Disney World Extends DAS Window
Effective immediately, Disney has expanded the duration of its Disability Access Service registration window for both Disneyland Resort and Walt Disney World. The latest DAS changes are now in effect on both coasts as of February 2025. This covers details of the extension, plus our commentary about the motivations for making this change and what else might be on the horizon.
As quick background, Disney overhauled DAS at Walt Disney World and Disneyland prior to the start of last summer. According to the company, the changes were due in large part to abuse, misuse, and proliferation of the program’s use–with issuances of DAS tripling from 2019 to last year. For more about the specifics of the overhauled DAS, see Disability Access Service (DAS) Changes at Walt Disney World FAQ.
We’ve been following this saga closely for the last several months, receiving reports from readers and hearing accounts of other guests applying for accommodations at Walt Disney World. It’s a highly sensitive subject that is very personal since it is, quite literally, make or break for some guests trying to experience Walt Disney World. There have been widespread reports of guests who previously had DAS being denied and advised to use alternative accommodations, some of which are new–or are revised and highlighted more prominently.
The make or break nature of the DAS changes and resulting denials are likely what led to the latest DAS policy change by Disney. As of February 1, 2025, both Walt Disney World and Disneyland Resort have extended the DAS registration window to 60 days prior to their park visit. Previously, the process could begin no sooner than 30 days prior to your visit. Here’s the new language:
“Guests can meet virtually with a Cast Member using live video chat to determine what services may be appropriate to support their visit to the theme parks, including DAS. You may have a pre-arrival conversation as soon as 60 days in advance of a park visit.”
The precise verbiage differs from page to page, but that’s the general gist of it. To the best of our knowledge, no language has changed aside from Disney swapping out instances of “30 days” with “60 days.” You probably get the idea without us going page by page to comb through the exact changes. It’s a fairly straightforward doubling of the application window.
The motivation for this change is also likely fairly straightforward: guest satisfaction.
The other recent DAS verbiage change to remove “only” from the eligibility criteria likely involved involvement from an army of attorneys, and even then, its motivations and outcomes are open to interpretation and debate. While we’ll never know for sure what prompted the “only” change or what result it’ll have on the ratio of approvals to denials, our view is that it’s fairly consequential in the quantity of DAS issued despite being only a single word.
With that, my best guess is that Disney wants to soften the perceived limitations in the policy among prospective applicants. To make it appear less harsh or stringent, to encourage guests other than those with developmental disabilities to apply for DAS. It could be a way of unofficially expanding the scope of eligibility without making any substantive changes to the policy or overhauling the program yet again.
By contrast, this is simply about making things easier for guests to plan around DAS and potentially cancel or modify their vacations if they do not receive DAS as an accommodation. Going from 30 to 60 days might result in a negligible increase in DAS applications, but it doesn’t materially change the equation on approvals. It’s all about reducing friction for guests who apply and are denied DAS.
One thing that repeatedly came up in the comments to the “only” change is that 30 days simply is not enough time given Walt Disney World’s vacation package cancellation policies. There and elsewhere, we’ve heard requests for at least 60 days and up to 180 days.
With the extension of DAS applications to 60 days, guests should be able to make an informed decision about their status and cancel if they’re denied and feel visiting Walt Disney World will not be feasible or desirable without the DAS accommodation. Guests who booked vacation packages who apply for DAS sufficiently early will be able to receive full refunds as a matter of policy.
Of course, this doesn’t change anything with the cancellation policies of third parties. Guests who book airfare, off-site hotels, rental cars, and so forth without flexible cancellation or modification policies inside of 60 days will still encounter the same issues. Given this, and the likelihood that vacation planners are largely booking travel more than two months in advance, this won’t be viewed as a perfect solution by some DAS applicants.
However, as we’ve mentioned previously, there’s a push-pull with all of these policy changes. If Disney were to extend the window to 180 days or offer more flexible cancellation policies to DAS applicants, this would create a greater burden on Cast Members and strain the system. It would induce more DAS applications, including those made in bad faith.
This is precisely why I doubt Disney will remove this step of the registration process: “Link valid theme park admission for each member of your party.” While some readers also requested that Disney not require the purchase of admission prior to applying for DAS, I’m skeptical that’ll ever happen. The result would be many more people testing the waters, seeing if they’re eligible for DAS without any actual commitment or intention to visit. I strongly suspect Disney would prefer to process refunds than expand applications in such a manner.
