Walt Disney – A Magical Life Audio Animatronics Show Review: Good, Bad & Ugly
“Walt Disney – A Magical Life” is the new stage show opening for Disneyland’s 70th Anniversary to preserve the history and legacy of the company’s founder. It’s a labor of love that introduces the man behind the magic to a new generation of guests via Imagineering’s most lifelike Audio Animatronics figure ever. This review covers the strengths and weaknesses of the newest attraction on Main Street in Walt Disney’s original magic kingdom.
Upon entering Disneyland, the first attraction guests pass is the Main Street Opera House, home to “Walt Disney – A Magical Life.” While the attraction and its lobby are the new attraction aimed at introducing Walt to a new generation and honoring one of the most patriotic and consequential Americans in our nation’s history, the entirety of Main Street is like a living tribute to Walt Disney. Inspired by his hometown of Marceline, Missouri, Main Street recreates the unique charm and quaintness of small-town America at the turn of the 20th century, filled with hope and optimism.
During “Walt Disney – A Magical Life,” guests will first experience a cinematic journey through an adaptation of the film, “One Man’s Dream” that also shows at Hollywood Studios in Walt Disney World. Following that, the attraction will culminate in a visit with Walt in his office, made possible through the magic of Audio-Animatronics storytelling. “Walt Disney – A Magical Life” will debut on the 70th anniversary of Disneyland’s opening day, July 17, 2025.
The finale of the show will raise the curtain on the first Audio-Animatronics figure of Walt Disney ever created. Guests will encounter Walt Disney like never before, through a medium he helped pioneer with his team when they created the Audio-Animatronics figure of Abraham Lincoln.
Guests will discover Walt in a re-creation of his office at the Studio, where he’ll share a few stories and thoughts on his career and philosophy. Taken from recordings spanning decades, original audio recordings of Walt’s own words were seamlessly blended to create these “great moments” for the performance.
The total run time of “Walt Disney – A Magical Life” is approximately 17 minutes, with the bulk of that being “One Man’s Dream.” (About 14 minutes for the film and 3 minutes for the Audio Animatronics.) Disneyland has revealed that “Walt Disney – A Magical Life” will use a virtual queue at first, which is mostly due to limited seating in the theater; we’d expect that to be gone before August rolls around.
After its initial run, the Main Street Opera House will welcome back “Great Moments with Mr. Lincoln,” which will play in rotation with “Walt Disney – A Magical Life.” Walt Disney Imagineering redesigned the stage inside the theater to accommodate a rotating turntable allowing for both productions to play in rotation. There are no show, story, or script changes to “Great Moments with Mr. Lincoln.” Aside from a modified set to fit on the rotating turntable back-to-back with “Walt Disney – A Magical Life,” the Lincoln presentation remains unchanged.
During a panel presentation, Senior Creative Executive Tom Fitzgerald shared how Walt Disney Imagineering has spent more than 7 years working on the ‘Magical Life’ project. Although the idea for a Walt Disney Audio Animatronics figure has floated around in WDI for far longer, they got started in earnest on July 17, 2018, and began consulting with the Walt Disney Archives and Walt Disney Family Museum on that date.
Executive Producer Jeff Shaver-Moskowitz explained how the team at Imagineering had put great care into ensuring the authenticity and accuracy of the Walt Disney Audio Animatronics figure, and the show as a whole. They dug through old interviews, finding historical footage and audio recordings of Walt Disney in his own words.
The creative team chose the approximate time period of 1963 when determining Walt’s appearance and for the ‘timeframe’ of the show. Imagineers explained this was done because it showed Walt at the pinnacle of his career–after several successful films, the opening of Disneyland and first big park expansion, as early work began on securing land for the Florida Project, and on the precipice of the 1964 World’s Fair.
During the show, we see Walt Disney at the height of his success, already an exemplar of the American Dream. This provides a fitting finale to “One Man’s Dream,” which spends much of its runtime focused on Walt’s younger years, overcoming adversity, big bets on himself, and finally achieving success.
Painstaking detail was put into every aspect of the production, and Imagineers collaborated with the Walt Disney Family Museum to ensure accuracy in everything they did, from the exact contents of his office right down to the specific rings he wore and hair product he used.
Several historical sources featuring dialogue of Walt are blended seamlessly to create the inspiring performance of the Audio-Animatronics figure. Imagineers reiterated once again that it was important that they not put words into Walt’s mouth–there’s no voice actor or AI used. It’s all original audio of Walt Disney, with the only adjustments made being sound restoration and rebalancing so that the interviews from different original sources flow seamlessly together.
It’s also a full circle moment, as bringing Lincoln to life was one of Walt’s biggest passion projects, and now this is that for present-day Imagineers. As kids, those creatives watched Walt Disney come into their living rooms on Sunday night television, similarly to how Walt learned of Lincoln as a child.
Prior to the debut of “Walt Disney – A Magical Life,” I have been a fierce advocate of this project. In my view, it is the most consequential attraction opening this year, and a necessary one. Although there’s been debate oriented around whether Walt or all of his family want this, I’ve found that unpersuasive–as explained in commentaries here, here, and here.
Today’s younger generations are not learning about Walt Disney. Or worse yet, they’re consuming anti-Walt propaganda and learning about who he actually was not. Walt no longer comes into our living rooms on Sunday nights, but slander about him is ubiquitous on our phones.
This worries me. Walt Disney as one of the greatest people of all-time; a shining example of ingenuity who should be studied as a role model as exemplifying the true spirit of America.
Whatever other arguments for or against a Walt Disney Audio Animatronics that might’ve existed at one time, this is the one that wins out for me in 2025, nearly 60 years after Walt Disney’s passing. Keeping his story and legacy alive for future generations is of paramount importance. Showcasing how the American Dream is attainable if you bet on yourself is important. With all of the cynicism that exists in the world, we need more optimists like Walt. He matters; his story matters.
Accordingly, I am on board with the Walt Disney Company trying to correct the record and combat this, so long as it’s not self-serving to corporate interests. Its founder needs some degree of safeguarding against morons and misinformation, and his legacy needs preserving in the same way the company zealously protects Mickey Mouse.
Suffice to say, “Walt Disney – A Magical Life” is badly needed; the world has changed so much from when Walt Disney’s Wonderful World of Color aired every weekend. This is precisely why it’s the most important attraction coming to either coast in the next 5 years, and I am “biased” towards its existence.
During a media preview ahead of its official opening, I was invited by Disneyland to experience “Walt Disney – A Magical Life.” Here’s my take on the strengths and weaknesses of the attraction.
Walt Disney – A Magical Life Review
Before even getting to the show itself, guests will encounter a new gallery in the lobby and pre-show of the Main Street Opera House. This features hundreds of images, art and artifacts spanning from Walt’s early career to where we are now, celebrating 70 years of The Happiest Place on Earth. Some of this has never been on display publicly, and there are some true deep cuts here.
Highlights include a display that partially re-creates Walt’s private apartment in Disneyland. There are also many, many awards–his 1955 Emmy award, Presidential Medal of Freedom, and of course, his pigeon-racing achievement award. There’s also a fantastic Audio Animatronics display that includes a few working AAs. (It’s rare to have non-static AAs on display outside of attraction.) This gallery is truly a treasure trove, and the best that I’ve ever seen in the Main Street Opera House.
I’m hoping to do a second post just about the Main Street Opera House, because it’s absolutely fantastic. Huge kudos to the passionate people from Walt Disney Imagineering, Walt Disney Archives, and Walt Disney Family Museum who put this together. This is an absolute home-run, and unequivocal success. I look forward to spending many, many hot afternoons poring over these galleries.
The stage show begins with a film adaptation of “One Man’s Dream,” which you might be familiar with from Walt Disney World where it plays at Walt Disney Presents (which used to be called One Man’s Dream). The documentary is largely narrated by Walt himself, and chronicles his life as a child in the Midwest, service in World War I, move to California, early animation, failure in losing the rights to Oswald, creation of Mickey Mouse, success with Snow White and Mary Poppins, and ultimately culminates in the creation of Disneyland and dream for the Florida Project.
Since this is a condensed version of the “One Man’s Dream” film, current Disney CEO Bob Iger has been added as a second narrator. While I personally would’ve preferred Julie Andrews or Steve Martin or Kurt Russell for this role, Iger helps streamline the presentation. I doubt any fans would’ve given this second thought or have any strong opinion about Iger’s presence one way or another if just watching the show. He doesn’t stick out at all, for better or worse.
My one nitpick with the film portion of the presentation is that it’s too long. Don’t get me wrong–I could (and have!) watched hours and hours of Walt Disney documentary. But in this case, the film to Audio Animatronics ratio is out of whack. I would also add that there’s no reason for the Florida Project to be present given that this is Disneyland, and in light of the time period chosen for the stage show itself. It’s especially odd to end on concept art of EPCOT Center, the theme park. There was actually a logical end point only a minute or so earlier in the film, with the World of Color splash screen and dialogue introducing Walt Disney–that would’ve been the perfect segue!
Even before it debuted, one big point of contention with “Walt Disney – A Magical Life” was the dialogue that the Audio Animatronics would deliver. Imagineers made clear that it was important to them that they not put words into Walt’s mouth–there’s no voice actor or AI used.
It’s all original audio of Walt Disney, much of which comes from the wide-ranging interview by Fletcher Markle for the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation in 1963. However, some different interviews were used, and the only adjustments made were for sound restoration and rebalancing so that the varying source audio flows seamlessly together.
For me, the biggest ‘issue’ is what Walt would say. They couldn’t just cherry pick Walt quotes to further a self-serving narrative about the parks needing to change or whatever. It needed to be a love letter to Walt Disney and his life, with no ulterior motives. When it came to the audio and short duration of the show, I was also worried that it’d be a veritable grabbag of famous-but-superficial Waltisms.
Quite honestly, given the significance of this attraction, the only way this could possibly be ‘ugly’ is not if the Audio Animatronics underwhelmed, but if he was turned into a corporate robot. Thankfully, absolutely none of those fears came to fruition.
There are a couple of famous quotes in there, but it’s more than just that. The chosen dialogue both humanizes Walt Disney and presents him in a humbling manner. In particular, I love the anecdote in this video where Walt describes an exchange with a kid, describing himself as a bee who pollinates and stimulates the studio. This was an unexpected inclusion, but a good one.
The bad is that despite being authentically Walt Disney, the audio doesn’t quite sound right from some seats in the theater. The speaker was placed behind Walt Disney, so it’s as if he’s actually speaking from on-stage. It’s a good idea in theory, but the execution leaves something to be desired. I was seated towards the back for my first viewing, and it didn’t sound right. Seated front and center for my second viewing, it sounded much better. But the hope is that this plays to packed houses, so having ~20% of the seats be close to perfect and the rest be spotty is a miss.
There still seems to be a bit of an issue with the rebalancing or restoration. I don’t purport to be a sound expert, but the voice heard coming “from” the Audio Animatronics doesn’t sound quite the same as “One Man’s Dream.” It’s still very obviously Walt Disney (because it is Walt Disney), but it’s as if something got a tad overcooked in post-production. Apples and oranges, but it reminds me a bit of the original Disney DVDs that got heavy-handed with noise reduction.
Then there’s the Walt Disney Audio Animatronics itself. This figure is incredibly technically sophisticated. Walt Disney is the most lifelike human figure that Imagineering has ever created. The WDI team achieved many innovations never done before in a humanoid figure, and actually had to wait for technology to catch up to requirements for Walt Disney on which they would not compromise.
The Walt Disney Audio-Animatronics is incredibly fluid and lifelike–Imagineers shared that it was important to capture and convey the way Walt spoke with his hands, how he furrowed his brow, and the twinkle in his eye.
The figure accomplishes the first ‘lean to stand’ motion for an all-electric figure and has a new type of realistic skin. Imagineering studied Walt’s muscle structure and the nuances of speaking and gesturing such as how the mouth falls when the figure is speaking, as well as the very Walt mannerisms and movements.
The technological leaps to achieve these far-reaching ambitions were called “moonshots” within the Imagineering team that innovated them. Some of the innovations were driven by necessity–there were certain movements Walt had to be able to accomplish to appear appropriately lifelike. Some just came about naturally in terms of pushing the bounds of the Audio Animatronics medium.
All of this is truly impressive. The project was clearly a labor of love for Imagineering, and they nailed so many of Walt’s mannerisms. As a regular attendee of “Wednesdays with Walt” back when this same theater at Disneyland hosted that, I’ve seen many episodes of Walt Disney’s Wonderful World of Color. In only a few minutes of the show, they managed to personify Walt Disney.
It was like the Audio Animatronics truly came to life, right down to tapping his hands during the introductory narration as if to say, “get on with it.” The achievements with the Audio Animatronics, its fluidity, and those mannerisms are second-to-none. From a technical perspective, Walt Disney is the best human Audio Animatronics we’ve ever seen.
That’s why it pains me all the more to say that the facial features just do not nail Walt Disney’s appearance. There’s just something slightly off about the figure. I’m not entirely sure what, or even if it’s one single thing. The face looks bloated, the cheeks and nose aren’t quite true to life, his neck is too stout–I’m not sure what else.
My hope is that it’s the underlying electronics that make replicating Walt’s more slender and elongated facial structure impossible, and that over time, Walt’s head will be iterated on and replaced as we’ve seen with other AAs. For now, his facial features and structure just aren’t all the way there.
This is not to say it’s bad; it isn’t. The presentation as a whole is impressive in-person. This is doubly true if you’re seated up close and centered, and catch just the right gesture, glance, and dialogue combo. There are seconds when suspension of disbelief is accomplished and it feels like Walt Disney is right there in the room. There’s a moving moment at the end when the background comes alive, Walt gazes at Mickey Mouse, and that glimmer in his eye is prominent.
But truthfully, it’s the mannerisms doing the heavy lifting there, and how they fluidly convey Walt’s body language. The face itself is comparatively underwhelming and looks off-model. It looks better in person and is passable as ~80% of the way there, but the first Walt Disney Audio Animatronics needed to be perfect. And it isn’t.
When you’re sitting in the room, the totality of the experience smooths over the faults. After initially being taken aback by his face, I became engrossed by the show and didn’t give much second thought to Walt being slightly off-model. The problem is that this show isn’t just being presented to the in-person audience. It’s going to be broadcast around the world on YouTube, Instagram, etc.
The whole goal is raising awareness about Walt Disney, the man and embodiment of the American Dream. Ideally, the online audience will exceed the real-life one, so I’m not fully persuaded by the argument that it looks better in-person. It does, but that’s not how everyone will experience “A Magical Life.”
In fairness to Imagineering, creating an Audio Animatronics of Walt Disney is an unenviable task. He’s got to be one of the most charismatic, animated, and distinctive-looking people to have ever lived. (Whenever I watch “One Man’s Dream,” I’m reminded by just how much child Walt looks like adult Walt.) Moonshots or not, there’s no way a robot was ever going to match the man himself.
The Walt Disney Audio Animatronics is also done no favors by the fact that the audience just finished watching ~13 minutes of real life Walt Disney footage. That essentially offers an easy and direct side-by-side comparison. That’s something with which Walt himself did not have to contend when creating the Abraham Lincoln Audio Animatronics.
There’s no video of Lincoln, only what exists of him in our minds and imaginations from the history books and historical photos. His likewise could be 80% there and that’d be fine. Heck, his voice actor could change over the years and most guests wouldn’t bat an eye. (Aside from those of us dorks who still miss Royal Dano.) By contrast, pretty much every single Disney fan can close their eyes right now, and see and hear Walt perfectly.
However, it’s also fair to point out that Lincoln is not the only human Audio Animatronics created by Imagineering in the last several decades. Much more recently, we’ve seen three AAs of the sitting president. While the first one of those was largely derided for his ‘melty-face’ appearance (and plausible conspiracy theories about originally starting as a different person entirely), the current generation is pretty much spot-on. Arguably more true-to-life than Walt Disney in “A Magical Life.”
Ultimately, it’s disappointing that Imagineering managed to nail so much with the Walt Disney Audio Animatronics, including technological moonshots that I’d imagine would’ve been more difficult to achieve, but missed on the facial features. My hope is that they have a chance to revisit the model in the future, just as they’ve done recently with Hall of Presidents.
The twinkle in Walt’s eye, movements, and mannerisms are all there. They knocked it out of the park with so much of “Walt Disney – A Magical,” and it’s a fantastic attraction-as-a-whole, from lobby to exit.
But that makes it all the more unfortunate that the likeness is a bit of a miss. That’s the thing on which most fans seeing photos and videos are going to fixate. This could’ve been a 10/10 attraction, but instead, the face is going to overshadow all of the aforementioned high points.
My other hope is that Imagineer offers an extended cut of “Walt Disney – A Magical Life” in the future. Once I quickly got used to the likeness and stopped fixating on his facial features, that faded into the background (so to speak) and it really was like listening to Walt talk about his life. And I could’ve listened to that for hours and hours.
That’s a good problem to have, and if at the end of the day, my biggest complaint is that the Audio Animatronics Walt Disney wasn’t on stage for long enough, that should be a fairly strong endorsement of the show. Let’s just get the Walt Disney Audio Animatronics all the way to 100% by the 75th Anniversary, because I maintain that this is the most important attraction at Disneyland. Its very existence and being a love letter to Walt Disney that introduces the man and his personification of the American Dream is an asset to Disneyland, guests, and modern society as a whole.
Planning a Southern California vacation? For park admission deals, read Tips for Saving Money on Disneyland Tickets. Learn about on-site and off-site hotels in our Anaheim Hotel Reviews & Rankings. For where to eat, check out our Disneyland Restaurant Reviews. For unique ideas of things that’ll improve your trip, check out What to Pack for Disney. For comprehensive advice, consult our Disneyland Vacation Planning Guide. Finally, for guides beyond Disney, check out our Southern California Itineraries for day trips to Los Angeles, Laguna Beach, and many other SoCal cities!
Your Thoughts
What do you think of the Walt Disney Audio Animatronics? Is it enough to get his likeness ~80% of the way there and nail the mannerisms and other features? Or did the company’s founder deserve nothing short of perfection? Thoughts on the “Walt Disney – A Magical Life” stage show as a whole? Excited to finally see Walt Disney honored with a show and first-ever Audio Animatronics figure? Do you agree or disagree with our assessment? Any questions? Hearing your feedback—even when you disagree with us—is both interesting to us and helpful to other readers, so please share your thoughts below in the comments!
I found this post to be interesting and thought provoking for a number of reasons. The attraction is significant and compelling, as is it’s positioning, the technology, fan and guest reaction and more. There are two points I wanted to share.
The first is about audio-animatronics… I think they’re truly remarkable, awe-inspiring technology. There is a timeless quality about them that really does make them special, even magical. It’s a rare technology for which newer versions don’t simply make older iterations outdated. New AAs are more advanced, but earlier generations continue to charm. They are also special in uniqueness, their mechanical ingenuity, and broader technical innovation. I hope they are always a defining part of Disney parks and attractions.
The second is about the approach to the project itself… The care and attention to detail, the earnestness, the sincere desire to maintain a sense of integrity, despite other competing factors is also remarkable. From the insistence on “not putting words into Walt’s mouth”, regardless of how that might have simplified and arguably improved the end result, opening up any number of possibilities, to technical innovations “on which they would not compromise”. It’s an inspiring approach, and I believe really should be the standard by which all meaningful, constructive work is measured.
The passion of Walt and his Imagineers for the park. The passion of the present day Imagineers working on the project. The passionate approach of the Walt Disney Archives and Walt Disney Family Museum. Passion is the common thread. Everything else, all of the financial and technical elements, the skill and knowledge, etc. are of course necessary components of any advanced project, but not sufficient without the kind of passion that sets the tone, the direction, priorities, and ultimately defines success. I see how the project and attraction is a full circle moment, but it also feels like an answer for many of modern Disney’s ills. Intentionally or not, it strikes me as an assertion of what works, and why, when priorities can often feel scattered or conflicted. Lead with passion, and clarity follows.
As for the face… I believe what’s lacking is a little honesty that comes from a willingness to be transparent about challenges, and in so doing invite the public to engage with and understand the project more meaningfully, to champion it as much as judge. It takes a kind of trust that I’m not sure exists.
Tom Hanks in Saving Mr. Banks looks far more like Walt than this thing does.
If they were going for Robert DeNiro…nailed it! This is so disappointing compared to the concept art. I’m sure it’s still interesting but I had hoped for better.
All I can say is “where is Blaine Gibson when you need him?” Big Time Disney fans will know what I mean.
The face of the Disney animatronic is reminiscent of the face of Donald Trump in the Hall of Presidents.
Technical innovations aside, Disney’s face, and his voice, for that matter, are not on the same level. Hopefully the imagineers will take care of matters soon.
I think another problem with this project is that Disney is still operating like they have the public’s benefit of the doubt, but that isn’t true anymore. So, in their typical fashion, they kept this all very secretive and then unveiled it…to a bad reaction. But they’ve been working on this sculpt and figure for years…had they released images of it last year or earlier, they would have gotten the reaction from the past couple days way back when they could have done something about it.
They need to start including the public in the process and be more iterative based on the feedback, to inoculate themselves more from “bombs.”
“They need to start including the public in the process and be more iterative based on the feedback, to inoculate themselves more from “bombs.””
I think we’ve already seen this happen with Piston Peak.
In this case, it seems like they had a hard deadline of July 17 (on a project that was already pushed back by 2 months). We don’t know how long they had to install the set and test & adjust the audio or lighting. The turntable was the big component of the theater project that has taken forever to get done.
While I agree with the idea of what you’re saying, I wouldn’t start from the premise that this reaction is catching Imagineering by surprise. I don’t have any inside info, but some of the way this project was being positioned now makes more sense to me if operating under the assumption that Disney knew it was going to be off-model and didn’t have much recourse for that. Just a guess/hunch, though.
Ive seen so many of Walt’s innumerable televisIon appearances over the years long after he passed that I’ve normalized the idea of a representation of him as an avatar, AA or whatever. Ironically, it’s also made me a stickler, and that head simply isn’t good enough for ABC-era Walt when it’s not moving. It may be that it look better in motion and that it captures his unique facial movements, but it will *have* to do so. (The Roys look more like Walt than this does, don’t they?)
Im guessing that’s why they edited One Man’s Dream down by only two minutes? Got to keep the total length about equal with Mr Lincoln. (LOL Pete!)
In addition to that awful face and head, what about that left arm? It just wanders to his hip area and stays there. At least they could have had him place his left hand to rest on his waist above the hip. That would look natural. They should also have used snippets of his actual voice. They have the technology to make it flow naturally. You would think that they would put all their efforts into making a perfect likeness of the man who created the very company they belong to and is so well known around the world. Perhaps they should have done a Mickey Mouse animatronic, instead of cobbling together a mickey mouse Walt Disney!
If this was an actor playing Walt Disney, I would’ve thought “Wow, that man really does look like Walt! That’s some good casting.” But of course, he’s *not* and actor, and one of the benefits of using an Animatronic instead of an actor is that you can make the figure look exactly like the subject. And they failed at this. That’s pretty disappointing.
You are correct that something is needed to counter the Walt Disney slander that’s out there. But the inauthentic face and poor audio aren’t going to make me rush out and see this. And even if they got the animatronic right, I am surprised to hear it’s only 3 minutes long.
What exactly is the “slander” out there? I’ve seen stuff that’s critical of Walt but nothing that was inaccurate. Walt might have been a great American visionary, and he certainly deserves kudos for how he revolutionized animation, theme parks and entertainment in general, but he was not perfect. Pointing out his flaws is not “slander”. I’d rather have an accurate representation of his whole character and history than a sanitized version of it – but of course I don’t expect that at the park that bears his own name. You can argue that Walt was a product of his time, except he had contemporaries who did not share some of his views and would have cringed at many of the racial stereotypes he included in his work – going so far as to ignore contemporaries who made their misgivings clear to Walt. Disney as a company has quickly walked back its acknowledgments of racism when the former president retook office. That, IMO, is way more harmful than any “slander” about Walt.
Can it Jay. You are seriously delusional..
I’m pretty surprised at how much the face doesn’t look like his. I have no doubt that it’s incredibly hard to replicate his image – there’s probably endless tweaking to be done – but I would’ve guessed it’d turn out better. Also, for all the work that went into it, four minutes seems crazy short!
I agree with another commenter though, that as much as I love Disney’s AAs, they suffer from the “uncanny valley” effect when they try to replicate actual humans (as opposed to cartoons). I personally find them simultaneously fascinating and creepy. I think that’s actually part of the fun for me, but I bet this Walt will potentially creep out a ton of people. Ha.
I think it looks like Tom Hanks as Walt Disney.
Ooh I can definitely see that now that you mentioned that!
The sound struck me as off in watching from your video, too.
But nothing amuses me more than the fact that, instead of turning in his grave, Walt now gets to turn on a turntable opposite Abe Lincoln.
It’s like the Tantalus curse, in that Walt’s AA will forever be just a matter of feet from his hero (and prized AA) Mr. Lincoln, and yet every time he turns to get a good look at the president, Abe will be turning away, just out of Walt’s view, at that exact same moment.
This sounds like it would’ve made for the perfect Twilight Zone episode twist. Walt would’ve loved it.
I appreciate they worked hard on this and the detail, but I find it kind of creepy actually to have something this sophisticated of an actual human. I’d rather they focus on great animatronics from their IP. Like upgrade the awful dated Frozen animatronics.
Tom,
Being a child of the 50’s, who watched Mickey Mouse Club (in black and white, of course), Walt Disney’s Wonderful World of Color (on Sunday night, if I recall correctly) once my parents had bought a color TV, I am thrilled that an AA tribute has been created to honor the man whose values shaped much of my character (and numerous other kids from my era.) Hopefully, parents will direct their kids to watch this show before they allow them to run to other areas of the park. Whenever I have gone to the parks with my grandkids, I have always been quick to point out Mr. Disney statues (both Walt and Roy) and make the aware of the contributions both made to the experience they are enjoying.
I’m sad to hear that my first impression of how the figure looked weren’t solved by seeing it in person. I agree this seems like something that will need to be addressed, and probably quickly. In many ways it’s probably (unintentionally) great they can easily swing Lincoln right back around (full time) if they need to do that work sooner rather than later.
I wonder if this is one of those cases where they knew it wasn’t 100%, and ARE working on it still, but absolutely HAD to have this open on July 17 2025…
I’m definitely in favor of this attraction in theory, but the face is definitely an issue. Honestly if I’d looked at one of your photos of this AA with no context, and was asked to guess “which famous person from the 1960s is this?”, it would have taken quite a few guesses before I arrived at Walt Disney. Perhaps it wouldn’t be a big issue for the majority of folks who don’t know or remember precisely what he looked like in real life, but of course all of those guests will have just watched an extensive film on the real person, so the image is fresh in their minds.
From the audio I’ve heard, the voice doesn’t sound quite right either — I was almost convinced it was an actor trying to imitate Walt’s cadence. I’ve heard Walt’s voice countless times, so I’m not sure why it’s not “clicking” for me as being authentic. As DrStarlander’s comment below notes, perhaps it’s that we’re used to Walt’s projected “TV persona” voice from various shows/specials, and what we’re hearing is closer to his “one-on-one conversation” voice.
Regardless, I’m still interested in experiencing this attraction. That may be a slight downgrade from “excited,” though.
Thanks for the balanced review. The little bit I saw online was pretty negative. I agree the face looks off, not bad but not perfect. I wonder if it’s like the Hall of Presidents, where the earlier presidents look great, but the ones we’ve seen a lot on TV (for me, that would be Reagan and onwards) don’t look quite right.
I can’t wait to see this! After just traveling to San Francisco two months ago to see the Walt Disney Family Museum, it’s clear that comparatively few people are going to make that trek despite the overall quality and depth. This has the potential to introduce Walt as a person to so many more people in a manner that Walt himself would have approved of.
As usual, I appreciate your very fair and honest reporting. It is so tiresome to see the sensational online rage-bait or those that will never admit any faults at all. I ultimately agree with you that the most important aspect of this attraction is dispelling all the slander about Walt Disney and getting across how he was a true, optimistic American. He is an important historical figure with lots of charisma, and his outlook on life and the American Dream is educational and salutory to our modern culture. Yes, we all can see that they didn’t get the face quite right. But I am sure that original Lincoln animatronic Walt made didn’t either. It’s about telling the story well and not resorting to sterotypes or propaganda, which it sounds like this attraction avoided. Again, great job and thanks–it is so hard to be a fair reporter these days, and yours is one of the only outlets on Disney that has consistently earned my trust.
I wonder if instead of using theater lighting, if they used projection mapping lighting techniques they could keep the sides of his face darker, (regardless how he turns his head), and that would make his head look narrower, especially from a distance in the theater.
As for the audio, I think an issue is that the recordings are of him talking while sitting and in this show he is standing and supposedly projecting to a live audience, and those are very different situations. Go watch an interview with a CEO, and then watch them speak to a crowd or do a TED Talk. I’m not an expert but it’s like the difference between speaking from your larynx vs. lungs, or something. That’s what they need audio engineers, and maybe some AI, to help simulate.