Imagineers Reveal Inspiration for Cars Area of Frontierland in Magic Kingdom

Imagineering has pulled back the curtain on the Cars miniland in Magic Kingdom, revealing the natural environments, animated stories, U.S. National Parks and other Disney Parks lands & areas that are serving as the inspiration. This covers how all of that will influence the themed design, architecture, scenic beauty–and even one of the original characters–in the Piston Peak subsection of Frontierland at Walt Disney World.

These newly-revealed details about the Cars land coming to Walt Disney World come via a presentation we attended led by key Imagineers working on the Magic Kingdom project. During this, they discussed what they’re using for inspiration on the Cars area, while also revealing new concept art, sketches, photos from research trips, and a treasure trove of other visuals.

Most significantly, they shared video of the Cars miniland model and a fly-through around the perimeter of the land. All together, this painted a picture of how the Tom Sawyer Island and Rivers of America replacement will take shape, bringing the land into sharper focus than previously-released details at D23 and concept art released shortly thereafter.

Before we get off to the races, let’s quickly bring you up to speed on these Magic Kingdom additions. According to Disney, these Cars attractions will be set outside of Radiator Springs, as the franchise heads west into exciting new frontiers. On this adventure, guests will be able to experience not one but two exciting new Cars-themed attractions.

The marquee attraction is not a clone of Radiator Springs from Disney California Adventure. It’s a new story and setting that goes beyond what was established in the Cars film franchise. Same goes for the secondary ride–it’s not Mater’s Junkyard Jamboree or Luigi’s Rollickin’ Roadsters, but it is expected to be a small flat ride (so similar idea).

One of the two all-new Cars attractions will invite you on a rally race through the mountains that offers family fun and thrills, excitement and humor. Take on wild terrain as you race across the landscape climbing mountain trails, dodging geysers and — Mater’s favorite — splashing through mud holes.

Imagineers explained that Frontierland at Magic Kingdom is unlike some other incarnations of the land, such as the version at Disneyland Paris. France’s Frontierland is also known as the fictional town of Thunder Mesa, and is set in a distinct time and place; it also has an elaborate backstory (one of my personal favorites) that weaves together all of the attractions and restaurants in the land, and executes fantastic world-building.

By contrast, the version of Frontierland at Magic Kingdom has always been more of a hodgepodge (my word, not WDI’s). As the Imagineers explained, it features a variety of settings and time periods, and mirroring America’s westward expansion as you venture deeper into the land from the colonial America setting of Liberty Square.

This includes the Midwest via the St. Louis-inspired Diamond Horseshoe, the ‘Northern Woods’ of Country Bear Musical Jamboree, Southwest States via Pecos Bill Tall Tale Inn & Cafe, New Orleans-inspired Tiana’s Bayou Adventure, and the American Southwest of Big Thunder Mountain Railroad. Even before the reimaginings of the Country Bear Jamboree and Splash Mountain, the Magic Kingdom would’ve had the most ‘malleable’ Frontierland of any version to exist.

From all of this, Disney determined that the thesis, of sorts, for Frontierland at Magic Kingdom is ‘chasing your dreams in the American Wilderness and writing your own folktale.’ The marquee attraction coming to the new area (which we’ll refer to as Cars Rally Race, even though that’s not its official name) is the ‘fastest lap in the West.’ That’s the framework for this new Cars area of Frontierland and the attraction.

With its centralized location in Frontierland, Imagineering has chosen to orient the natural environment of the Cars area around the Rocky Mountains. This area of the Western United States spans the Continental Divide and encompasses protected mountains, forests and alpine tundra, all of which we’ve already seen from the concept art for the Cars land.

To prepare for the project, the Imagineering team visited Rocky Mountain National Park in Colorado for a research trip. There, they got acquainted with the natural beauty and diversity of those landscapes, as well as the architecture of that and other National Parks in the American West.

