Disney World Reveals New GEO-82 Adults-Only Lounge Coming to EPCOT!

Walt Disney World has two new lounges coming to Magic Kingdom and EPCOT in 2025, with the latter being a bar called GEO-82 inside Spaceship Earth. This shares dates & details, concept art, access & age restrictions, and everything we know–plus comprehensive commentary about more bars at WDW and whether we think these are potentially good or bad additions for the park.

Prior to revealing the new GEO-82 name, Walt Disney World previously announced that the lounge inside Spaceship Earth will pay tribute to the most beautiful EPCOT icon. Everyone’s favorite geodesic sphere will be home to a whole new experience when GEO-82 opens in late Spring 2025, welcoming an elevated lounge to the list of things that make it absolutely stunning! This elegant lounge, honoring the intertwined history of Spaceship Earth and EPCOT itself, is set to celebrate the legacy of the icon’s past while admiring its future.

Walt Disney World chefs have created delicious culinary creations to complement the elegance of this extraordinary, intimate setting. While taking in breathtaking views of the park from an entirely new angle, you can be inspired by the stories and legacy of this iconic structure. With sweeping views of World Celebration Gardens and a unique perspective of the nightly fireworks, this secluded retreat invites you to raise a toast to the enduring spirit of EPCOT.

The latest news from Walt Disney World is that when GEO-82 opens this year (no mention of the previous “late Spring 2025” timeline), the location will offer reservations for guests 21 and older. The GEO-82 lounge inside Spaceship Earth will be the ultimate spot to toast to a trip around EPCOT with innovative cocktails and globally influenced small plates while you take in spectacular park views.

With this new GEO-82 lounge, you’ll feel like you’re discovering an all-new part of Spaceship Earth. GEO-82 will surround guests with iconic shapes and intricate structures inspired by the park’s instantly-recognizable icon. You’ll sit amid rich textures and warm, metallic tones that echo Spaceship Earth in an elegant and intimate setting.

The name GEO-82 is a nostalgic nod to Spaceship Earth—which opened in 1982 and is a GEOdesic sphere. At GEO-82, you’ll be immersed in the storied history and enduring legacy of this timeless EPCOT icon. According to Walt Disney World, advance reservations are required at GEO-82, as space is extremely limited. Check back later this spring to learn more about reservations and the menu at GEO-82.

Obviously, the big news here is that GEO-82 is an adults-only lounge, which is a first for any of the Walt Disney World theme parks. Even the Club 33 lounges allow guests of all ages. While there are a couple of restaurants that ‘gently discourage’ families with small children (Takumi-Tei and Monsieur Paul), even those don’t require guests be age 21 or older. So this is pretty notable!

It’s also bound to be controversial. Not just because everything Walt Disney World does is mired in controversy if you look for it hard enough. But because EPCOT being too alcohol-centric is already a common complaint among fans, and frankly, one that has some degree of validity. This will only add fuel to that fire.

There was a time when we avoided EPCOT on weekends. This is even still mentioned in some of our resources, especially when it comes to fall dates when Food & Wine Festival is happening and universities in Florida have away football games. After recently riding Cosmic Rewind over a dozen times during college spring break, I was reminded of this once again. (More on that soon…)

However, I very much disagree with the sentiment that this is worsening. That is, specifically, a complaint we regularly hear–that EPCOT is (in a state of) becoming more focused on alcohol and drinking culture. While overconsumption absolutely still happens–there’s no denying that–our view is that it peaked around ~2015 to 2017.

I still remember one infamous weekend during Food & Wine when we saw college students passed out in the lawn and other unsavory activities. While you’ll still spot bachelor/bachelorette parties, team drinking shirts, etc., it’s far less common than it once was. I assume younger people being priced out of APs and the rising cost of alcohol–as opposed to proactive policies on the part of Walt Disney World–have been the driving factor.

GEO-82 is unlikely to move the needle on overconsumption one way or the other. I’d liken this to table service restaurants serving alcohol at Magic Kingdom, which has similarly been a non-factor.

As a practical reality, GEO-82 is going to be an incredibly competitive Advance Dining Reservation. Easily one of the top 5 most difficult ADRs at Walt Disney World, potentially surpassing the Space 220 Lounge. It’s highly unlikely that adults are going to get up at the crack of dawn 60+ days in advance, fist-pump upon scoring an ADR, and shout their enthusiasm: “now I have somewhere to get blackout drunk at EPCOT!”

