New Island Tower at Polynesian Village Resort: Opening Date, Timeline & Progress Photos

Walt Disney World is building a new DVC Island Tower at Polynesian Village Resort. This post shares the opening date, booking timelines, when we expect points to go on sale, room photos, and a look at construction. Plus, our opinion of the Disney Vacation Club expansion and why this is likely happening. (Updated September 10, 2024.)
Located on the shores of Seven Seas Lagoon and on the monorail line to Magic Kingdom, the Island Tower replaces Disney’s Spirit of Aloha Dinner Show. The new Island Tower will essentially be between the existing Polynesian Village Resort and Disney’s Wedding Pavilion, which itself is adjacent to the Grand Floridian.
This high-profile Magic Kingdom resort area has already become overcrowded in recent years with the addition of the Villas at the Grand Floridian. A new tower will only exacerbate that, and could end up putting undue strain on infrastructure such as the monorail. Fortunately, it’s also adding amenities that should, in theory, help reduce strain on the Great Ceremonial House.
“It’s no secret that our Members and guests love the monorail resorts at Walt Disney World,” said Bill Diercksen, senior vice president and general manager of Disney Vacation Club. “Expanding our Disney Vacation Club offerings at the Polynesian would give our Members and Guests yet another incredible option for staying close to the magic while making vacation memories that last a lifetime.”
Plans for the Island Tower at the Polynesian include a variety of guest room types, new recreation offerings, and dining options. DVC will continue to release more details and glimpses inside the Island Tower as the opening date draws nearer.
Speaking of its debut, the Island Tower at Disney’s Polynesian Villas & Bungalows will open on December 17, 2024.
All guests can now book the Poly’s Island Tower online or by contacting (407) 934-7639. Currently, only cash rate reservations are available. Disney Vacation Club members will be able to make points-based reservations at a later date that has yet to be announced.

This being DVC, points are really the bigger concern. On that front, there are still several unknowns. The first is what the point charts will be like for the Island Tower. Our best guess is that they’ll resemble Disney’s Riviera Resort–the newest DVC resort at Walt Disney World–but with a slight “Poly Premium.” Similarly, existing members are wondering when these point charts will be released. Honestly, we expected them already, so we’ll go with “any day now.”
The next unknown is when DVC sales will start for the Poly’s Island Tower. There’s still nothing official on this front, but predictions are a bit easier: October 1, 2024. This is several months behind Disney’s Riviera Resort, but everything about the Island Tower has been delayed as compared to that (so many other actively selling properties is the likely reason).
October first is the Polynesian’s anniversary, and we suspect Disney will choose that date as a way to “honor” that or something. In reality, though, it’s more meaningful as the start of Disney’s new fiscal year, which is always a time when the company always targets for sales, price increases, etc.

Then there’s pricing. Past precedent, logic, and rumblings would all seem to dictate that the Island Tower will sell for the same prices as the Villas at Disneyland Hotel: $239 per point. With no benefit of inside information, it would be unwise for me to go out on a limb and question this. I’m going to anyway. My expectation was (is?) that the Island Tower would break the $250 per point barrier, or at least hit $249.
My thinking is that the Polynesian is a fan-favorite Walt Disney World resort and, regardless of how I feel about the exterior of the Island Tower, this thing is a license to print money and will have robust demand from day one. And that’s even at a premium price point. Disney Vacation Club knows this, which is likely why they pushed for a hideous tower here in the first place–to maximize room inventory in a high-demand location.
In the event that they aim too high, there’s always the possibility of future incentives to help sales. I guess the alternative is a lower base price, no incentives, and a price increase in early 2025. That also seems possible. Just something to consider as you debate if/when to buy.

Finally, there’s the question of when points bookings will open.
This will be tiered, as always. New Poly purchasers will likely be able to make reservations almost immediately–maybe within a week or two after sales start. From there, existing members will be allowed to book, probably one month later–by November 17, at the latest. It’ll be interesting to see whether DVC draws a distinction between new Poly owners, current Poly owners, and current owners at other resorts.
In the end, whatever happens with all of the above will be on a condensed timeframe. There’s already a shorter runway ahead of the December 17, 2024 opening date. That’ll be even truer if DVC waits until October 1, 2024 to start sales. Regardless, we’re expecting news very soon and will keep you posted!

Now let’s turn to the latest updates for Fall 2024. First up, Walt Disney World has revealed the New Moana Pool Area, Restaurant & Castle View Gardens.
Wailulu Bar & Grill will feature indoor and outdoor seating areas and a bar space with views of Cinderella Castle at Magic Kingdom. The dining room will be adorned with Polynesian-inspired artwork including floating tropical fish sculptures. It’ll also have Moana paintings and an abstract Polynesian Stick Chart, an ancient navigation tool used to traverse the seas.
The Island Tower will also be home to Cove Pool, a brand-new zero entry pool offering even more opportunities to relax. It’ll also feature Moana’s Voyage, a whimsical new splash area that will feature life-size sculptures of Moana and her iconic canoe.
There will also be exclusive access to four tropical terrace gardens for those staying at the Poly’s Island Tower. Each terrace garden will feature vibrant artwork, lush foliage and seating areas. The terrace gardens promise big views of the golf courses or Seven Seas Lagoon, making them spectacular spaces for viewing Magic Kingdom fireworks.

Disney Vacation Club has also shared a First Look at Guest Rooms for the Island Tower at Polynesian Resort.
The new Poly tower will offer villas brimming with original artwork inspired by the Polynesian Islands, wayfinding and the natural elements: earth, water, wind and sky. Each guest room will also feature custom art inspired by Moana.
In our view, these rooms look pretty good with a lot of depth and texture, albeit a bit too much beige and neutral colors. But we never expected the rooms to be an issue, as that’s something DVC does exceptionally well.
Now let’s turn to a construction update as work progresses on the Polynesian tower as of September 2024. Not much has changed since our last update a couple months ago–more painting on the exterior and some scaffolding down–which is presumably because work has moved inside the Island Tower…







It’s interesting to watch the work–to the extent that it’s still visible. The Island Tower looks better with these coats of paint than it did as plain concrete, but that’s not saying much. It’s still ugly. But hey, at least you won’t be able to see the outside when you’re staying inside it, I guess?
The boxy tower is incongruous with everything else around the monorail loop, and sticks out like a sore thumb. That’ll be the case when it’s fully finished, since it’s obviously not going to get any shorter or have a visual profile consistent with the existing Polynesian Village Resort. I still can’t believe Disney thought this was acceptable to build on the shores of Seven Seas Lagoon. It was one thing with Disney’s Riviera Resort or Gran Destino Tower, which are comparatively isolated, but this is part of the ‘skyline’ of Magic Kingdom’s monorail loop.
This Island Tower at the Polynesian is progressing even faster than did Disney’s Riviera Resort or Gran Destino, and those went up pretty quickly! It’s also amusing how much faster Walt Disney World builds resorts versus attractions. Maybe “amusing” isn’t the right word. It’s a little discouraging. Defenders of Disney will point to the comparative complexity, which is at least partly fair. But CommuniCore Hall and Plaza and the surrounding trees in EPCOT aren’t exactly the pinnacle of Imagineering. The unfortunate reality is that Disney purposefully prolongs construction timelines in many of those projects to spread capital expenditures over multiple fiscal years. But I digress.
The bottom line is that the DVC tower at Disney’s Polynesian Village Resort should easily make its December 17, 2024 opening date.

In other news, Disney Vacation Club has officially confirmed that the Island Tower will be part of the existing condo association at the Polynesian Villas & Bungalows. This is exactly what Disney Vacation Club did with the Big Pine Key addition at Grand Floridian, so it’s not a total shock.
This means a few major things. First, all current direct and resale owners of Disney’s Polynesian Villas & Bungalows will have access to the new Island Tower as part of the 11 month booking window, and those who buy at the Island Tower will have access to the legacy inventory of the bungalows and studios in the longhouses.
It also means there will be a combined 2066 ownership end date for all owners. Annual dues will also be the same for the Island Tower as they are for the existing Poly Villas. Currently, dues are $8.23 per point, but we’d note that these are based on actual costs, so the addition of the Island Tower could, in theory, increase or decrease dues.
We’d expect a slight decrease–economies of scale and all that–especially since diluting costs on those over-the-water bungalows has gotta be a good thing. However, labor costs have caused all resorts to increase in the last few years, so don’t expect amounts to actually drop. It should be more of an offset, whereas other resorts will likely increase during the same timeframe.

In our view, adding the Island Tower to the existing association is the right move. Several years ago, we addressed a common question: Why is Disney Vacation Club Availability So Limited? That’s worth reading, but in case you don’t want to bother, part of the reason was the bungalows. Adding the new Poly tower to the current condo association should help dilute those points, improving overall availability.
Additionally, this provides more variety for DVC members who already own at Disney’s Polynesian Villas & Bungalows. This will add duo studios, 1-bedroom villas, 2-bedroom villas, plus the brand-new two-bedroom penthouse villas, as well as a different type of deluxe studio than in the current longhouses. This will make the Poly Villas far more versatile.
Finally, it won’t be subject to the dreaded resale restriction, since that does not exist as part of the current condo association. I’m starting to wonder whether this protectionist “experiment” at Disney’s Riviera Resort was deemed a failure, and perhaps we won’t see it at the Cabins at Fort Wilderness or Reflections – A Disney Lakeside Lodge. (Then again, it did appear again for the Villas at Disneyland Hotel, so perhaps not.)
All of this makes buying at the Polynesian Villas & Bungalows more attractive to us. Granted, that’s because we’d probably only consider buying via the resale market–and I’m still very hesitant until both seeing this in person and experiencing the degree to which it burdens the resort’s infrastructure. One thing is for certain, though–this seals the deal that we wouldn’t buy at Disney’s Riviera Resort!

Disney’s Polynesian Villas & Bungalows currently has 380 Disney Vacation Club villas, including the largest Deluxe Studios at any Disney Vacation Club resort at Walt Disney World. There are also the unique over-the-water two-bedroom Bora Bora Bungalows, which are not nearly as popular and have been problematic for their impact on the points pool.
This follows other work around Disney’s Polynesian Village Resort in the last few years. That included enhancements to the Great Ceremonial House, a new porte-cochère, and rebuilt monorail station. All of that looks good, a nice step forward for the resort that maintained its thematic integrity while bringing needed improvements to the aging property.
Room refurbishments were also part of the Poly’s overhaul. See our Review, Photos & Video: New Moana Rooms at Polynesian Village Resort for a tour and thoughts on the changes from our most recent hotel stay. If you’re looking at the existing DVC rooms, see our Review, Photos & Video: New Rooms at Polynesian Villas.
Polynesian DVC Island Tower Commentary

I realize change is inevitable, but I’ll miss this path and the beaches it passes. I’ve spent many a morning photographing the sunrise over here, using the twin and triplet palm trees on these beaches to frame the Polynesian’s longhouses.
Newer Walt Disney World fans may not realize it, but this stretch of land was once relatively tranquil. I don’t recall what it was like before the Wedding Pavilion was built in the mid-1990s, but up until the Villas at Grand Floridian, it was a peaceful area with large swaths of beach and green space between the Polynesian and Grand Floridian. Now, there’s a lot of parking and development, with more on the horizon. Really has a “paved paradise to put up a parking lot” kind of feeling to it.
My sincere hope is that the Island Tower is built as if it were a standalone resort like Riviera Resort or the planned Reflections, rather than in the style of Bay Lake Tower or the Villas at Grand Floridian. Meaning, that it contains counter and table service restaurants and other amenities.
The last time we stayed at the Polynesian, the beach was packed with guests during the Disney Enchantment fireworks–to the point that there was literally no available space–and the lobby was incredibly crowded with people waiting to be seated at ‘Ohana and elsewhere. The existing Polynesian infrastructure is often already stretched to its breaking point, and this tower needs to provide relief to that. Adding guest rooms without amenities will further exacerbate those problems, so we really hope that isn’t the plan.

Regular readers will recall that I was harsh about the proposed Reflections – A Disney Lakeside Lodge (above), which was supposedly a “nature-inspired” resort. It was slated for the former River Country water park location along the shore of Bay Lake between Wilderness Lodge and Fort Wilderness.
Reflections – A Disney Lakeside Lodge was one of the projects put on indefinite hold as a result of the closure. Based on Walt Disney World’s activities on that construction site and scrubbing all references to Reflections from the internet, the project was safely assumed to be cancelled. I was ecstatic. Absolutely over the moon in response to its cancellation. Reflections was a half-baked plan from the start, and Disney not proceeding with it was a good thing.
This Poly tower news makes me wish that Reflections – A Disney Lakeside Lodge were never cancelled. Not because I’ve suddenly had an about-face on Reflections (far from it), but because it would mean that this very-similar looking project at the Polynesian would not be happening.
Perhaps it would be simply a matter of forestalling the inevitable, with the site between the Grand Floridian and Polynesian Village Resorts slated for future expansion down the road. I’d still roll the dice on that. At least delaying development might mean getting something that looks appropriate for the area, and has some semblance of theme.

As for commentary about the design, I had to check my calendar when I first saw the Poly tower concept art, thinking maybe it was April Fools’ Day. Much to my disappointment, this is not a lame joke. (It is lame, just not a joke.)
I won’t rehash all of it here, but my criticisms of this new DVC tower at the Polynesian are nearly identical to those of Reflections. That’s in no small part because this project bears a striking resemblance to the cancelled Reflections tower. (My bad–Imagineers were inspired by the original Poly plans. Sure thing.)
Disney’s recent approach to developing hotels adjacent to existing resorts doesn’t inspire much confidence, and this looks like a generically modern design that would be at home in Holiday Inn’s portfolio.
Anyone who has been to pretty much any major metro area in the last few years has undoubtedly seen something at least vaguely similar to this Polynesian addition. It looks a lot like mixed-use developments in Anaheim–not to mention the Disneyland Hotel DVC tower (below), or even the cancelled Reflections plan.

That these three designs are virtually indistinguishable despite being located a three very thematically-different resorts should say all that needs to be said. Despite Disney’s best efforts to invoke past plans and history to preemptively stymie criticism of this unambitious addition, the actual “inspiration” is simply modern, generic hotel/condo/apartment towers.
Perhaps some of you will dismiss this as needless negativity, especially those who were looking forward to Reflections or are big fans of recent Walt Disney World resort additions. That’s obviously your prerogative, and to each their own.

The thing is, we have not been negative about every hotel change at Walt Disney World. To the contrary, we’ve been more positive than the average reader about recent resort reimaginings, changes, and expansions. The DVC conversion at Grand Floridian makes complete sense, and those rooms look nice. The new lobby at the Contemporary is fantastic.
Beyond that, most of the new room designs in the last few years are generally good, with Riviera Resort (above) providing the template for how those should be done. Every DVC room redo since then–from Saratoga Springs to Boulder Ridge and even the new Disneyland Hotel–has been a marked improvement. Disney is getting function right–it’s form that’s the problem.
More specifically, it’s the new builds and cost-cutting design that I find problematic. In the last few years, Imagineering has really found its groove with the interiors, including room redesigns. By contrast, it seems like the prevailing sentiment is that the exterior and integration of theme simply does not matter. It’s cheaper to build boxy towers, so that’s what they do.
When you compare Walt Disney World resorts built before the mid-1990s to ones built or redesigned in the last few years, there’s generally a clear division. Current projects are often interchangeable with real world Holiday Inns or other mid-tier chained brand hotels.

Look at the difference between BoardWalk Inn or Beach Club and the new casino tower at Coronado or the Fairfield Inn Des Moines Airport Riviera Resort. There simply is not the same depth of detail in the designs with new builds at Walt Disney World–they are not themed.
One explanation is that Disney simply doesn’t want to spend on themed architecture, which eat into profit margins on DVC contract sales. This makes sense, and also explains why Disney is adding these towers alongside existing resorts rather than making them standalone properties. By building adjacent to current hotels, they can share infrastructure or don’t need to offer every amenity on-site.
Another explanation is that the company wants to make things as crowd-pleasing as possible so as to not alienate any potential customers. The thing about this approach is that when you try to appeal to everyone, you end up appealing to no one. Either way, I don’t get it.

I’m not entirely unreasonable about development at Walt Disney World, I just think it needs to be done in a sustainable way, and one that’s respectful of what already exists. Like Gran Destino Tower or Disney’s Riviera Resort, I have no doubt that this Poly tower will have great guest rooms, offer worthwhile features, and functional enhancements to the Poly.
I’d imagine it’ll also add 1-bedroom and larger rooms to Disney’s Polynesian Villas & Bungalows, something that has been requested by DVC owners for years. From that perspective alone, I suspect many members will consider this addition a “win.”

As much disdain as I have for the exterior appearance of Gran Destino and the Riviera, they are both excellent resorts if all you care about is their substantive offerings and view them only from the inside, or in isolation. To be fair, that may be the case for many of you.
The outside appearance of Four Seasons Orlando isn’t exactly anything special, but it’s a great hotel on the inside. The critical distinction is that Four Seasons is known for superlative service, not Disney design–and the Four Seasons didn’t impact the existing ‘skyline’ of Walt Disney World when built.

Personally, I think it’s very fair to say that Walt Disney World should aim higher as themed design and immersive environments are its calling card. Exterior design being “good enough” for downtown Anaheim should not be the bar by which Imagineering is measured. Something being sufficient to “complement” Angel Stadium is not quite the same as it fitting with the flagship Grand Floridian or iconic Polynesian. Those are exemplars of themed design, and if additions aren’t capable of matching their look, they simply shouldn’t be built.
At this point, I feel like I’m wasting my breath with all of this, though. If you don’t look at the concept art for the Polynesian tower at the top of this post and immediately think that it’s out of place, there’s probably nothing I can say that’ll change your mind. We simply have different tastes and expectations about the caliber of product Walt Disney World should be delivering given the costs and its rich legacy. To me, this is all very obvious, but I suppose reasonable minds may differ.
Planning a Walt Disney World trip? Learn about hotels on our Walt Disney World Hotels Reviews page. For where to eat, read our Walt Disney World Restaurant Reviews. To save money on tickets or determine which type to buy, read our Tips for Saving Money on Walt Disney World Tickets post. Our What to Pack for Disney Trips post takes a unique look at clever items to take. For what to do and when to do it, our Walt Disney World Ride Guides will help. For comprehensive advice, the best place to start is our Walt Disney World Trip Planning Guide for everything you need to know!
YOUR THOUGHTS
What do you think of this Walt Disney World news? Are you optimistic or pessimistic about a new tower being added to Disney’s Polynesian Village Resort? Happy that DVC is expanding the Poly Villas, or wish they’d build a new stand-alone resort? If you’re a Polynesian (hotel) fan, are you upset by this or indifferent to it? Do you agree or disagree with our assessment? Any questions we can help you answer? Hearing your feedback–even when you disagree with us–is both interesting to us and helpful to other readers, so please share your thoughts below in the comments!

Very surprised by this. As a current DVC member with our home resort being the Polynesian I’m curious, do you think our points will be able to be used in this new building the same as the current? Book 11 months out and all that. Or will they sell this as a whole new package that we would have to buy into or only be able to book 6 months out. That would be super lame.
This is the question of the hour for poly owners … myself included!!
We stayed in the Poly villas Presidents week and totally concur on the infrastructure issue. That place was bursting at the seams with people everywhere. Its tough to get into the table service restaurants and Captain Cooks had a long wait and not enough seating. As for the fireworks…. we had a lake view so wanted to watch from our room but apparently (based on my research at least) Disney doesn’t even pipe the music into the rooms like they do at the Contemporary so EVERYONE goes to the beach. There are many simple-ish ways they could diffuse the burden but they don’t.
While I’m one of those DVC owners who welcomes 1 and 2 bedrooms at Poly, I saw the headline and expected some bigger version of the longhouses. This picture was a shocker. Especially after they managed to do Aulani so authentically, why go with such an out of place design? (Other than cost, we all know its cost) Also the loss of Spirit of Aloha which we really enjoyed years ago.
Disappointed, and hoping the concept art is deceiving AND they add the quick service and other facilities that are needed. I will likely book there but would not buy there.
Hate what they are doing – messing with my favorite resort.
This new tower is going to mess with the sight lines & aesthetics of the Lagoon.
They have so much land – let’s shoehorn it into the Poly to save building out any further services
Disney is becoming on miss-match mess and the hell with any of the original design plans for any of the parks or resorts
What a disaster! Completely out of synch with the rest of the Poly, it’s like they are tacking on a cookie-cutter Hyatt House to an otherwise thematically-integrated (except for those stupid overwater bungalows) resort. It’s like Disney is trying to shoot itself in the foot these days.
ugh, this just looks gross. i do not understand the cancellation of sightlines at wdw…
When the new Poly tower photo came across my feed this morning my first thought was actually “are they bringing back reflections?” Good to know I’m not crazy
Maybe Disney should stop expanding Resorts to house even MORE guests and instead focus on building a 5th theme park to absorb some of the crowds. The current parks are busting at the seams and there’s no end in sight, even with all of the price hikes. It’s insane! Another option would be to open the park(s) during the nighttime hours and sell “day” and “night” tickets, with the nighttime ones being sold at a premium for the experience. I’d love to spend all night in the parks, and I’m sure I’m not alone!
Amen, sister.
When I saw the announcement this morning my first thought was, “Oh Tom is not going to like this.”
Absolutely heartbreaking to see such an ugly building put down between two of the best at WDW. Even if one can’t afford to stay there the sightlines will be ruined for all guests.
I get the design criticism, but ultimately, I love the Poly so much and as a DVC member with a family of 5, I cannot own there due to lack of villas. Studios don’t cut it for us anymore with teenagers/daughters, and I would much rather have a villa than 2 connecting studios with no washer/dryer or kitchen. This news means I *may* be finally able to add Poly to my points portfolio, and I can only imagine that any 3-bedroom grand villa would be stunningly gorgeous and immersive – not to mention offer spectacular MK views. From that perspective, I’m totally on board. But as a semi-Disney design “purist,” I’ll admit I hate it.
This is where I am. I prefer 1 bedroom villas, and Poly has been out since the teens grew to six feet. I’m sure from inside your 1-bedroom Villa looking at the MK fireworks, this resort will be amazing. I’m guessing that’s what they are going for more than a themed exterior. Although why not just do something Aulani style?? I agree about the crazy crowds. It’s off putting as a resort guest. Hopefully it will have more common areas and quick dining or maybe signature. Not more character ADRs that will bring extra guests! We can hope…
Yes, Larissa! And something like Geyser Point would be fantastic, too.
So only to comment on whether it will be the same condo association:
From Disney’s perspective — Keeping it in the same condo association can create a better mix of room types, easier to keep balanced, as the existing is all Bungalows and studios. It could encourage more people to book and use the bungalows, since it would increase the number of Poly home owners. Administratively, it would likely be simpler to combine into a single cost-sharing unit. For sales of the new units, access to the bungalows could be a selling point. (though I wonder how many people buy Poly with sugarplum dreams of staying in the Bungalows but then never do so).
Finally, there is still plenty of time left on Poly contracts — to 2064, that owners would still get 42 years as of 2024. Same as th eGFV expansion.
Reasons they may want to do a whole separate association, more like CCV:
To keep contract expiration dates staggered. There is going to be a major “2042” issue in the not-that-distant future. Do they want a repeat in the early 2060’s, with every Magic Kingdom resort expiring between 2060 and 2068. A new association would stagger a big chunk of units to 2074.
-Unlike GFV, there the original is really quite small. The combined new and old GFV only become a mid-level sized DVC property. But the Poly is already a fairly large DVC with over 300 units. Combining with a large new tower could make Poly one of the biggest DVCs.
And with a whole tower, likely with its own pool and amenities, it may have enough going on its own that it doesn’t need to be combined with another property.
-And from Disney’s perspective.. They want to strongly encourage direct sales over re-sale purchases. This was the reason for the Riveria re-sale restrictions. Creating a new association with re-sale restrictions drives more people away from re-sale towards direct purchases. You’d also better control demand for thew new tower is re-sale buyers can’t use it.
Basically.. on whether it becomes a new association or folded into the old, I could see it going either way.
Good analysis–thanks. I was singularly focused on the architecture while writing this.
With all of that laid out, my bet is that this is rolled into the existing condo association. When it comes to the counterpoints, the first is long-term, so that’s irrelevant to those running the show today. The second is fair but not make or break. The final one probably doesn’t matter given the cachet of the Poly, so might as well kick that can down the road.
I do think the re-sale vs direct incentives are a bigger deal than just sales of Poly two years from now. I suspect Disney would love to basically erase the re-sale market. Let everyone who wants DVC buy direct from Disney. So it’s not just future Poly owners, but you want to discourage people from buying re-sale at OKW, SSR, etc… As it stands, “if you buy re-sale, you can’t stay at Riviera, but you can stay in the new Grand Floridian studios, you can stay in the future Polynesian tower..” — it’s not a strong disincentive to buying re-sale. But if the caveat of where you can’t stay gets bigger, then re-sale becomes less and less valuable. The re-sale restrictions were a long-term plan, if you don’t continue along that plan, it won’t pay the long term dividends for Disney.
Now, all the reasons to continue the same association may outweigh the benefit of the re-sale restrictions. Which is why I can see it going either way. But I do think wanting to push people away from re-sale long term is a strong reason for Disney to start a new association.
Ugh. Very disappointing. I will say this makes me want to stay at the Poly even more… because I want to do my dream stay there *BEFORE* they build this eyesore.
I’m not against adding to Poly, but just not like this. It’s too tall, but at the very least if you’re going to build something that tall it needs to be more strongly themed.
It looks like the JW Mariott on Marco Island to me. I love that hotel but I don’t think it fits in with the immersive theme of the Polynesian. The Polynesian is a great hotel and yes it is busting at the seams as is.
I’m so disappointed in Disney. I often thought that the Poly needed additional DVC rooms, but not at the expense of Spirit of Aloha. This cheapens the beauty of the Poly and Seven Seas Lagoon. What’s next? Are they going to permanently close Hoop-Dee-Do (knock on wood) because of profits?
It’s been two years to the day since WDW closed down the parks, and still no word on if/when the dining plan/Tables in Wonderland is coming back. “Soon” isn’t a time frame. “Soon” is being a cop-out.
C’mon Disney. I know you can do better than this.
I completely agree with you Tom, and since I have a degree in architecture, it’s official, lol! As a Fort Wilderness kid (growing up) I was horrified by Reflections and so happy it was cancelled. Riviera looks very bland to me but I haven’t experienced the interiors. There’s only one explanation for this, cost. It costs a lot to make those special Disney touches we all love and they can throw up a tower like that relatively quickly. I can only hope this meets at least some of our expectations.
Ughhh
It’s a floor or two too high for me, but otherwise I don’t hate the design. There. I said it.
I DO hate the fact that it will clutter the Seven Seas Lagoon skyline, overclutter the Poly’s amenities, bring more chaos to an overworked and undermaintained monorail line, and otherwise cheapen the privilege that is staying at the Polynesian – a privilege that some people save years for, and certainly won’t get any cheaper.
Just book me in Moorea, please and thank you.
This is awful and the visual blight will affect both the Poly and GF. At least the visual blight of Riveria only impacts one resort.
Everything here stinks of short termism. Their only strategy is to build on existing plots with existing infrastructure with minimal theme to maximise income as quickly as possible.
A far more ambitious and successful project would be to branch the Skyliner to a new man made lake north of Conorado and build a few new resorts around there, with the expansion of skyliner therefore paid via DVC cash. In time this could then extend to connect skyliner to AK.
This won’t happen as they’re too short sighted. Bluergh.
Agree with this. Expand the skyliner to other resorts such such as AKL and build elsewhere. They are ruining it at the poly. Also I think WDW doesn’t need more hotels but rather more attractions or another park to absorb crowds but that is crazy talk.
With new DVC towers, I think there’s a “tragedy of the commons” situation. People don’t buy into an individual property, they buy into the whole proposition, and there are more than enough incredible (mostly legacy) resorts to ensure new purchases.
I hate it too — especially as a non-owner affected by unthemed design — but I can’t argue with the (short term) logic. By the time this imbalance starts affecting sales, Disney can sell the expiring legacy resorts all over again.
We have enjoyed the Aloha Dinner Show and were planning to take our grands to it when we go in January 2023. It feels like all of the magic is slowing slipping away and for what? Profits? That is not magical nor is it what Walt envisioned when making Walt Disney World. Yes, things change and progress needs to take place. The question is are you going for progress just for progress sake or are you doing this to help be a part of making the magic happen for people?
My husband is now digging in his heels about going because so much has gone by the way side and changed. We have been going to Disney for decades and there feels like any incentive to stay onsite is gone (farewell Magical Express), extended park hours in the evening and many other things. During higher inflation times, please charge us more money and take away fast-passes….
This 100%. My partner and I look at what a Disney trip (on either coast) looks like now versus when last we went in December 2019 and all the times we did WDW and DLR trips before, and we just…can’t work up any enthusiasm at all to even consider planning a return trip. The value and the flexibility that we always built our trips around have both throughly vanished. On the other hand, we’ll probably visit my family back home in NYC instead this year, and it’s not lost on us that a week in New York will be SIGNIFICANTLY less expensive than a week at WDW.
I echo all the design-related criticisms. My biggest issue with being a paying guest at the Polynesian is the crowd-levels. The lobby is cacophonous in the evenings, with lines spilling down the stairs, and strollers lined up in the hallways, as people dine at ‘Ohana. Trader Sams crowds block the sidewalk as they wait for tables and the beach becomes overrun with folks looking for a “romantic” fireworks view. The noise and crowd level detract from the relaxing vibe of the current design. I can’t imagine this situation will improve after a few hundred rooms are added. I hope there are new dining and shopping venues to absorb traffic.
Exactly why every time I’m on property at the Poly, I can’t wait to get back to Coronado or Caribbean Beach.