This was excellent to hear. Rocky Mountain National Park ranks #9 on my highly-scientific power rankings of U.S. National Parks, and is one of the few that checks all of the right boxes for this particular project. I might’ve personally preferred Glacier as the inspiration, but Rocky Mountain is a fantastic alternative. It’s also a National Park that Imagineering hasn’t really drawn inspiration from in the past, so something fresh is nice to see.

Imagineers shared that the natural environment of the Cars area of Frontierland will draw inspiration from Rocky Mountain National Park, and so too will the architecture. In this case, it’s more the U.S. National Parks of the American West as a whole, and not RMNP, specifically.

The architecture is directly inspired by the classic style of ‘Parkitecture’ or National Park Service rustic. This design combines natural materials, such as whole logs and rocks, and appears as if it’s built by hand. The goal was design to blend into landscapes instead of imposing upon them.

You’ll see exemplars of Parkitecture throughout the Western National Parks, in entrance gateways, visitor centers, in-park hotels, and other infrastructure. There’s also a distinct graphic style of the U.S. National Parks, and that will also be drawn on for signage and visuals within the Cars area of Frontierland.

Imagineers shared that ‘Parkitecture’ will be the primary style of the Cars area, with various buildings featuring this rustic look that blends materials from the natural wood with whimsical items found in the ‘Cars’ world. In their words, it’ll be ‘Parkitecture’ meets ‘Car-itecture.’

This means lower windows on buildings so they’re at car-level, porte-cocheres that can accommodate cars, and other whimsical car-forward characteristics. There might be a window in the shape of a wheel well as the defining characteristic of a gift shop or other building. (This should not require much imagination to envision given that ‘Wheel Well Motel’ is a place in the Cars universe. The feature is like that, but smaller and primarily in the Parkitecture style.)

Then there’s the the entrance and queue to the Cars Rally Race attraction, which is inspired by the iconic steeply-sloped roofs of U.S. National Park Lodges or Welcome Centers (think Old Faithful Inn or the Lodge at Bryce Canyon). Based on what we saw, this should be the piece of architecture that punctuates the landscape of the Cars area.

If you’ve seen Planes: Fire & Rescue, this might all sound familiar as a setting that already exists in the expanded Cars cinematic universe: Piston Peak National Park, a setting that was inspired by Yosemite and Yellowstone National Parks according to Pixar’s animators.

We’ve discussed Piston Peak National Park here before, saying it would be the perfect backdrop for the Cars area at Magic Kingdom. Well, we’re getting our wish! Imagineers confirmed that this land will pull from Piston Peak National Park, quite liberally and perhaps literally in some ways.

While Imagineers were careful to point out that they’re not building directly upon Planes: Fire & Rescue, it sounds as if that’s from the perspective of canon and storytelling. Because they mentioned specific buildings in the land that are pulled from Piston Peak, and even signage revealed at entry points shows guests entering Piston Peak National Park.

This should mesh well with Frontierland. Piston Peak National Park can easily pass for what the Western National Parks looked like prior to the Mission 66 project, a post-war proposal to spend $1 billion over 10 years to modernize the U.S. National Parks post-World War II amidst the automobile boom in the United States.

In watching the fly-through video of the Cars area and model, it was clear that the land is leaning heavily into Parkitecture and the rugged and varied landscape of the American West. But one thing also stuck out that was mercifully not present–the added layer of RSN broadcast stuff, which was in the concept art presented at D23 (see above).

Now, it’s possible that this is just missing from what we saw and Imagineering still intends upon adding the Racing Sports Network overlay, but I sure hope not. In previous commentary, this was one of our biggest complaints–that it looked like Imagineering is repeating a mistake made with the original circa-2001 Grizzly Peak Recreation Area at DCA. In a nutshell, the bones of that were an 1800s mine, repurposed into an extreme sports facility. It looked tacky, with late 1990s X-Games sensibility that aged poorly.