Call me naive, but I don’t think the hardcore day-drinking crew has that degree of dedication or level of premeditation. More likely, the target demo of this lounge is going to be dorks (non-derogatory) looking for old school EPCOT Center easter eggs, diehards wanting to drink or dine inside the geodesic sphere, and other Childless Disney Millennials. I would hazard a guess that on any given visit to GEO-82, you’re going to see far more Loungefly bags, Spirit Jerseys, and Figment paraphernalia than visibly drunk guests.

Anyone who wants to get wasted at EPCOT will be doing that at the countless walk-up bars and kiosks throughout the parks. There’s no shortage of opportunities for that all around World Showcase (and beyond), and it’s hard to imagine GEO-82 changes the equation on that. A new lounge, even one that’s 21 and up, with a significant barrier to entry will not increase alcohol overconsumption in EPCOT by any meaningful amount.

To be clear, none of this is to say that EPCOT doesn’t still have a problem with drinking culture. I’m far from a prude (or so I’d like to think), and I think Disney could be more diligent about reducing consumption. There’s no incentive to do so and it would be a nightmare for frontline Cast Members to enforce, but they should figure out something.

Regardless, the trajectory is for this to get better as opposed to worse–and GEO-82 won’t alter that one way or the other. I assume visible overconsumption will continue to decrease as prices continue going up and the demographics most inclined to overdrink are least likely to be able to afford admission and alcohol. Basically, it’ll continue self-correcting.

GEO-82 will also be controversial from another perspective, which is this common complaint: “Walt Disney World only builds bars! They need to focus on more family-friendly stuff!”

That’s no longer a fair criticism, and hasn’t been for a while. Sure, when Trader Sam’s Grog Grotto, Jock Lindsey’s Hangar Bar, The Edison, and a handful of other locations that were very clearly aimed at adults–and only adults–it was true. Especially during the peak years of the Downtown Disney reimagining into Disney Springs. There was also validity to the grousing when more bar kiosks were popping up or a greater emphasis was placed on alcohol on restaurant menus.

That hasn’t been the trend of the last several years, though. Instead, Walt Disney World has added a slew of family-friendly lounges that are more food-forward. These are more fairly categorized as restaurants than bars (or at least “and grills”), and are oozing inviting atmosphere and have robust food menus that arguably surpass some of the regular restaurants at their respective resorts. This is true with the new Wailulu Bar & Grill at the Poly’s Island Tower, and will likely be the case with the Pirates Tavern at Magic Kingdom.

There are also countless other examples of Walt Disney World building attractions and experiences for all ages. Still, GEO-82 with its adults-only rule will be one glaring instance of Walt Disney World opening something aimed only at adults, and it’s sure to draw scrutiny from those who believe Walt Disney only wanted things where parents and children could spend time together. Not really any way around that one.

As a retired Childless Disney Millennial and current Disney Dad, I have some thoughts about GEO-82 being adults-only.

Having been a member of both groups, the former for over a decade and the latter for the last couple of years, I’d like to think that I have unique perspective. First and foremost, I’m a little bummed out that we won’t be able to take Megatron here. From a purely selfish perspective–and let’s be honest, that’s the most important one to each of us–that kinda stinks!

Being more objective, this is great for Childless Disney Millennials and other generations of Disney Adults. My general perspective is–and always has been–that kids should be welcome just about everywhere in society. For instance, grown adults who get upset about crying babies on airplanes are the real crybabies in that example.

At the same time, it is nice for adults to have spaces to themselves. These should be discretionary places that aren’t essential to any core experience, and have a reason–sophistication, atmosphere, etc–for being adults-only. This is true at Walt Disney World and beyond.

This is probably going to make me unpopular with my fellow parents, but there are several existing spaces at Walt Disney World that would benefit from being more restrictive. There’s no reason I need to take my daughter to Citricos, Toledo, or a handful of bars and a few select Signature Restaurants. Having some upscale options for families is a good thing, but parents with small children don’t need all of them.

Allowing kids to sophisticated restaurants introduces too much of a wildcard. We’ve had a few expensive date nights at refined restaurants where, only a table or two away, were kids bouncing off the walls…or subdued by an iPad without headphones. We didn’t get upset–after all, that’s the nature of the beast at Walt Disney World. But we did wonder what they were doing there, and vowed to learn from that experience and never do the same with our kids before they were ready for refined restaurants. (To make me even more unpopular, I’d also advocate for more stringent enforcement of existing dress codes for similar reasons.)