It’s easy for guests to say that an optimal policy is X or Y, because we’re looking at things in the vacuum of that one policy and what’s best for us. Disney has to analyze how all of its policies work in concert, and not introduce loopholes that guests could exploit. Because if there’s anything fans should understand at this point, it’s that even the smallest loophole will be found and abused.
This is why we previously mentioned that we strongly suspected Walt Disney World would issue refunds on accommodations, tickets, and other trip components–even those explicitly being ineligible for refunds–as a guest courtesy to those who had applied for DAS in good faith and been denied. Doing this without having it be the published policy is essential, otherwise it would be abused. Anyone who wanted a refund for anything would simply apply for DAS with the expectation they’d be denied, and then they’d request a refund.
In general, Cast Members have a lot of discretion over cancellations and refunds, even when the official policy says otherwise. Even outside of DAS, you can often receive a refund so long as you have a good reason and don’t have a track record of abusing the system in your guest file.
Suffice to say, the DAS application window being extended from 30 to 60 days is good news.
It appears that Disney is starting to listen. If there were a big dial on DAS policy intensity, Disney cranked it from the minimum to the maximum last year. The likely goal of ping-ponging from one extreme to the other was eradicating abuse, making it clear that the company was serious about DAS and would only grant it in the most extreme scenarios–and scammers need not even bother.
Now that word has gotten out that DAS is a serious policy and not just a rubber-stamp formality, it appears that Disney is taking that big DAS dial and reducing the intensity of the process. Our best guess is that this application extension and the “only” removal are not the only changes in the pipeline, and Walt Disney World is searching to find more of a middle ground. At least, that’s our hope. It doesn’t seem coincidental to have two changes in the span of a week after absolutely nothing for over 8 months.
As we’ve discussed previously, Disney needs to find this middle ground. Making measured and careful changes, and assessing the impact before further adjustments is the savvy approach.
On the one hand, there have been heartbreaking stories of DAS denials, many of which have gone viral for good reason. These have made it really seem like a more flexible and humane approach offering greater discretion to Cast Members is necessary. All of this strongly suggested that Disney went too far with the DAS overhaul, and needed some degree of relaxing its policies.
On the other hand, Disney needs to avoid relaxing its rules too much, or else risk a return to the rampant abuse that was fostered by hugely popular TikToks and influential social media groups. This has been exacerbated by a sense of entitlement, lack of shame, and Disney creating an incentive for DAS scammers by monetizing line-skipping via Lightning Lanes.
It’s a really difficult for Disney to balance this, but it needs to happen. The pendulum swung from one extreme to another, and there has been a lot of collateral damage among disabled guests who needed DAS and have been denied under the overly-stringent system. Cranking the DAS dial to its maximum setting hasn’t just eradicated the scammers, it has hurt guests who are actually disabled.
With that said, it’s fair to point out that there has been a positive impact on the guest experience for everyone: better-flowing lines and lower wait times. We discussed this at length in Here’s Why Standby Lines and Lightning Lanes Are Moving Faster at Walt Disney World.
The bottom line is that the DAS changes and, to a lesser extent, switch from Genie+ to Lightning Lane Multi-Pass are having a significant impact. It should go without saying that there are controversies, downsides, and unfortunate realities to the above. But the improvement to the flow of lines–standby and Lightning Lanes–as well as lower wait times is also undeniable.
In my view, this has been achieved very well–to the extent that there’s now excess ‘bandwidth’ in the system before it starts negatively impacting the standby line or Lightning Lanes (again). That’s one reason why Premier Pass hasn’t been a concern to us, and also why we think Walt Disney World can go a bit further in reducing the intensity on that proverbial DAS dial.
Assuming that capacity or bandwidth exists in the Lightning Lanes, it’ll be interesting to see what other policy changes Walt Disney World makes to DAS. As mentioned above, a big reader request was a longer application window–that’s now been granted. So what other tweaks would be meaningful to you without unduly disturbing the balance of things?
From the outside looking in, the big change we’d like to see is a “recalibration” of the interview process. We’ve heard from countless readers who have been denied, and there’s a word that has been used repeatedly to describe the process: interrogation. While we can appreciate how stressful this process is for Cast Members and the verbal abuse they take for disgruntled guests, there’s a better way of handling the process that feels less adversarial.