Hopefully, Imagineering has realized the RSN layer is visually incongruous with the timeless natural and manmade beauty of the U.S. National Parks-inspired setting. While Frontierland is malleable, adding that broadcast stuff just makes the setting too modern.

Thankfully, a middling spin-off sequel is not the only work of Disney animation serving as inspiration for the Cars area. Imagineers indicated they’re digging deep into the back catalogue, including some Walt Disney-era animated shorts and films.

It was difficult to clock all of these, but examples of possible inspiration include “Hold That Pose” (1950), “Rugged Bear” (1953), “Grin and Bear It” (1954), “Bearly Asleep” (1955), “Beezy Bear” (1955), as well as shorts and comics featuring the Junior Woodchucks (Huey, Dewey, and Louie).

While these characters will be not featured in the Cars area, that classic animation is serving as inspiration. Personally, I wouldn’t be surprised to see nods to the Junior Woodchucks and Humphrey the Bear, among others, via Easter Eggs. Imagineering usually makes this type of land fairly detail-dense, with roadside diners and bric-a-brac shops that are jam-packed with hidden details.

One specific animated short that’s serving as more meaningful inspiration is “Grand Canyonscope,” a Donald Duck animated short released in 1954. In this, Donald Duck is taking a tour of Grand Canyon National Park. Although he just wants to enjoy the beautiful space, this is made all but impossible by the constant admonishment from the rulebook-wielding tour guide: none other than Ranger J. Audubon Woodlore.

Imagineering revealed that Ranger J. Audubon Woodlore is inspiring an original new theme park character in the Cars land: Ranger J. Autobahn Woodlore.

This new character will appear as an Audio Animatronics figure in the queue for the Cars Rally Race attraction, and will look strikingly similar to the classic character, reimagined in Cars form.

We had the chance to see early concept art and footage of Ranger J. Autobahn Woodlore, which looks and sounds fantastic. (Think Mr. Potato Head in the Toy Story Mania queue.) The audio for the character was pulled directly from “Grand Canyonscope,” and worked perfectly as an amusing pre-show and safety spiel hybrid. (Think the new Muppets pre-show to World of Color: Happiness.)

Ranger J. Autobahn Woodlore alone has me more excited for and optimistic about Cars Rally Race.

Both as a fan of Audio Animatronics (the more, the better) and for what it represents. Pulling from “Grand Canyonscope” means digging deep into the archives, and demonstrates that the team handling this project knows their stuff and is handling it lovingly.

This is also evident from the other past Disney Parks projects mentioned as inspiration for the Cars miniland in Magic Kingdom.

The obvious one here is Grizzly Peak at Disney California Adventure, which is inspired by California’s beautiful National Parks. Equally important is the adjacent Grizzly Peak Airfield, which is a reimagining of Condor Flats that occurred after DCA’s big overhaul to improve the park and make it more timeless.

The team that worked on Grizzly Peak Airfield did a fantastic job, and it’s a lovely little miniland. Smokejumpers Grill is a good template for the type of Easter Eggs we might see in the Cars area at Magic Kingdom, especially if this project includes a restaurant reimagining. Although I don’t know one way or the other, I wouldn’t be surprised if some of the Imagineers who worked on Grizzly Peak Airfield are now on this Cars project. I hope so!

Another more recent project that’s near and dear to my heart is Camp Woodchuck at Tokyo Disneyland. The Imagineers working on the Cars miniland also mentioned this project by name.

For those who aren’t familiar with it, Camp Woodchuck actually has some parallels to what’s about to happen at Magic Kingdom. This is located in a corner of Westernland along the Rivers of America, replacing the old Lucky Nugget Cafe walk-up window and its primitive seating area with a multi-story indoor restaurant and character encounter complex. The big difference is that it carved an area out along the waterfront, rather than replacing the Rivers of America wholesale. Minor detail. 