In a perfect world, parents would be able to use their discretion, determining whether their kids are mature enough for Signature Restaurants and other more sophisticated spaces at Walt Disney World. But we don’t live in a perfect world. Many people don’t make judgment calls with self-awareness; they do so with selfishness.

Our view is that Walt Disney World needs to do more to cater to families with small children, as it risks losing its foundational generational fans if it doesn’t reach kids during their formative years. But this mostly revolves around promotions and pricing, not the substance of the experiences. In that regard, Walt Disney World is undeniably a family-friendly place, first and foremost.

At the same time, there’s no denying overarching demographic trends. It’s savvy for Disney to add adult-centric attractions & entertainment, and otherwise chase the convention-goer and childless millennial demographics. Adults without children are making up an ever-increasing slice of the pie for Walt Disney World, and they’re freer spending.

Given all of that, and since some of these spaces are enhanced by being adults-only and because parents cannot be counted on to use their discretion to determine whether their kids are sufficiently mature for a sophisticated setting, age restrictions can make sense. The question is nevertheless whether it makes sense here, at GEO-82.

GEO-82 is obviously a discretionary space. It previously existed as a corporate sponsor lounge, so it hasn’t been accessible to 99.99% of EPCOT theme park guests for the last few decades, anyway.

No family’s trip will be “ruined” by being denied entry into GEO-82. Most probably won’t know about it and will go about their day as always. If anything, they’ll instead visit dining options that are more family-friendly and better suited to kids. I am 100% certain that our Megatron will enjoy Space 220, Coral Reef, Biergarten, Garden Grill, and several other EPCOT eateries more than GEO-82.

That still leaves the unanswered question of whether there’s good reason for GEO-82 being an adults-only lounge. Will it be sophisticated? Have a more adult atmosphere? Be a quiet place to decompress away from the hustle and bustle of the park?

Frankly, I’m skeptical about any of this. The decor looks fairly basic (a style masquerading as classy and elegant, but not so much in terms of fit and finishings), and the presence of all those Loungefly bags and Figment things suggests it’s probably not going to be all that refined, in actuality.

I really hope I’m wrong about that, and that Imagineering gets the budget necessary to make this something special, and that the culinary teams have a chance to show off their creativity in making ambitious and adult menus. This is a space that could be relatively simple, but emerge as a Walt Disney World dining heavyweight by nailing all of the little things. Kinda like Takumi-Tei, but with a great view.

If that happens, we will still come out ahead as Disney Parents, because we will win when Walt Disney World executes projects on a high level. On a more selfish level, there will be a compelling “excuse” to bring along the grandparents and have GEO-82 be the first stop in a multi-phase date night at EPCOT, followed by a fancy dinner in Japan or France. (We’ll probably never actually do this, if I’m being honest with myself, but I can dare to dream!)

Regardless of the adults-only age restriction, my prediction is still that Advance Dining Reservations for the Spaceship Earth lounge instantly become the #1 most difficult ADR in all of Walt Disney World, dethroning the Space 220 Lounge in the process. Even though this should have slightly higher capacity and less in the way of themed design, the view and novelty of being inside Spaceship Earth will be like catnip to childless Disney Adults–and there are a lot of them!

This is actually yet another reason to make GEO-82 adults-only. Demand will be sky-high regardless, and kids cannot consume alcohol (legally), so they’re utilizing capacity in a space not aimed at them. This dynamic reminds me a little of when the Frozen meet & greet just debuted and was super popular, and parents were (rightfully!) annoyed by a bunch of childless bloggers clogging up the lines.

Ultimately, it’ll be interesting to see how things continue to unfold with GEO-82. Here I was thinking that the lounge inside Spaceship Earth would be fairly uninteresting, with fans uniting behind the notion of something that was once exclusive being opened up to the park-going public. Walt Disney World essentially said, “hold my beer” in response to that thought, and this is probably going to be pretty polarizing as a result.

Planning a Walt Disney World trip? Learn about hotels on our Walt Disney World Hotels Reviews page. For where to eat, read our Walt Disney World Restaurant Reviews. To save money on tickets or determine which type to buy, read our Tips for Saving Money on Walt Disney World Tickets post. Our What to Pack for Disney Trips post takes a unique look at clever items to take. For what to do and when to do it, our Walt Disney World Ride Guides will help. For comprehensive advice, the best place to start is our Walt Disney World Trip Planning Guide for everything you need to know!