This wouldn’t be an actual public-facing policy change, as it would be almost impossible for the company to convey. Disney probably isn’t going to write in its FAQ that “the interview is now an interview, instead of a scene from Star Wars: Rise of the Resistance like it was the last ~8 months.” Somehow I don’t see the Disney Legal team approving that verbiage. Disney has an exemplary reputation for guest service and accommodations. It would be a shame to lose that as even more collateral damage to the DAS overhaul.
Planning a Walt Disney World trip? Learn about hotels on our Walt Disney World Hotels Reviews page. For where to eat, read our Walt Disney World Restaurant Reviews. To save money on tickets or determine which type to buy, read our Tips for Saving Money on Walt Disney World Tickets post. Our What to Pack for Disney Trips post takes a unique look at clever items to take. For what to do and when to do it, our Walt Disney World Ride Guides will help. For comprehensive advice, the best place to start is our Walt Disney World Trip Planning Guide for everything you need to know!
YOUR THOUGHTS
Thoughts on the latest change to DAS policies at Walt Disney World and Disneyland? Think this is about improving guest satisfaction, making DAS work better with cancellation policies, and reducing friction for DAS denials? Think that Disney is adjusting the DAS dial, reducing the intensity setting? Hopeful that further changes will be made that result in increased approvals for those who truly need DAS while keeping abuse low? Agree or disagree with our assessment of the changes or policy as a whole? Please try to stay on topic–we’ve noticed some of these DAS comments sections get heated and personal. Discuss the policy itself, not others’ use (or lack thereof) of it.
I had an idea the other day – for parties of more than 4, allow extras to buy a lightning lane type package to be added to the DAS, probably with a limit. So if your party is (say), 6, 4 are added to the DAS and two buy a package that’s the same price as LLMP which allows them to be added to the DAS selections. This keeps families together but prevents people trying to get out of paying for LLMP.
I like the idea of keeping the changes low-key. People have a LOT of opinions about health and the state of our bodies. Best to make these adjustments in a way that helps without attracting unneeded extra commentary.
I have a 24 year old daughter with Autism,Seizure disorder, CRPS and PTSD. We have gone to WDW many times. We have always been able to use the DAS pass. We have not gone yet since the overhaul so I cannot speak if she would or wouldn’t be approved. However, I think the interview process is great and I can see why it was needed to be overhauled. I do feel that WDW has the right to ask for a drs note stating reasons why the DAS is warranted. I feel that any parent or persons requesting such a pass would have no problem attaining such to give to WDW to “Prove ” the need. Maybe this is the way to stop the fakers from ruining it for the people needing it. However, then HIPPA would stepin and become an issue. I feel that the HIPPA could somehow be ok if the person allowing their information shared approved it. I can see both Disney’s issue as well as patrons of Disney.
My goodness do I wish we could furnish doctor’s note, doctor’s letter, IEP, etc.! We did this with IBCESS at Universal and were granted the accommodation.
Sure, the system was in need of an overhaul, as we all have seen how offensive it was that people cheated the system. People called it a “hack” where it is blatantly cheating, let’s be honest. But to see the pendulum swing so painfully to the other direction for those who were able to enjoy Disney as one of their safe, happy places without feeling less than was not the thing to do. My son, who has Autism, wants to spend the day with his family, as they want to spend the day with him. For most, this can not happen with the new “accommodations” they are offering to most. Of course, it is fair for us to wait to enter the queue after 60 minutes if that is the wait time, as everyone else would do stand in the line, but it is not right to split our family so we have to meet them line at some point. Everyone else gets to have the experience of waiting with their family. Don’t even get me started on the chaos of trying to meet up with them in line, as anyone who knows anything about Autism can see a potential issue with such chaos, but with our yearly travel party being 6 people, we are going to need to give it a try, meltdowns be damned! Please let things land in the middle, with the system being too difficult to “hack” for people who do not need the service, but without the humiliating aspect of sharing protected health information to cast members who are often ill-informed of options that DAS cast members provide on the calls. The misinformation and/or ill-information is no fault of front line staff- there should be procedures to adhere to, or at a minimum, a quality assurance component. Speaking of quality assurance….Disney, please monitor the DAS calls and in particular, the lack of compassion that some of the Inspire contracted employees display. Your years of boasting the Four Keys to a Great Guest Experience are going down the toilet. Even though Inspire staff are not Disney, they are a reflection of you since you hired/contracted with them. Lack of empathy is an understatement for a majority of who my fellow Autism parents spoke with. Unfortunately the same can be said for the DAS Disney cast members/gate keepers as well. In a time where equity is a political talking point, be the better company like you always have been, as a champion for inclusion.
I’ve noticed the abuse coming back at WDW. I was at Magic Kingdom two weeks ago and after the fireworks and crowds thinned, two people- a man and woman – in their early 20s were playing chicken and chasing each other up and down Main Street on scooters. We had to jump out of their way twice. The way their were kicking their legs out at each other as they passed each other and playing around, they did NOT need the scooters. I’ve also heard people boasting about manipulating the DAS system in restaurants and in food lines, yet have seen older people- who clearly need it- waddling through queues. The system obviously needs more work.
Anyone can rent a scooter right out front of the entrance or from a 3rd party company. This is in no way related to the DAS system at all.
Anybody can rent a wheelchair. The front-of-the-line access they used to receive ended years ago. Most people using an ECV these days really need it or they are lazy, because there is no advantage anymore. In the past, they would allow a wheelchair on a bus and their entire entourage was able to get on with them…Disney has limited it to 6 people. There really is not much wheelchair abuse anymore.
Bryan & Bea- those are good points. I always thought the scooters and wheelchairs they rented were for those who could prove disability. I didn’t know anyone could rent them but that makes sense now. I feel bad for those who may need them but can’t rent them because those who don’t got to them first. Bea, I don’t really see people abusing the wheelchairs at the parks. They seem to roll through the queues with everyone or are pushed through a back entrance by cast members. The problem is there are people who know how to manipulate the system. Sadly, it affects those who honestly need it. My mother-in-law used a scooter when we visited a few years ago before she passed away. I was happy that Disney was able to help walk her through the DAS process. They were very kind and accommodating. Of course, due to her condition, she was only able to ride two attractions while we were there so she didn’t affect wait times by much, lol. She did enjoy all of the shows though. 🙂
I personally feel like the DAS overusage is slowly coming back at least in Disneyland. Yesterday when I was at Disneyland while I was waiting for Casey Jr, the posted wait was 15 minutes with only 2 small switchbacks being used. With only one train running, it seemed pretty accurate based on how many people were in the queue. 3 minutes later, about 4 people entered the accessibility ramp to the ride followed by an additional 8 people. The CM cleared the ramp and the standby moved a little. After waiting 6 minutes for the train to come back, I saw more people get in the ramp. I t did not bother me too much to see people use the ramp as they likely had their qualifications approved by the CM; but a group of two women were smiling and taking to each other by how they skipped the line instantaneously using DAS. I was shocked to hear them blatantly admitting to cheating the system, but I did not want to worry about it as I didn’t want to fixate on it. By the time I got to the ride, my actual wait time turned into a 30 minute wait all because the people with special needs kept on stopping the standby line and they just kept on coming non-stop. I hope we are not returning to the rampant overuse of DAS last year as these past few months have actually been pretty good for the flow of standby. Apologies for the rant and sorry if I offended anybody.
Yeah, you imply that Disney is listening to people that have concerns. The only people they are listening to is their legal team, as they are tiptoeing a massive suit against them. Disney did not change their verbage to help accommodate people with disabilities, only to avoid legal trouble. Their system is now designed to shut down the das, except for people with autism, but even people with autism are being denied. If you look deeper into why Disney has chosen people with Autism, it’s because of a previous court case where a judge required it. That gave Disney the official legal standpoint to deny everyone else. Shutting down the das gives them opportunity to make more money, and to satisfy the people without a disability.
I am also a little confused on why you said this works out better for everyone? The parks are now almost impossible for people with debilitating disabilities. The disability section of the parking lots have many openings now. That is sad. You have to remember, some people with disabilities ONLY HAD Disney. They didn’t get another choice because very few businesses accommodate people with disabilities so they didn’t completely feel like they were disabled or a burden. It was the one place where we weren’t constantly reminded that we were less than. Constantly reminded that we were not human. Constantly reminded that we couldn’t just live. If you are disabled, you know exactly what I’m talking about. This was the one single place that we were a little more ok.
But now all that is gone…. Once again, I constantly feel disabled.
I think people became so accustomed to Disney just giving everybody everything they wanted all the time, that all of these changes become huge disappointments. Disney is not saying anybody is inhuman. They have to find the balance between supporting those who need it and removing the privilege from those who take advantage. The 60 day window allows people to cancel in the event that they are denied DAS, without any penalty. Of course Disney is consulting with their legal team. I know people who are affected by this change and it is unfortunate. Having said that, the only thing Disney is required to do is follow ADA laws. You know just like you get at the grocery store, movie theater, local parks etc? if they are compliant then they are doing what is required of them and everything else is gravy. I’m not demeaning anybody with a disability. I live with one myself. Mine doesn’t qualify. So I get to make the choice whether or not I want to spend my money at Disney or elsewhere
The comment by John is exactly the sentiment that I am speaking of…tell that to a child with Autism. You are right, there is absolutely zero accommodation in the world for my child and we live in it and manage the best we can because we have no choice. Disney was the one place that was magical and special and selfish people ruined that little bubble, with my child as collateral damage. No one says they have to accommodate. But they did. And not only did they take it away, but are making people feel less than human when conducting screening. There is no excuse for that and that is not expected in a world that I want to live in.
Disney created this….now they have to figure out what to do! If they focus on those who say they have a need, where does that leave everybody else? And what I mean is, so many claim to have a need. We live a country focused on entitlement. Started getting really bad back in 2006/8 and has escalated so much since. I deserve “that”, because of “this”. People have been given an inch and now they expect a mile. Truthfully. We have many who have a genuine need and also we live in a country where so many self-diagnose. I see it all the time. People who self-diagnose with ADHD, ASD, OCD, compulsive behavior, severe anxiety, etc. How does Disney balance this out without people making it personal or stating they are a victim of the system? They either offer a free pass to all who say they need it or they try to regulate it and people get upset. I just don’t see them coming up with a system that makes everybody happy.
Prior to today’s expectations, people had choices to make and nobody received any extras. I remember how hard it was to take my cousin with CP anywhere, because we had to wait like everybody else. He moved around nonstop, he was loud, he either hit things with his palm or head when he was not stimulated. We went to Sesame Place back in the day and we could not even go half a day. Same things with Six Flags….and Disneyland. The zoo was a little easier, but still the same thing.
Thanks Tom for all your hard work updating us on all things Disney. While I do realize the world we live in has a lot of things going on that never make sense, I’m still shaking my head that people go to such extremes to pretend to be disabled to abuse the system. They still have to stand in line. With our 37 yr old special needs daughter who gets DAS we still have to purchase the lightening lanes. She can only tolerate a few hours in the parks and DAS gives you one ride that can be replenished 10 min after you swipe in. Now who’s going to be to look for a new ride while you’re on one? We used to be able to plan 3 rides in a specific area of a park as she cannot just tolerate going all over a park in a day . I guess the thing I’m getting at is how the heck people want to pretend to be disabled. Spend a day with us and see how disgraceful it pretend. But then again these people have no conscience .
We just arrived home from Disney Friday. My son has always qualified for the DAS but like 99% of disabled people he was denied, which led us to purchase the Premiere Pass for three days so that my son was able to go on rides without waiting and getting ill. It cost us a fortune, but it was the only safe way to go and enjoy parks. So is Disney now back peddling? Will we be able to get a credit for being forced to buy those expensive passes we really couldn’t afford? We spent and extra $3,000 for those tickets, what a shame on Disney!
Since being diagnosed with osteoarthritis in my feet, hips, knees, and hands, I have requested the DAS pass. Each tine, it was granted, and the Cast Member was very understanding. They often suggested a scooter, but then I told them my doctor’s advice which is to keep standing and moving, not sitting. In fact, sitting for any length of time makes standing up and moving even more painful. Cast Members granted me and my part of 2 adults (one with celiac & IBS) the DAS, and they seemed to recognize that we were not scamming and abusing. As a retired Disney Cast Member, I understand the need to prevent the abuse of the system; however, surely Disney can offer the DAS to folks who have used it in the past, based on their particular needs. The current limitation has been injurious to many elderly, chronically ill, and genuinely needy folks. I hope the parameters are widened, and Disney keeps track of those who seem to be abusing it.
You are the only person that I have heard of getting the DAS, My husband has MS, I have Severe OAR and my son has Epilepsy and seizure disorders and we were denied. Disney needs to fix this. But good for you for getting the DAS pass!