Point being, Camp Woodchuck is an incredible enhancement and not just because it made something out of nothing. It’s also lovingly done, with a deep respect and understanding to Disney history. Beyond that, it just has a spectacular sense of place. Sarah and I have spent many a chilly evening in that second level, soaking up the atmosphere and eating whatever weird sandwich is being served. It’s not a marquee Tokyo Disneyland location, but it’s something special. If the Imagineers working on the Cars miniland in Magic Kingdom are able to craft a similar atmosphere, they might just pull this project off.

Based on the model, fly-through video and the rest of the presentation, I came away feeling reassured about the Cars miniland in Magic Kingdom. Not to the point that I’m actively in favor or this plan to replace the Rivers of America with talking Cars; I still have serious misgivings about how this will irrevocably alter the character and charm of Magic Kingdom.

Rather, this reassured me that Imagineering understands the assignment, and that this Cars miniland is in capable hands. The project team clearly loves Disney history, classic animation, and Walt Disney World as a whole. They “get it” and will do everything in their power to lovingly create a land worthy of the American West and spirit of Frontierland.

It also helps that a couple of key Imagineers on the Cars miniland themselves have a track record of making lemonade out of lemons, and turning questionable decisions from management into the best-case scenario. The Imagineers leading the Cars miniland have worked on several fan-favorite projects in the last 15 years. This includes two attractions that garnered backlash from diehard Walt Disney World fans upon announcement (including us!), but have since become beloved (including with us!).

There has already been much debate over whether Cars can work in Frontierland. Actually, it’s been less ‘debate’ and more ‘complaints,’ with most fans expressing skepticism, to put it charitably. I’ve already added my own entry into this genre: Can the Cars Franchise Fit Frontierland?

When it comes to matters of timeline, lore, setting or story, my perspective is more ‘relaxed’ than many fans. My view is that the American frontier is as much a spirit as it is an era. That sense of rugged individualism, manifest destiny, big folklore, and western exploration–all of it is as much an ethos as it is an era.

As America gets older and the 1800s are further in the rearview mirror, the case could be made that the bygone era of the U.S. National Parks and the Mission 66 boom are all part of that spirit. It was a different time in America, but one that embodied a similar sentiment as the “go west, young man” age.

The America of today is further removed from that automotive boom and heyday of the western ‘Great American Road Trip’ than Walt Disney was from the Old West when he dreamt up the concept of Frontierland. At least as far as the passage of time is concerned, the middle of the last century is already older than the Old West was in the 1950s.

Thematic purists will likely be far less forgiving, arguing that any cars (lowercase or uppercase) do not belong in a land with “frontier” in the name. As a threshold matter, they’ll contend that talking cars with eyes are wholly inappropriate for this portion of the park, making this a non-starter no matter how well executed.

For me, the U.S. National Parks are a quintessential element of the Western United States and the American spirit that could fit fine in Frontierland. Talking cars with eyes don’t bother me in the least, especially since this is Magic Kingdom, which always has lands imbued with a sense of fantasy. If we can have singing bears that tell jokes, we can have cars with eyes that tell jokes.

Then again, I’m also a realist about it, and also know there’s no way on earth Walt Disney World is adding more stuff themed to cowboys and indians. If it’s going to exist into the future, Frontierland is always going to be about the frontier spirit of America rather than that particular era. That’s just the truth of the matter. It’s always going to be a compromise, and classic cars (and Cars) in a 1950s National Park setting is one that I can completely get on board with.

Ultimately, I’m accepting of a Piston Peak National Park area in Frontierland with the breathtaking landscapes of Rocky Mountain National Park, Cars-itecture meets Parkitecture, kinetic energy via water and other placemaking. Again, thematic purists may still scoff at this, but I think this could work if lovingly done with respect to the Magic Kingdom and Frontierland. Imagineers really could pull it off.

An area and attractions themed to Piston Peak National Park evokes the era and atmosphere they’d expect to see in a rustic land themed to the frontier, even if it’s no longer set in the precise era as it was in 1971. Things change over the course of 50+ years, and a shifting of that setting makes sense. For me, this still has the potential to be quintessential Americana–the kind that belongs in a Disney theme park–as the U.S. National Parks are America’s Best Idea. They deserve to be celebrated, even if in fantasy-form, at Walt Disney World.