YOUR THOUGHTS

Thoughts on GEO-82 being an adults-only bar? Are you excited for the Spaceship Earth lounge at EPCOT? Or are you disappointed that Disney is adding more bars and lounges to the parks? Do you agree or disagree with our assessments? Any questions we can help you answer? Hearing your feedback–even when you disagree with us–is both interesting to us and helpful to other readers, so please share your thoughts below in the comments!

You might also like...

57 Comments

    1. Nicolas:
      meh

      Overview
      Usage examples
      Similar and opposite words
      indifference or mild disappointment
      interjection. ˈme. used to express indifference or mild disappointment. meh.
      https://www.merriam-webster.com
      MEH Definition & Meaning – Merriam-Webster

  1. “ Many people don’t make judgment calls with self-awareness; they do so with selfishness.”. I’ve been reading your pieces for a long time now and this has to be the best line you have ever written.

    1. Thanks! I was really patting myself on the back with the crying babies/crybabies line. That’s the better of the two lines, IMO.

    2. It really is one of Tom’s best! Maybe not THE best since it’s not about Muppets or Country Bears, but close.

  2. As a Millennial Disney Dad I’m excited to check this out on our trip in June. Grandma has agreed to watch the kids for one night so my wife and I very much hope to try this. It makes sense for Disney to do this, as its the adults who have the money to spend after all and having a kid free space is perfectly fine.

  3. This is such great news, very excited for an adults only space! I still miss the days when Pleasure Island was 18+, at least we had that.

  4. I don’t really have a problem with adults only spaces, but i think the issue here is this sounds like a very unique space that those of us with children (and our children) won’t get to check out at all. It seems like they could have been creative and had an adults only lounge within another restaurant. But perhaps this is a small space, in which case they will have no issue filling adrs with adults. And Epcot really is a park that could use more additions for families (I know many with young kids that skip it), so while I don’t think it will add to the drinking problem, it will add to the vibe that Epcot is an adult centered park that caters more towards drinking.

  5. I think we’ve all sat by well-behaved toddlers, and not so well-behaved toddlers. Same goes for the behavior of adults. Give me a well-behaved toddler over an obnoxiously loud adult any day of the week. But what I would really love for Disney to address is the volume of noise across all their ADR restaurants. And sure, maybe making some spots 21+ may address certain noise issues. But maybe add tablecloths and other noise dampening tactics? Perhaps I’m just getting older, but so many of the restaurants I’ve been to at Disneyworld recently have just had a more cafeteria-like atmosphere, even though they are beautifully themed. It just feels like another cost-cutting measure, at the expense of guest satisfaction, to not provide some more noise control measures.

  6. Defending exclusion of children on ambiance / sophistication grounds always strikes me as a bit pretextual. You’re of course right that people are often selfish, but this extends to everyone visiting a space, not just parents.

    I’ve never found a convincing argument to ban an entire class of people from a space on the grounds that some (most, even) of them aren’t sophisticated enough, and I think it’s accepted when it comes to kids because culturally it’s just okay to “other” kids in this way. (And hey, you know what kind of people also tend to be unsophisticated? People who have been drinking alcohol!) My cynic is showing, but when it comes down to it, some people just think it’s icky to be around kids, and bans like this reinforce the idea that it’s okay to feel that way.

    “In a perfect world, parents would be able to use their discretion, determining whether their kids are mature enough for Signature Restaurants and other more sophisticated spaces at Walt Disney World. But we don’t live in a perfect world.”

    This is true, but we still have a choice as to *which imperfect world we want to build.* The general way we handle disturbances to an ambiance is simply by asking individuals or groups to be quiet or to leave. Of course no one wants conflict with these individuals. Having to deal with that is imperfect. But maybe that’s the imperfection we should accept rather than the imperfection of just banning all people of a certain age.

    1. You’re right when it comes to society as a whole, but I don’t think the cynical perspective is the correct one when it comes to anything with “Disney” in the name. If people felt it was icky to be around kids, they probably wouldn’t be at Walt Disney World in the first place.

      As a practical matter, it’s simply a lot easier to have age restrictions than any other sort of mechanism. Part of that is because, as you point out, there’s societal precedent for it. Cast Members already have an unenviable task in enforcing rules with guests “who paid a lot of money for this vacation.” Good luck trying to accomplish that on a case-by-case basis at Signature Restaurants or other upscale places.

