shutter button are right next to one another and are roughly the same size and shape. I have turned my camera off instead of taking a picture several times.
I have #3, the Lumix. I never really liked it, mostly because I have no idea what most of these scene selections mean. All this time I thought it was a crappy camera, then you go and list it as the 3rd best. This confirms the suspicions of my friends: that I am stupid when it comes to camera. Perhaps I should read the instructions?
Somewhat more seriously, this camera sucks for fireworks. I know there is a “fireworks” scene mode, but even then they just don’t come out well. It is very good for food, however (a good third of all the pics I take!).
Do you use a tripod for fireworks? If not, there’s your problem (not the camera).
Nope, never even thought of it. If that’s what it takes to get good pics of fireworks, I’ll just give up and look at yours instead 🙂
Yep. You’re going to be hard pressed to get good fireworks photos without a tripod, even if you use a $9,000 camera!
Tom, you’re incorrect about the inability of a $9,000 camera to take good fireworks pictures without a tripod. My lowly D300 produced some amazing fireworks pictures with the castle in the foreground when I went to Disney. I was using 1/30 shutter, ISO 800, @ f/1.8 . Varying between 1/30 and 1/60 for the ten-minute show, it produced fabulous 8x10s- all without a tripod or VR. A point and shoot with a much smaller sensor would be problematic, but some of the newer batches can do it, as well.
Thanks so much for this review Tom! I have to say it proved what I was thinking and that the Sony Cybershot that I had (before it broke) was the best camera for the money. This just proved it again…looks like I’m going to have to try to buy that Sony camera.
The one thing that I would like to warn your readers is that usually with Sony’s they have a special memory card, called a memory stick. So you will have to buy their version. (This was true with my old camera, though I’ll be honest, that camera was a few years old…they could have changed their sticks to the standard memory cards.)
Yeah, I hate Sony’s proprietary memory card. It costs more, and offers no distinct advantages. Of course, Sony likes it, because it makes them more money!
The HX5V uses the Sony memory if you want the wireless transfer. If you want to do USB cable transfer you can use regular Sd memory. I had Class 10, 16GB and 32GB memory cards that work just fine for pics and video.
This is a fantastic review. I’ve been really wanting to get a new point and shoot, but haven’t been able to do any of the research myself yet. This makes it so much easier. I definitely know where to focus my attention now. Thank you for the excellent reviews.
I’ve got the Sony Cybershot and think it is a great camera for me as I know nothing about photography and this was a great value (not quiet as good as the Amazon price) while still giving me a few advanced features easy enought to figure out. I love the panoramic feature and used it to get some great shots of World Showcase in January, and can not wait to put that 10x zoom to use on the Safari in AK next month.
I have no idea what aperture is or how it relates to my pictures, but I will say that I “lost” many school programs of my kids because I couldn’t figure out how to get the low light pictures. I’ve got it figured out now, mostly, but it ws frustrating to say the least. Overall, I’m glad that I have a camera that you seem to recommend and approve of!
This is was so helpful! Thanks!!