Planning a Walt Disney World trip? Learn about hotels on our Walt Disney World Hotels Reviews page. For where to eat, read our Walt Disney World Restaurant Reviews. To save money on tickets or determine which type to buy, read our Tips for Saving Money on Walt Disney World Tickets post. Our What to Pack for Disney Trips post takes a unique look at clever items to take. For what to do and when to do it, our Walt Disney World Ride Guides will help. For comprehensive advice, the best place to start is our Walt Disney World Trip Planning Guide for everything you need to know!

YOUR THOUGHTS

What do you think of this Rocky Mountain National Park inspiration for the Cars miniland in Magic Kingdom? Looking forward to seeing Ranger J. Autobahn Woodlore? Cautiously optimistic that Imagineers can make lemonade out of lemons with a new land similar to Grizzly Peak mixed with Cars Land, with Parkitecture meets Cars-itecture? Do you think the Cars franchise is capable of fitting thematically into Frontierland? Otherwise, what’s your reaction to Cars rides coming to Magic Kingdom? Do you agree or disagree with our assessments? Any questions we can help you answer? Hearing your feedback–even when you disagree with us–is both interesting to us and helpful to other readers, so please share your thoughts below in the comments!

You might also like...

39 Comments

  1. Hi Tom, I read your linked posting from travelcaffeine and stumbled into your posting about the diving board at Yosemite NP. Your “most satisfying sunset photo of all-time” does not show up but you made me very curious.
    Btw I like the NP theme in the artworks but I am against the replacement. If they were to replace the caves in Adventureland in my home park, DLP, I would be very upset.

    1. Tom, I am confused. Recently, I saw an article on Piston Peak Park (I thought it was yours) with drawings designed by Disney Imagineers. It showed lots of waterfalls with numerous trees. There was no dirt road nor dust! It also seemed to imply that the two rides Disney is creating would be indoors.
      When I saw that article, I thought there might be hope of recreating this beautiful area close to the way it is now. Having the rides hidden in rustic buildings, along with many waterfalls and numerous trees, would at least create a true scene of the American Wilderness. A natural scene without racing cars.
      My confusion – when the Imagineers visited the Rocky Mountain National Park, did they see dusty dirt roads? Did they see racing cars? What type of land are they designing for Magic Kingdom?
      In my opinion, if they create something like the drawings in this article, the Imagineers will be taking lemonade and turning it into lemons!

  2. Great article Tom! Your discussion is excellent at providing solid information in a clear fashion.
    I am very excited about how this is coming together. It is satisfying to hear that the Imagineering team is sensitive to the existing Disney canon. I can’t wait!

  3. This sounds a lot better than what was previously shared! And looking at the new concept art it looks like not all of Rivers of America will be removed so that’s also positive!

  4. I appreciate this insight so much – especially how you caught the removal of the RSN focus that permeated so much of the earlier concept art. I get that it’s a Cars ride, but comparisons to Grizzly Peak and Rocky Mountain NP for inspiration are heartening to hear. Really hoping they are leaning toward more of that vs the Cars theme – but not holding my breath until we see a finished result. It feels like a cartoony vibe would be easier/cheaper to execute (what do I know) but here’s hoping budgetary restrictions down the line don’t lead to that!

  5. Yeah, I do not know. TBH, we are a long time Disney family over 3 generations and have maybe been twice to TSI over the years. It was nice to look at as you strolled by or perhaps to go over there for a break. It is too bad they could not have expanded north of that area to keep it intact. The whole Orlando property has become a mishmash of IP that does not make sense. What should be at Hollywood Studios ends up at Epcot. There is little flow to the parks now. A lot of first timers cannot even tell you what park they visited when they return from their vacation. I guess the company does not give a rats ass about the American parks. They are more interested in selling rights to overseas. The Abu Dhabi project will likely be the most impressive of them all. Imagine an endless budget and creative freedom.

    1. I could not agree with this more. The parks are a total hodge podge and Epcot is the worst. Experimental Prototype Community Of Tomorrow? Walt’s vision is dead. Disney just doesn’t care anymore and throws whatever wherever.

  6. As you mentioned, a huge part of the concern is centered around how the river’s presence feels. I’m not a stickler about specific years, and it would actually be very cool if a national parks area (that didn’t revolve around Cars specifically) was a true expansion to Frontierland. I don’t think most people would argue with that. But very modern-looking cartoony vehicles (going from artwork) racing around a national park-like setting having anything to do with the American spirit of exploration is a massive stretch. I mean, we all know that this is not being done to enhance the theming…it’s being done despite it. It’ll be interesting to see if imagineers are capable of making the end product feel right.

  7. I think the ship has sailed on complaining that something doesn’t belong in a certain spot because Disney clearly stopped caring about that awhile ago. My main issue is they should be building behind BTM as they initially indicated a couple of years ago and not removing what they are. Blessing of size is the phrase that is always touted but it seems to mean nothing these days unless it involves building a DVC property. Pretty much everyone likes an atmosphere that involves seeing water in some capacity, so removing it just seems short sighted. As you’ve said many times, it’s something small that adds so much. So it’s hard for me to give them any credit for this when they could essentially have both areas. I do agree that imagineers still do a great job where they are able too based on resources allocated to them, but I don’t trust at this point that it won’t ultimately be gutted by budget cuts as most recent projects have been that don’t include adding hotel occupancy.

    1. Hi agree! Why can’t they build cars land elsewhere and keep Rivers of America! I thought they had a lot of land! Disgusting!

  8. Another strong article. We view this as an EPCOT-level overhaul project—ambitious and full of potential—which we genuinely want to see succeed. However, we already anticipate budget cutting emails driven by corporate cost-control measures are being sent. Delivering true separation, cohesion, and immersion—similar to what was achieved with Pandora: The World of Avatar—requires consistent on-site presence and investment throughout the entire development process. Ideally, we hope for Tokyo Disney-level theming and execution but that will never happen. Meanwhile, competitors in the area continue to innovate and grow their market share. We once hoped that moving Imagineering to Orlando would lead to improvements in food, entertainment, and overall execution. Unfortunately, leadership always seems to view Florida merely as a cash cow, requiring minimal creative effort and execution.

  9. Great article! I wasn’t excited about this project before but I am now. Your photos are beautiful as always- love the photo of the riverfront. I wish we walked there in the evening on our trip to soak in that atmosphere.

    I’ve been doing some research on Disney blogs and signed up for a few more newsletters. I got your breaking news first and the format of your newsletter is far superior to the other one I received on this development. You’ve probably seen this Reddit but if not, thought you’d enjoy reading it: https://www.reddit.com/r/disneyparks/comments/17jtox9/disney_blogs/. Your blog is the best!

  10. Watch out – many of the people complaining about the changes were kids in the 50s and 60s. They’re not going to like hearing that time was in the distant past for kids visiting Disneyworld today.

    1. I wasn’t a kid in the 50’s/60’s … why do you say that. My wife and I are younger parents with young kids. My three kids were finally at the perfect age and we planned/wanted them to explore Tom Sawyer island and have the Riverboat imprinted as that great memory for the park. TSI was designed by Walt, the Rivers were the best at feeling you were not stuck in a concrete park. The park original elements were great enough that they created wonder and became IPs themselves, while now they just take IPs and generically try to force and shove them in reverse.

    2. I was on Tom Sawyer’s Island at the Magic Kingdom last week. We were in the fort when three little boys zoomed past me yelling about the rifles up top. One of the boys was speaking Spanish and came right up to me to shout,” The rifles are up here and here and even over there and you can shoot out the windows!” Then he took off to join his new friends. My point is that as a beautiful place for kids to run around and let off steam, the loss of Tom Sawyer’s Island is a travesty. These kids are losing out more than the people brought up in the 50’s and 60’s. When these kids next come to Disney World and ask to go running around on the Fort they won’t be able to. They will be stationary, waiting in line for the Cars ride.