    2. The issue is that most people these days have no common sense on good days, and worse when on vacation where the general thought is that their kids should be able to do whatever they want because they’ve paid out $$$$$ for a perfect vacation, all others be damned. Sorry, but it’s apparent we cannot expect even a majority of guests to exhibit class or judgement on these trips. I’ve seen physical fights in the parks, something unimaginable ten years ago. While this could still happen in an adults-only bar area, I see it as less likely.

    3. “I’ve seen physical fights in the parks, something unimaginable ten years ago. While this could still happen in an adults-only bar area, I see it as less likely.”

      Wait a second…are you suggesting that toddlers are more likely to get into fist fights? 😉

      I dunno, but I think the physical altercations we’ve seen in the parks are more likely to be caused by alcohol than by children.

    4. Haha, of course they do! There just tends to be less carnage… I think some altercations involve adults getting mad when other adults admonish their misbehaving children or more frequently the adults doing things like cutting in lines, etc. Possibly while inebriated. As you’ve noted many times, people just can’t behave in public any longer and it’s been far worse since the covid mania. I think one ‘adult’ space at Epcot is not going to be good or bad wrt behaviors, etc. I am looking forward to it!

  7. So, it’s an interesting take, but here is what I want to see more of at the upscale restaurants… 10+/21+. I wanna see Space 220 or some of the other high end restaurants limit the dinner portion of the service to like minded/calmer people who can enjoy a meal without flinging food or crying. I don’t want seated next to crying children, because I waited til my own child was capable of sitting through meals before taking her into nice places. Does this not fit a good chunk of the Disney demographic? Yeah, but to be fair, I’m over the toddler crowd. I rearranged my life to be a AP carrying Disney adult within 15 minutes of WDW property line. I’m not the norm, but I am a growing crowd of child-free/older child Disney spenders with a large budget to pour into the revenue stream.

    1. As mentioned in the post, I also think this.

      However, I think Space 220 is a bad example of a restaurant that should be like this. It’s firmly aimed at families, and should stay that way IMO.

      For the most part, restaurants that could justifiably have age restrictions (and more stringent dress codes, while we’re at it) are almost exclusively at the Deluxe Resorts and Disney Springs.

    2. Sometimes folks need to do calls or whip out the laptop and do some…work…while on vacation and having an adults area with a great view and less noise would be awesome. Like, say Geyser Point at Wilderness Lodge out by the water…at least part of it could be kid-free. There are other similar spaces…

    3. I can’t wait for a 21+ space. I disagree that Space 220 bar is child appropriate for bar stools or any bar stools for that matter. My son is an adult and my husband and I go to the parks to play. We couldn’t be more excited for a child free space!

  8. I’m just glad that this lounge is open to the public and not a DVC/AP perk. I also agree that it is nice to see a few more strictly adults only places being added. I understand that much (most) of Walt Disney World is and should be aimed at all guests, regardless of age, but it is nice that just a few things are catering exclusively to adults. I’m sure Geo82 is able to take this “bold” stance at excluding children because Disney knows that they will have incredible amounts of demand for this no matter what, but this one wrinkle will help reduce the number of guests clamoring to get just a little bit more.

  9. My partner and I are squarely in that childless millennial demographic (childfree, even), and I’m pleasantly surprised–thrilled, even. I would never have thought we’d see an adult only space anywhere in the parks. I can’t wait to check it out.

  10. Love it! Great idea on both the EPCOT and Magic Kingdom locations. Tom, always love and agree on your comments around decor. Disney, of all brands and companies, should push the limit on this front. Look forward to visiting both bars when open.

  11. To be quite honest, there hasn’t been a good place for the 21+ crowd to just have their own space ever since Pleasure Island closed. I’m not one for bars (I wasn’t even all that fond of Oga’s due to the space and my mom’s in a wheelchair), but I’m looking forward to trying to get into this new lounge – just to check it out. I hope Disney keeps making 21+ places, even if it’s just for us childless Disney people to decompress.

  12. I agree with you, Tom. No park visitor with children is going to have their vacation ruined because they can’t take their kids into one (or several) places in the parks. I would also add that there are plenty of places that are “exclusively” for kids in the parks, so why can’t there be places that are adult-exclusive? I put the quotation marks in the exclusively for kids, because you can probably call such places family-friendly and for everyone. However, as an adult without children, I am not going to be spending time at playgrounds (of which there are many at WDW), splash zones, or the Disney Jr Dance Party at Hollywood Studios. There is also nothing that interests me in the circus-themed area at MK, etc. The kid-centric areas certainly have their place in WDW, and I think adult-centric places do as well.

    1. Agree 100% here. I understand Walt’s vision and realize the need for children’s areas as it’s the ‘start’ of your Disney journey. But, as someone who never wanted kids and has a (blessed) expendable income that normally goes to Disney each year (we are DVC owners), this is fantastic. Additionally, I cannot ride things like GoG/Mission Space due to a health issue, and this makes a perfect place for me to hang out while the family hits those up. I’m definitely going to be one of those dorks who now moves THIS to the top of ADRs in a couple months.

  13. As a newly-minted empty nester, I think this is great! We love Disney with the kids, but it will also be nice to have a spot with no reminders of kids (or our lack thereof) on our kid-free trip that we’ve got planned. Don’t get me wrong, I’m still going to look forward to bringing my teen and young adult children to Disney (we are all seasoned fans), but when we can get away just the two of us this might be a really nice treat!

  14. I think this is a cool addition, personally. Nice for a date night or locals that are adults that go often and want something different. Hopefully they will have cool alcohol free drinks as well as I really don’t drink much. I totally agree that some of the signature dining should be adults only (probably only for dinners) especially at resorts that have more than 1 sit down dining (looking at you Jiko and Citricos). Keep one for families that are staying at the resort and want a nice dinner, and one for a more calm adults only atmosphere. We’ve been pretty annoyed by screaming 3 year olds during our $250 Jiko dinner and such. That’s one thing that is really nice at Palo and Remy on DCL. If I’m going to spend $250-500 on dinner it’s nice to have a little peace and quiet. I already did my time as a parent and spent 20 years sitting out on these activities to keep the kiddos happy and not be a nuisance to others, so let me have a little serenity when I can get some now! haha.

  15. I’m absolutely sure it’ll be a nightmare to get a ressie for! I did Space 220 twice in one trip 2 years ago, and don’t feel much need to go to extreme efforts to get back in. It’s cool bit not THAT cool.

    I’m glad this isn’t going to be a corporate sponsor space again. While the three-story festivus center would’ve been far better, sometimes we have to take what we can form the corporate overlords ruining, I mean running WDW..

  16. I don’t have super strong opinions on this (being on the internet without a strong opinion? gasp!), but I lean toward disappointment with is being 21+ only. The menu (or lack) will likely determine whether families with children want to go there or not (we never visited Oga’s until recently when they added the flatbread and cheese bread food options). Abracadabar doesn’t have age restrictions (I believe) and you don’t see throngs of kids in there either. That said, because I wouldn’t tend to go anyway, not being able to (at least, with kid in tow) isn’t really that big of a deal.

  17. This fits the bill for my family. After an exhausting day walking around EPCOT in the blistering Florida heat, it’s really nice to sit down and enjoy an adult drink in air conditioning with a nice view.

    Yes, there are plenty of places to get an alcoholic drink in EPCOT, but walking around while imbibing isn’t my idea of fun. Just offhand from memory, most of the sit-down restaurants at EPCOT don’t have good views, so this fits the bill perfectly. I’m not too picky about the interior of the view is expansive.

  18. As a currently Childless Millennial who is actively trying to grow his family, I still support this being an adults-only venue. It is nice for adults to have some spaces to themselves, and no one seems to have an issue with certain parts of every Disney Cruise ship being adults only. Furthermore, if you are in the “don’t drink in front of the children” camp, then it is arguably a *good* thing you can’t bring kids into this bar.

    I also agree with Tom, anyone looking to overindulge probably isn’t going here to do it for all the reasons he stated. It’s the same reason why in the real world, you are much more likely to see poor behavior in a pub/dive bar than an upscale cocktail lounge.

  19. To be honest, I could care less if it is adult only. They can give it a whirl and see how it performs. Initially, it will be all hyped up by the adult Disney and DVC blogger crowd. It will likely be popular during the different festivals. I am not sure it will be a long term success item. However, it is just another richie rich thing for those who enjoy thinking they are getting premium and saying they have done it or have a reservation to it, much like Space 220. Expensive and over-rated.
    It would have been nice to bring some more adult-only themed spots at Disney Springs. But we know they are trying to pull in adults to the parks even more than ever, so makes sense for now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *