Lakeshore Lodge is Not a Mixed-Use Disney World Resort Hotel, But That Doesn’t Really Matter.
Walt Disney World submitted filings with the State of Florida for Lakeshore Lodge, which reveal rules for resale, the use of a trust, and that the resort will be almost exclusively DVC. Here’s the latest, along with our commentary about why all of this is a distinction without a difference as we cover guest room types, resort wings, aggressive 2027 discounts, DVC’s 2042 problem and much more.
As basic background, Disney Lakeshore Lodge will celebrate the beauty and magic of nature as seen through the eyes of Disney artists and storytellers. Inspired by Walt Disney’s admiration for the great outdoors, the resort’s design highlights animated stories rooted in nature, with subtle nods to classic films, from the lush forests of Bambi and the colorful winds of Pocahontas to the glacial landscapes of Brother Bear.
Located along the tranquil shores of Bay Lake, Disney Lakeshore Lodge will feature floor‑to‑ceiling windows that welcome natural sunlight and showcase views of the local flora and fauna, allowing the outdoors to flow into the architecture, artwork, and ambiance. Guests follow a lush tree-lined driveway and arrive at Disney Lakeshore Lodge beneath a porte-cochere, inspired by a bird in flight and surrounded by cascading water features.
Most notable for our purposes today, Disney Lakeshore Lodge officially offers 967 themed accommodations, ranging from studios to spacious multi-bedroom villas. Disney Lakeshore Lodge also introduces standalone one and two-bedroom Lake Houses positioned along the waterfront, similar to the Cascade Cabins at Wilderness Lodge. (The expectation here is A-Frame Cabins and Treehouse Villas.) We’re actually expecting a huge variety of room types at Disney Lakeshore Lodge; far more than Island Tower or Riviera Resort.
Disney is promising more details about dining, recreation, amenities and design elements in the coming months in the lead-up to active sales starting. Disney Lakeshore Lodge is slated to open in Summer 2027, so there’s some time to slowly pull back the curtain on its accommodations, amenities, and marquee features. The latest developments we have are not via announcements by Disney, but regulatory filings…
Not a Mixed-Use Resort on Paper
Disney has submitted licensing paperwork to the Florida Department of Business & Professional Regulation for Disney Lakeshore Lodge, the eighteenth DVC timeshare destination. While details are sparse, a few new pieces of information can be gleaned from the filing.
According to DVCNews, the declaration accounts for 45,552 timeshare weeks. Given that there are 52 weeks per year, that figure roughly translates to approximately 876 vacation homes. This leaves 91 rooms unaccounted for from Disney’s previously-announced 967 room count. That could be explained by lock-off units or who knows what else. It doesn’t really matter.
This would also mean that Lakeshore Lodge is a fully DVC resort, as opposed to the 50/50 or 60/40 mixed use breakdown that was previously anticipated. Technically, it would have at least a 98/02 allocation that is typical of Disney Vacation Club resorts once you account for the 2% of rooms that are retained by Disney for cash bookings, maintenance, etc. It could also be a 90/10 split if those 91 rooms actually are unaccounted for, and not just a quirk. I’m not going to get in the weeds on the math because, again, it doesn’t matter.
What this means is that, at least on paper, Disney Lakeshore Lodge is a DVC resort and not a mixed-use property with separate hotel wings and Disney Vacation Club wings. But as explained deeper in the commentary, this doesn’t matter and is not worth fixating on. It’s just a fun mystery.
Palmetto Trust Likely
The filing also references a Use Plan, which points towards the increasing likelihood that Disney Lakeshore Lodge will be part of a Trust similar to the Cabins at Fort Wilderness Resort.
What is unknown is whether or not Lakeshore Lodge points will be combined in the same Palmetto Trust as The Cabins. Moreover, if both are part of the Palmetto Trust, how that would impact booking windows, amenities, and more. It would stand to reason that combining two resorts into the single Palmetto Trust would be done in order to treat the Cabins and Lakeshore Lodge as one combined entity.
With that said, this is not conclusive of that. There could be more boring and mundane reason to use the Palmetto Trust for both, and with no member-facing implications. I’m skeptical of that, but I also am cognizant of the fact that I don’t know what I don’t know. My gut just says if the Palmetto Trust is being utilized, it’s to unify the resorts.
The obvious upside of that is making the slow-selling Cabins at Fort Wilderness more attractive. The obvious downside is that the Cabins could become an albatross for Lakeshore Lodge, making it less attractive. This is all very surface level analysis, but again, I don’t see the point of getting too in the weeds here. We’re only a few months away from DVC revealing all.
Resale Restrictions Confirmed
The filing also suggests that Disney Lakeshore Lodge will implement the same modern resale restrictions, which began with Disney’s Riviera Resort.
These restrictions have since been expanded to the Cabins at Fort Wilderness and Villas at Disneyland Hotel, the only other two all-new Disney Vacation Club resorts built since Riviera (Island Tower at the Poly and Big Pine Key at the Grand Floridian were both add-ons).
Under these draconian resale rules, secondary market sellers and buyers of Lakeshore Lodge are essentially handcuffed. You might say “good” to this notion…until you buy Lakeshore Lodge and need to sell it for whatever reason. We are vehemently opposed to resale restrictions, and view them as an unreasonable restriction on property rights. At the same time, reasonableness is in the eye of the beholder, and if prospective purchasers are apprised of their existence and elect to buy anyway, that is their prerogative.
We’re not going to fixate on resale restrictions here, as this rule is neither new nor surprising. For more, see Major Disney Vacation Club Resale Restrictions.
Lakeshore Lodge is Massive, Making It Mixed-Use By Default for Decade(s)
The most interesting element of this is that Disney Lakeshore Lodge is not a mixed-use resort hotel. Rather, it is more appropriately viewed as a DVC property akin to Disney’s Riviera Resort.
As noted above, I view this as a distinction without a difference. Disney Lakeshore Lodge will have 876 vacation homes. To put that into perspective, this would make Lakeshore Lodge the second-largest DVC property, just behind Disney’s Saratoga Springs Resort which has 888 vacation homes, plus the 60 Treehouse Villas.
It cannot be overstated how massive of a resort complex Disney Lakeshore Lodge is. Photos don’t do it justice. This 10-story, 967 room resort will be Walt Disney World’s biggest since Art of Animation or Animal Kingdom Lodge. By contrast, Wilderness Lodge has a 7-story main building and 728 rooms in total. It’s slightly smaller than the Grand Floridian once including the DVC wing, and larger than the Poly or Contemporary.
Lakeshore Lodge’s massive size is precisely why this is a distinction without a difference.
To put this into perspective, Disney finally declared the final 20 vacation homes at Disney’s Riviera Resort into the DVC room inventory with the Orange County Comptroller (also per DVCNews). More than seven years after the first declaration was made on February 15, 2019, Disney has now declared all 341 Riviera vacation homes for the DVC inventory. At the current pace, Riviera should sell out by Summer 2027.
With nearly triple the room count, it could be reasonably assumed that Disney Lakeshore Lodge will take three times as long to sell out. Potentially longer once you acknowledge the reality that resorts typically sell faster once they first open active sales, and gradually slow over time. Of course, Riviera Resort did have to contend with COVID in there, but that was short-lived. It also benefitted from stimulus money and soaring consumer spending.
Accordingly, it could take 20 years or longer for Disney Lakeshore Lodge to sell out. If I were a betting man, I’d put that number at over 25 years, just based on the likelihood of slowing sales at some point plus a recession or two in the mix.
These declarations are important because all of the undeclared rooms are available for cash bookings on DisneyWorld.com when a resort first opens. This is why Disney’s Riviera Resort had deep discounts when it first opened offering 40% off, and the same is true of the Cabins at Fort Wilderness today. There’s a lot of inventory that does not yet “belong” to DVC and thus is not available for members to reserve with points.
Disney’s Riviera Resort first declared 69 of 341 rooms when it started selling back in 2019. This meant that, as of opening night, approximately 80% of that fully Disney Vacation Club resort was actually available exclusively for cash bookings. Its categorization as a DVC resort as opposed to mixed-use or a hotel was irrelevant. As a practical matter, it basically started as a hotel that has gradually shifted to DVC over time.
The same thing will be true of Disney Lakeshore Lodge when it opens in Summer 2027.
No matter what the eventual declarations might be, Lakeshore Lodge is going to be 80% or more weighted to cash bookings when it opens in Summer 2027. That’s just how the mechanics of this work. Over time, as more of the resort is gradually declared, that number will tilt in the favor of DVC. But again, that’ll take two decades or more!
In the meantime, cash will be king. And I’d hazard a guess that number will actually be higher than 80% in 2027 due to the overall room count. An initial declaration of 69 units at Lakeshore Lodge (a la Riviera) would leave approximately 92% of the property for cash bookings.
Expect Aggressive Discounts on Lakeshore Lodge
Maybe the initial declaration will be larger (I hope so, since I’ll be booking via points and having a larger allotment makes it less competitive), but we’re still looking at over 80% of this property that is functionally a regular resort sold on DisneyWorld.com that first year-plus. That is a massive influx of inventory, and it absolutely will happen regardless of everything else discussed here.
It’s also safe to expect aggressive discounts on par with or exceeding the 40% off that Disney’s Riviera Resort offered its first year. Keep in mind that Riviera had far fewer rooms to fill, and debuted with the novelty of the Skyliner (which was also a huge asset in the era of the virtual queue for Star Wars: Rise of the Resistance).
I doubt Walt Disney World will advertise 50% off rates for Lakeshore Lodge, as that would make it look like a failure (even though it’s just a matter of the room count), but could see flat-rate nightly rates a la the Disney+ deals we’ve seen. A Resort Studio for $369 per night wouldn’t surprise me in the least.
Mixed-Use in Practice?
The more interesting, but less important (and admittedly, more in the weeds) question is whether Disney ever intends for Lakeshore Lodge to be fully declared into DVC. My suspicion is that they do not.
If you’ve been following the saga of this resort closely, you might’ve noticed that we’ve “confirmed” certain details before Disney started pulling back the curtain on Lakeshore Lodge. That was partly thanks to what was plainly visible in construction photos, but also because a lot was filed or leaked about Reflections over the years.
One of those things was that it would have separate hotel and DVC wings. Not a huge surprise there, as that’s how the other mixed use resorts all work. DVC units and hotel rooms are fundamentally different in layout, size, and features.
Expect Excessive ‘Resort Studios’ Inventory
Next to nothing has changed about this project from Reflections to Lakeshore Lodge. The only thing at this point is the presence of Treehouse Villas, which are still presumed to be part of the plan but just haven’t begun construction since they’ll be located on what’s currently a staging site for the A-Frame Cabins.
It’s possible that Disney has quietly converted the hotel wing into Disney Vacation Club accommodations, I’m skeptical of that. Meaning there’s likely to be an entire wing that’s going to become Resort Studios (a la Big Pine Key at the Grand Floridian), which are basically glorified hotel rooms with a microwave added.
Given that this is going to be a Disney Vacation Club resort as opposed to mixed-use, at least some of those will be available for booking with points. Disney can’t create a room category and then just not offer it. But my gut, built on a mountain of assumptions any of which could be incorrect, is that the intention from day one is to only allocate a small percentage of these to DVC, and then always hold the rest back for cash bookings.
As for the “why” of this, my best guess is that there’s some boring legal explanation involving the Palmetto Trust. I won’t pretend to understand Florida timeshare law, but I could see a scenario where DVC cannot put a mixed-use resort into this type of trust, so the solution is to simply not call it a mixed-use resort.
Assuming for the sake of argument that’s accurate, we probably won’t have complete confirmation for about a decade. This “mystery” is going to have an unsatisfying resolution because Walt Disney World and Disney Vacation Club will have to maintain the legal fiction of it being a DVC property in marketing materials and everywhere else.
Our biggest immediate giveaway will be if there’s a large number of Resort Studios (or whatever they choose to call them). If this is a de facto mixed-use property, the presence of those Resort Studios will be the tell. Then we’ll have complete confirmation in the late 2030s, when Lakeshore Lodge “sells out” despite only selling 50% to 60% of its points.
DVC’s 2042 Problem
The final interesting (to me) angle is the ticking time bomb of the original Disney Vacation Club contracts expiring in 2042. That’s when all contracts at BoardWalk, Beach Club, and Boulder Ridge expire, as do some or most at Old Key West. (Plus Hilton Head and Vero Beach on the non-WDW side.) That’s easily over 1,000 units.
How that will unfold remains to be seen. Will Disney kick the can down the road by extending some of those resorts a la what they’ve already done at Old Key West? Will other resorts be resold? Will some be torn down and replaced by higher efficiency and occupancy towers? Will Hilton Head and Vero Beach be unloaded completely to third party hoteliers?
It’s unknown how all of that will unfold, but it will undoubtedly have a ripple effect on sales, bookings and more. And if Disney Lakeshore Lodge really is completely DVC, that puts it still in active sales whe the 2042 problem becomes pronounced. It’s hard to imagine Disney wanting to deal with both simultaneously, but perhaps I’m overestimating the extent to which 2042 will be an issue.
At the other end of the spectrum, it’s also possible that the hotel side of Walt Disney World doesn’t want the room inventory that Lakeshore Lodge would add to their books. This wouldn’t be the least bit surprising, as Walt Disney World’s hotel room count had been decreasing for a decade up until Island Tower opened, and even that’s only a slight temporary bump until more of that is declared. Otherwise, the trend has been offloading hotel inventory to Disney Vacation Club, not the other way around.
Maybe that’s happening with Lakeshore Lodge. Or perhaps this time it’s different, and what Walt Disney World actually wants is more desirable hotel room inventory via a Magic Kingdom park entrance hotel that’s closer than Grand Floridian. Or perhaps a property overlooking Villains Land at the rear of the park, or another mid-tier Skyliner resort, something at the park entrance of EPCOT or Disney’s Hollywood Studios. There are a lot of entirely plausible new hotels with locations that would actually be stronger than Disney Lakeshore Lodge, and I say that as someone who actually thinks that Lakeshore Lodge has a lot going for it!
If you’re considering joining DVC and want more guidance, be sure to read our Ultimate Guide to Disney Vacation Club. That guide covers the pros & cons, resale v. direct, how much money you’ll save, and other important things to know before taking the plunge. If you still can’t decide whether membership is right for you, “try before you buy” with the recommendations in How to Save BIG on Deluxe Disney Accommodations Renting DVC Points.
Your Thoughts
Thoughts on why Disney Lakeshore Lodge has shifted to being an all-DVC resort? Given all of the above, what do you think actually happens with the property in practice? Do you agree or disagree with our assessment? Any questions we can help you answer? Hearing your feedback–even when you disagree with us–is both interesting to us and helpful to other readers, so please share your thoughts below in the comments!
Interesting article. I’m hoping to be able to check it out next year as the pool complex looks awesome for our kiddos. When Riviera discounted their rooms upon opening, did that include the larger villas (1 & 2 bedrooms) or just studios? I’m wondering what the likelihood will be for promos on the bigger villas so we could maybe plan a trip with the grandparents…
Lakeshore Lodge looks like “giant Marriott” to me more than a fantastically-themed, dreamy lodge such as Wilderness Lodge or Animal Kingdom Lodge. I adore the latter lodges as well as the wonderful Ft Wilderness cabins. I am shocked by your comment that the cabins aren’t selling quickly. We have rented them twice at a reasonable price – cheaper than any luxury studio – and were delighted to stay in a roomy cabin with privacy between the bedroom and the kitchen, a lovely deck, wildlife (turkeys and a deer spotted in our “backyard!”) — all with a perfect balance between theming and modernization/utility. Any thoughts on why the Cabins at Ft Wilderness aren’t selling? I’d buy one if I could talk my husband into a DVC contract!
I imagine the high annual dues will be a factor
Nik is correct about high annual dues, but they’re also very taste-specific and limiting, with a layout not everyone likes. You’re essentially locking yourself into one room type for the next ~50 years, and at a resort with tedious transportation.
The people who love Fort Wilderness really love it, but that doesn’t describe most guests. And I say that as someone who loves it–and the cabins! (Our review: https://www.disneytouristblog.com/review-cabins-fort-wilderness-resort-campground-disney-vacation-club/)
Given the size and overall look of this resort it reminds of the Aulani more than anything else. Also, it’s worth noting, Disney has desired a lodge type resort in or near this location since the early 1970s, here is a link to an article I wrote in World of Walt on this issue – https://worldofwalt.com/disneys-lakeshore-lodge-decades-in-the-making.html (sorry Tom if I am breaking one of your rules)
As a current DVC member the main and buying points at a resort where I want to stay, the main issue I have is that the 45k+ plus points being sold are going to be used to book at my resort. I know the 7 months window is supposed to alleviate that, but now I have to have firm fixed vacation plans 11 months out.
On the other hand if I really like this resort and want to stay there year after year I will wait until I see it on the resale market and buy it at half price.
Keep adding hotel capacity but not park size, should have added a fifth gate years ago.
I’ve been expecting them to say this was a DVC resort and not mixed-use ever since the project restarted. Especially since they’ve been so cagey about it. Studios are the same footprint as a hotel room, and they are the most popular DVC room type. As you say, they can keep them in the hotel cash booking inventory for as long as they want.
Ok stupid question. We own at FW cabins does that mean we own at LL too?
We still don’t know yet.
Just one thing to factor in, long term:
January 2042. Less than 15 years after Lakeside Lodge opens, thousands of DVC owners will be homeless.
I can imagine a generous incentive being offered on 35-year direct contracts to the Boulder Ridge, Beach Club, Old Key West, Boardwalk owners, losing theirs.
(And yes, no way Lakeside Lodge is sold out before January 2042).
Wonder if this signals a slowdown of building new DVC properties.
When Old Key West members were given the chance to extend their contracts, only about 20% of them did. So in 2042 some members may just be done or will have aleady added on somewhere else with a longer contract.
What a great business model. I build a new hotel and take all the cash stay money while I sell off DVC. 20 years down the road when the hotel isn’t no longer new it is owned by DVC owners. And I know these owners will keep paying annual dues and coming back so I no longer have to try as hard to keep them coming year after year,
I agree the DVC vs. non DVC rooms seems kinda pointless unless there’s an important underlying implication, and it sounds like there’s not. I’m a bit more interested in the implications of Disney putting this many new rooms on the market. Wonder if they’re planning for a spike in visitors over the coming years?
I’m part of the 5% I guess and just wanted to say thanks for taking the time to write this piece!
Here are my thoughts:
I believe all resorts will eventually end up in the Palmetto Trust, with dues averaged and shared across the portfolio. Points will likely be sold and priced based on the home resort booking priority buyers want. All will have resale restrictions.
I think it’s very likely that Hilton Head and Vero Beach could eventually lose their Disney branding and be sold to another timeshare operator, such as Marriott or Hilton.
For Beach Club Villas, Boardwalk Villas, and Boulder Ridge, I could see them being stripped down to the studs, fully renovated, added to the Palmetto Trust, and then resold. If that happens, their point charts would likely be re-evaluated and increased.
There’s also a reasonable chance that Old Key West will undergo refurbishment, and Disney may find a way to move some of the expiring units into the trust. They could then resell booking privileges at that resort similarly to what they may do with Beach Club, BoardWalk, and Boulder Ridge. Point charts would likely be updated, but owners with extended contracts may retain access to legacy charts. Disney would likely need to wait until those extended contracts expire before moving remaining inventory into the trust.
“ Disney Lakeshore Lodge will have 967 rooms. To put that into perspective, this would make Lakeshore Lodge the second-largest DVC property, just behind Disney’s Saratoga Springs Resort which has 888 units including the 60 Treehouse Villas.”
Sounds like Lakeshore Lodge will be largest, not second largest. 967 > 888 + 60 (948).
I jumbled the comparison. It should’ve been vacation homes in both instances, as SSR has over 1,000 guest rooms by conventional metrics. I’ve updated accordingly.
I have a basic understanding of how DVC works, but I’m still not familiar with a lot of it. Is it not true that a lot of DVC members want to book properties which are not their home resort? For example, I keep hearing it’s very difficult for Beach Club DVC members to book at their home resort because almost every other DVC member is trying to book there; mostly for the pool area.
If the Beach Club scenario is true, I think it’s likely the same problem will exist at Lakeshore Lodge. Even if that resort is far from sold out, won’t it be constantly booked by other DVC members?
I also expect some serious security at Lakeshore Lodge for one significant reason: pool crashers. I remember years ago pool crashing got so bad at Beach Club that Disney had to add security screening there to make sure all the people trying to get to the pool area were actually guests. I heard that had to turn away a whole lotta people who were not Beach Club or Yacht Club guests. With the lazy river at Lakeshore Lodge, everyone in central Florida is going to try to crash that pool.
Your point is directionally accurate, but the difference with Lakeshore Lodge or any resort in active sales is that the declared inventory, while still a subset of the total inventory, is necessarily higher than the number of points sold. Meaning there’s a bit more of a buffer, for lack of a better term, that makes booking slightly easier when resorts first open.
Totally agree about the pool situation.
Further security / restrictions to ensure residents at the properties benefit would be welcome across the Disney portfolio including poly pool / beach etc.
You can book your home resort starting at 11 months. You cannot book at other resorts until 7 months. So provided you can plan that far out, you have a 4 month jump on DVC members with other home resorts. Of course, nobody will be booking with points 11 or 7 months out here for a while yet.
Tiny correction; you have put the Cascade Cabins as being at the Fort. As you know, they are at the Lodge 🙂
Thanks for the catch! Nothing like a mindless typo in the opening to discredit myself and everything that follows in the eyes of informed readers! 🙂
As a non-DVC member and someone with no interest in buying into it despite being someone who theoretically could benefit (always staying at deluxe resorts) I could not care less about any of this and I’m pissed that Lakeshore is not actually mixed use even if you say it doesn’t matter. Everything to do with DVC is vastly confusing to me and the jargon doesn’t help at all. I don’t know anything about points charts and use years and trusts, I just want to book a normal hotel room with no fuss, and I was really looking forward to trying Lakeshore. Like yeah Riviera had those crazy Visa deals when it first opened but if you couldn’t make that timeframe work (the debit got me in the door but I couldn’t get the time off, sadly), you were SOL because it quickly turned into one of the most expensive places on property, more than park walkable deluxes. It never gets discounts to speak of anymore, and the cheapest option, duo studios may as well not exist. Maybe you’re right and I’m wrong, and I hope you are, but I don’t see Lakeshore with its crazy pool complex going any other way.
In general, as a non-member it’s very frustrating the way Disney seems to have become a timeshare business that just happens to operate hotels and theme parks. More and more is taken away from regular guests and paywalled behind timeshare contracts. As a Poly diehard I Love Wailulu and mostly enjoyed my IT stay but I’ll never forgive them taking away Spirit of Aloha and sticking that tower on it; we once dreamed of getting married at Luau Cove, so it’s a bit personal. I don’t begrudge members getting more for the mountains of money they sink into it, but too often it’s at everyone else’s expense like turning public park spaces into member lounges. The economy being what it is I don’t understand why Disney thinks people have all this disposable income to buy timeshares anyway. People are already cutting back on vacations. Seems weird to me but I’m not a bean counter so who knows.
“I could not care less about any of this and I’m pissed that Lakeshore is not actually mixed use even if you say it doesn’t matter.”
This sentence probably describes 95% of people reading this, unfortunately. I kept telling myself to keep this one concise and avoid getting in the weeds when writing it, but just couldn’t help myself.
The bottom line for your purposes is that the crazy deals will last longer at Lakeshore Lodge than they did at Riviera. That’s true even if we assume for the sake of argument that the lazy river and everything else is a bigger draw than the Skyliner. (Again, I really don’t think that’ll be the case; Riviera has stellar amenities even beyond the Skyliner.)
There are still nearly three times the number of rooms here, and those will not be declared into room inventory until DVC sales dictate as much. This resort is going to be 80% or more cash bookings for 2027-2028, and 70% or more after that. Even assuming the most favorable sales projections, Lakeshore Lodge will *still* have more undeclared cash rooms in 2030 than Riviera did on its opening day!
Lakeshore Lodge is absolutely massive, and its size really cannot be overstated. All of this is a pretty simple numbers game. Deals will abound for a while, and there’s just no way Disney will be able to “get away” with the comical cash rates seen at some of the ~2% DVC resorts.
“The economy being what it is I don’t understand why Disney thinks people have all this disposable income to buy timeshares anyway. People are already cutting back on vacations.”
Since you reveal yourself as a Deluxe patron, you couldn’t possibly know why anyone will buy a DVC (?). Such a contradiction to not understand Disney fans’ actual financial situation. Disney has been catering to more wealthier patrons for years now. They succeeded in attracting more revenue despite flat attendance. DVC is product for wealthier clients to buy into the magic and they do.
“I don’t begrudge members getting more for the mountains of money they sink into”… as a self described deluxe resort patron, I’m betting you sink more money per stay than a DVC owner. Especially one that bought resale at a resort like Vero Beach, Old Key West, or Saratoga Springs. Depending on the frequency of your visits, it would be worth your while to read up on how DVC works and how DVC points are used to “pay” for a room as opposed to actual dollars. For the price of a one week stay at the Polynesian you could likely buy close to a hundred DVC points and use them to stay for a week at a deluxe resort for the next 15-30 years.
“I’ll never forgive them taking away Spirit of Aloha and sticking that tower on it”
same,.. that tree
No worries. Even Disney makes typos about the resorts. Easy to do when some of the names are confusing. Page 24 of Disney’s Files Spring 2026 issue refers to Grand Flo, when they definitely meant Grand Cali lol.
One thing you always hear about is a lack of availability, especially for rooms with a lower point threshold. Perhaps, these rooms will fill that void. While the “points” have already been sold, increasing attendance is a key component to increasing revenue.
We covered that at length several years back: https://www.disneytouristblog.com/limited-availability-disney-vacation-club-resorts/
In a nutshell, this will help by diluting the overall point pool, assuming the room mix is desirable. Cracking down on commercial DVC point rental, thereby increasing breakage (or decreasing utilization), is probably a more consequential move.