  11. Travesty. The National Park theming sounds fine, that was never the problem, but they should build ONTO not OVER the existing Rivers and TSI if they were determined to do this. The Car’s element spoils even that. Most of all this dashes my chance of ever getting my kids to TSI to explore. October trip just went from exciting one in lifetime to, disappointing and probably decidedly last visit.

    1. LM Kim – if you every have the chance to go to Tokyo Disneyland take your kids. This is a Disney park that knows how to keep Walt’s dreams alive. They have and continue to build scenes of Disney movies with a ride within the movie set.

  12. As I noted on the other post, this looks excellent. Any chance Disney will release the fly-through video for the public? Or better yet, a video of the presentation and Q&A?

  13. Ok wait, Tom, I think you’ve buried the lede – per your parks ranking list, you’ve never been to Yellowstone? Given your professed adoration for Wilderness (Old Faithful) Lodge, and love of national parks in general, this needs to be corrected!

    I’ve been to over 30 National Parks (including 9 of your top 10, which are all wonderful) and part of me doesn’t want Yellowstone to be my favorite because it sounds like I just picked the most well-known one…but dude, the number of different ways it stands out is just insane. Wildlife. Thermal Features. Waterfalls and Rivers. Canyons. Iconic lodges and classic parkitecture. Mountains. Lakes. History. Sheer size. It’s really incomparable and my #1. (My #2 is Zion, but it’s kind of become a theme park now – during busy seasons you need strategies to avoid massive crowds, and many “attractions” are currently down for maintenance — i.e., classic “people eating” trails are closed due to rockfalls).

    Now that half of this new Cars land is going to be Yellowstone-inspired, I think you’re going to need to book a trip. You know, for WDW research.

    (I’ve got about a million other things to say about this Piston Peak area but I’ll save those for another day.)

    1. Tom, I second this, though you might want to wait a few years until Megatron is a little older. Small children and boardwalks over thermal features just seems anxiety inducing. And when you go to Yellowstone, be sure to go to Gran Tetons too, which I actually like even more. I also highly recommend Bryce and Grand Canyon North Rim, both of which we did with an 11 month old, and are great for a kid that likes to walk some but also ride in a hiking backpack. Shenandoah was also fantastic with an almost 2 year old because it has lots of short trails little kids can do.

      I’m sad about losing the Riverboat, TSI, and Rivers of America. I really hope they find another landing spot for the Riverboat. I think the National Parks can fit in Frontierland, but I’m not sure a road race doesn’t fit in the Narional Parks. A nauseating slow crawl around switchbacks with steep dropoffs and amazing views is much more realistic…

  14. Too bad you didn’t specify the 2 attractions those Imagineers worked on, to give us a little more reassurance.

    1. Tom wrote the following in his other article on this, First Look at Fun Map of Piston Peak Cars Land Replacing Rivers of America in Magic Kingdom: “This is what we’re assuming is a flat ride (given space constraints). The attraction itself is not pictured on the Fun Map (it’s presumably roughly where there’s a circular fence) and it was also blocked out in the model and fly-through we saw. Interesting that they’re being so secretive about that–perhaps they haven’t settled on a ride system yet? (I don’t view this as cause for concern–Imagineering did something similar with the carousel in Tropical Americas; it was unclear whether or not that was Coco-inspired until the D23 Expo.)” Seems the second ride is not known yet.

    2. Miri, we were referencing this: “This includes two attractions that garnered backlash from diehard Walt Disney World fans upon announcement (including us!), but have since become beloved (including with us!).”

      Wondering who the imagineers are/which two attractions they have worked on in the past. Not about the second Cars attraction in the miniland.

    3. Totally guessing with no inside info, I think one is probably Mickey & Minnie’s Runaway Railroad. People were MAD the Great Movie Ride was being replaced but it seems like Runaway Railroad enjoys fairly good standing with most guests. My guess is the other one is Frozen Ever After, again people were not happy about losing Maelstrom but 9 years on Frozen’s still one of the top waits in EPCOT and seems to be on many people’s “must do” lists.

      It’s not quite the same league but he could also be referring to Guardians? I remember a lot of resistance to the idea of more IP and specifically Marvel IP in EPCOT, but even old school EPCOT fans seemed to agree that Ellen’s Energy Adventure was due for a replacement. Now that Guardians is open I don’t think I’ve heard one complaint about the actual ride (the usual complaints about Virtual Queues and Lightning Lanes, but not the actual attraction itself).

  15. Whew, this definitely gives me more peace about the Cars themed area as well. It’s wonderful to hear that much of the inspiration will come from the National Parks. This could end up being a wonderful area. I almost wish the ride was somehow a meandering drive a la Cars when Sally and Lightning drive out to the Wheel Well Motel in the movie instead of a thrilling racing ride. But, I’ll take it if the environment and placemaking is right.

    1. Amanda there is no national park with a car rally race! The beauty of our national parks is nature! Trees, grass fields, lakes and animals roaming throughout. What Disney Corp is doing is a travesty and another destruction of Walt’s dreams. Tom mentions how “Frontierland at Magic Kingdom has always been more of a hodgepodge”. I am not sure about that. Maybe or maybe not. It seems to me changing Splash Mountain, closing the shooting arcade, and now the destruction of Tom Sawyer Island and the river is creating a hodgepodge. Tom also mentions how Paris Disneyland’s – “Thunder Mesa, this is unquestionably my favorite Frontierland in the world.”
      Take a look at Paris Disneyland’s Frontierland and see how it was created WITH the river, steam ship and an artificial island there as well.
      If you ask me the entire WDW Magic Kingdom is becoming a hodgepodge, adding rides with no enticement of a Disney movie attached to it. Beast’s castle. What is that? A restaurant with nothing making you feel as you are in the castle. No feeling of you being surrounded by the movie. Take a look at Tokyo Disneyland’s ride of Beast & Belle. You literally walk into the movie and feel like you are part of it. Take a look at their Frozen land they built with the ride blending into the scene. You again are literally walking through the movie.
      Don’t be fooled by Disney’s sale pitch. They are building another fast dusty hot ride on the death of a beautiful river.

    2. Actually, Joyce, Cars race up Mount Washington in White Mountain National Forest. Look up the Mount Washington Hillclimb.

    3. June I am not positive but I do not believe the “Auto road” that you may be speaking of is in the federal national park portion. As I understand – While nearly the whole mountain is in the White Mountain National Forest, an area of 60.3 acres (24.4 ha) surrounding and including the summit is designated as Mount Washington State Park.
      This may be the area where the “auto road” is located. As I understand all national parks have restrictions. As with the Grand Canyon. The fairly new skywalk over the Grand Canyon is located outside the boundaries of the Grand Canyon National Park portion. This also applies to the helicopter rides over the Grand Canyon. They are not allowed and are not going over the National Park portion.

    4. The Grand Canyon National Park says that there are helicopter tours that go over it, but they take off from and land outside the park. The GCNP also has motorcycle tours through the national park portion.

      All National Parks have restrictions, but they can vary significantly from park to park.

  16. Seemed too good to be true, but it wasn’t. Thrilled that you were right about this, Tom. This is the best possible outcome for a Cars-based retheme of Tom Sawyer’s Island.

  17. Good article, Thanks, Tom.
    I’m “one of those” who are disappointed with the wholesale change in look and feel of the area, and the loss of so many of Walt’s personal touches. “IP is king” for Disney as they claw ever harder to scrape profits and reduce maintenance expenses.
    Enough said…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *