My Meeting with New Disney CEO Josh D’Amaro Confirms He’s the Best Pick for Parks Fans

I had a chance to chat with future Disney CEO Josh D’Amaro about his new role, and plans for the parks and leadership going forward. During a visit to Disneyland on Friday, Josh took time for a 25 minute meeting with me and six peers, answering questions in an on-the-record conversation. This post relays some of what he shared during the roundtable, along with previous experiences, and why I’m optimistic about the future of Walt Disney World and Disneyland.
Since Parks Chair Josh D’Amaro was named Disney CEO, there have been a lot of reactions. We’ve seen past and present Imagineers praise the move, including top dog Bruce Vaughn. Ditto executives, like former CEO Michael Eisner and DLR President Matt Ouimet. There have also been hot takes from Walt Disney World and Disneyland fans, including the predictable and inevitable backlash.
This was wholly unsurprising. Anyone but Walt himself being named Chief Executive would’ve prompted at least some contrarians to offer negative reactions. But this isn’t just internet edgelords, and it’s not sudden. Sentiment has soured in some circles on D’Amaro, and sometimes for fair reasons. Not only that, but with the exception of Bob Iger returning to replace Bob Chapek, there hasn’t really been clear consensus among fans on any leadership changes. Even that one was a brief honeymoon period.
Speaking of relationships, during their media tour to tout the arranged marriage between the two executives leading the Walt Disney Company into the future, Dana Walden, incoming President and Chief Creative Officer, shared how the two have bonded. In particular, Walden reminisced about a walk with D’Amaro during a corporate retreat at Walt Disney World, and how impressed she was when he swooped in Superman-style to help a crying four-year-old.
“We were at Walt Disney World, and it started pouring rain. We came across a little boy who had been separated from his family and was sobbing. I watched Josh in action. It was as if he didn’t have to think about it. He moved quickly, calmly, and with so much care,” Walden said. “The team reunited the child with his family so fast, and watching Josh in that moment spoke volumes. He cares deeply about every person who walks into our parks. He cares about people.”
Now, if I were (more) cynical, I might think that D’Amaro was cognizant of the eyeballs on him during a corporate retreat and this was a bit of a performance. Or maybe the anecdote is a bit hyperbolic to talk up D’Amaro and further the narrative of their close working relationship. When it comes to executives making appearances in the parks, there’s always the question of what’s genuine versus what’s for the cameras to cultivate a Walt-like persona. There’s only one little problem with this cynicism and D’Amaro…

There are hundreds, if not thousands, of stories like this about Josh D’Amaro spanning over the course of the last decade-plus. Anyone with a Disney-centric social media feed who opened Instagram or Facebook in the last week has seen a sea of selfies fellow fans have taken with D’Amaro.
Seriously, the dude has shaken more hands and kissed more babies (metaphorically) than Bubba in his prime. If this was all part of some calculated long game to ascend up the Disney ranks to the corner office with a shower, it was quite the elaborate production. I’m cynical, but not that cynical. What D’Amaro has done goes far beyond the obligatory photo ops, and is too long-running to not be genuine. Nobody faking it has that kind of stamina.
There were a few years when I spotted D’Amaro on the ground at Disneyland and Walt Disney World on countless occasions during his tenure as President of the respective resorts (and mine as blogger). He was basically on the ground as much as a blogger, albeit one who with actual responsibilities (and presumably better compensation).

D’Amaro would often appear in random places and without a huge posse. It’s one thing for him to be out and about on opening day of Star Wars: Galaxy’s Edge, a new attraction, or a special event. And unsurprisingly, I saw him around all of that.
It’s another to see him wandering through EPCOT, picking up trash in DCA while no cameras are on him, inspecting completed refurbishment work, having dinner at Takumi-Tei, or being randomly behind him in line with a guest at Mickey & Minnie’s Runaway Railway. Those are examples just off the top of my head; I didn’t foresee writing this post back in 2018 when I started crossing paths with him with such frequency.
I’m far from the only one (just seemingly the only one who never asked for a photo, judging by social media). When he was President of Disneyland and then Walt Disney World, there were regular reports and photos of him around the parks on social media.
After tens of thousands of Cast Members were laid off during the closure, D’Amaro was at Downtown Disney apologizing to Cast Members and allowing them to vent for hours on end. That was polarizing at the time, as some fans viewed D’Amaro as having his cake and eating it too. Subsequent revelations that then-CEO Bob Chapek was the architect of the layoffs, and was infuriated that Bob Iger had prevented them from being made earlier, recontextualize that.

D’Amaro’s ‘listening tours’ with employees are well-known, too. It seems like every other Cast Member has first hand experience with him, especially at Disneyland.
I’ve heard from countless Cast Members about D’Amaro since he was named President of Walt Disney World in November 2019. The most common sentiments shared were that D’Amaro “gets it” or “actually seeks feedback and listens” or that they would “follow him anywhere” because he is the real deal, a leader who cares about Cast Members and the guest experience.
I mentioned some of this sentiment during the meeting with D’Amaro, who only doubled-down on it.

During the conversation, one thing that D’Amaro underscore multiple times was how much he wanted to be the “same leader” he’s always been, just as passionate and approachable as ever. He joked that he was going to drive some people behind the scenes at Disney crazy with his desire to be on the ground.
He also shared that he had just spoken with a round of fresh Cast Members just coming onto the job earlier that morning, as that was important to him. So too was continuing his connection with the fans and parks. “I am not going to disappear,” he said bluntly. Much of the conversation could be summarized with that line; good luck to whoever is tasked with prying him away from the parks.
D’Amaro explained that it’s critically important to him to be present for face time with fans and Cast. I think this is underscored by his actions, in meeting with Cast Members and representatives from fan sites only a few days after named Disney’s new CEO. The fandom never had a seat at the table under the Chapek regime; he did not care what we had to say. Quite the opposite, and he made that abundantly clear.
D’Amaro wants to keep his finger on the pulse of the fandom and the in-park experience. “Anyone who disconnects themselves from that, you can kind of lose touch with reality. I’m not going to do that,” D’Amaro said. From my perspective, this was the most important thing Josh could’ve said during the conversation. (Well, short of a surprise Journey into Imagination 4.0 announcement; but this is probably more important in the bigger picture.)

At the risk of stating the obvious, Josh’s in-park experience is not that of a regular guest. Although he’s spent as much time in the trenches as an average blogger, the way he now visits the parks is fundamentally different.
Josh and I were both at Disneyland on Friday (he for photo ops with Bob Iger; me for photo ops with a gigantic DCA 1.0 map). However, he felt no friction during the arrival process of parking at Mickey & Friends, the hassles of security, people struggling with ID verification at the turnstiles, etc.
Nevertheless, there is value in his experiences at the parks. Most significantly, because he is talking to guests and Cast Members, letting them air their grievances, soliciting feedback, listening and (hopefully) acting. This is unlike so, so many Disney executives, some of whom have viewed the parks as “beneath” them. Having someone at the top who is actually passionate about the parks is huge.
So too is someone who goes out of his way to hear feedback firsthand, as opposed to it being carefully filtered by subordinates. A lot of feedback won’t be acted on, to be sure, but D’Amaro’s on-the-ground experiences and interactions will impact his leadership and decision-making, as will his passion for the parks. Those two things alone make a massive difference.

Over the last several years, this blog has not been shy in its favorable stance towards D’Amaro, and that’s the essence of why. We have not been unequivocally positive; we’ve expressed concerns about D’Amaro not having a high number of projects that were his from beginning to end, and especially the bungled EPCOT redesign. But by and large, he was the person we wanted to see named CEO.
Some fans have suggested that D’Amaro gets a “free pass” on bad decisions because he’s handsome and smoother than Chapek was. Essentially, that there’s very little daylight between Chapek, Iger, and D’Amaro; they are all cut from the same cloth and will make similar decisions at the end of the day, just with different optics.
This is condescending to all involved. It presupposes that most fans and Cast Members are superficial, blinded by beauty and forming opinions based on surface-level assessments. It assumes that only those with the supposedly ‘unpopular opinion’ are the only ones able to think in a deeper manner, and everyone else’s brain breaks when they see a pretty person.

In reality, Iger and D’Amaro are comparatively popular despite their similarities with Chapek because of their material differences. Tell me, how many times did you see Bob Chapek wandering the parks? How about chatting with random guests or Cast Members?
As someone who logs around 100 days in the parks per year, the number of times I saw Chapek make a non-media appearance was zero. He was the least-visible leader I’ve ever (not) seen. Equally important, he had an infamously contemptible attitude towards the fan community and didn’t even bother to hide it. Towards the end when the ship was clearly sinking, he pretended to care about Cast Members, but his actions never matched his words.
It’s actually a bit amusing that D’Amaro is treated by mainstream media as “another” Parks & Resorts executive elevated to CEO, as if that’s what Chapek was. Walt Disney World and Disneyland fans never claimed Chapek as one of our own; he was a Consumer Products guy, through and through. I can’t recall any positive stories about him from the frontlines.

Chapek did not seem particularly concerned with the guest satisfaction or Cast Member morale. He made countless cost-cutting decisions, launched the half-baked Genie well before it was ready for prime time, and degraded the in-park experience to an unprecedented degree, all while increasing prices at a record clip.
We heard repeatedly from insiders that guest satisfaction scores were anemic at the ‘peak’ of the Chapek regime, something we commented on in multiple posts at the time. We also heard that leaders on the ground on both coasts expressed concern and wanted to change this; Chapek was also infamously bad at listening to feedback that countered his decisions.
Never have I heard or seen so much Cast Member and fan rejoicing as on that fateful day in November 2022 when Bob Chapek was shown the door. Ask any Imagineer how much better the creative arm of the company is under Bob Iger and Josh D’Amaro, who brought back Bruce Vaughn. (Or just read this about WDI’s comeback.) For whatever overlap there might be when it comes to business decisions, the contrasts are stark when it comes to leadership.

People are what makes Disney, Disney. D’Amaro gets that. I don’t know that anyone has ever gotten that more than him. He has the compassion, humility, temperament, and desire to honor the legacy of the Walt Disney Company. That matters and is the antithesis of superficial.
Nevertheless, D’Amaro will undoubtedly make unpopular business decisions. It’s not all sunshine and rainbows from here on out, with the fan community having a champion in the CEO chair. There will be changes with which we disagree vehemently.
There already have been several of those during D’Amaro’s tenure as Parks Chair, and we have not been shy about pointing those out. We will continue to do so, and hope you all do likewise, as part of our job as the fan community is to hold leadership accountable. To act as a “check” and counterweight to shortsighted business decisions made at the behest of Wall Street. It’ll be nice to have someone at the top who embraces this honesty and wants feedback, even if negative.

One thing about which we are curious is how the Walt Disney Company will look different under D’Amaro’s leadership. It’s common for new executives to come in and quickly make their mark with a mix of symbolic and statement announcements, as both a way to extend that honeymoon period with fans and signal their own priorities. Something showing, say, one little spark of imagination.
During the chat, I asked D’Amaro about this, generally, and whether he’s given any thought to it. He laughed and said he’d only been told the news a few days ago, and wanted to get more acclimated to the new role first. This obviously was not the time or place for any news-worthy announcements, so I held off my follow-up Figment inquiry. But I’m sure that’ll be coming from someone at the upcoming shareholder meeting.
For whatever it’s worth, we do expect both a ‘guest experience enhancements’ package of announcements and substantive news within the first few months of D’Amaro’s tenure, likely a bit after he’s named a new Parks Chair. The timing will be interesting, as the 2026 D23 Expo is also right around the corner, but suffice to say, there’s some low-hanging fruit that would give the new team easy wins.

Speaking of the next Parks Chair, someone else asked about the timing of that announcement. D’Amaro gave a diplomatic non-answer, suggesting he’s not yet ready to make the announcement but also that it’ll be a difficult decision because there’s such a deep bench of leadership at Parks & Resorts. In Who Will Replace Josh D’Amaro as Head of Parks & Resorts?, our assessment was also that any of the top candidates are excellent options with decades of Disney leadership experience.
He was also asked about whether he has a pet project, similar to how Iger clearly is enamored with Pandora and all things Avatar. D’Amaro’s response was another diplomatic one, which was the pragmatic approach. After all, if he said something at one park, that’s going to create resentment among fans on the other coast. It’s a no-win situation. With that said, he sounded most excited about Villains Land at Magic Kingdom. It’s the one project he discussed more extensively, and was outwardly enthusiastic about it blowing guests away.
D’Amaro also mentioned Napa Rose as a specific, recent example. He shared how he was involved throughout the process, and had given feedback on the seating and was really proud of how that project turned out. As someone who also liked how that project turned out, especially the seating, this resonated with me.
I also appreciated this because Napa Rose was a restaurant reimagining, not a blockbuster expansion project, and seating is a fairly mundane detail. But those little details are part of what defines Disney, and his comments about Napa Rose struck me as especially “Eisnerian.”

Ultimately, it’s these little things that make a big difference when it comes to who is CEO of the Walt Disney Company. And I would argue that attention to detail, concern for the guest experience and satisfaction scores, and Cast Member morale are not little things at all. They are the essence of what makes Disney, Disney. Josh D’Amaro clearly gets this, and has the traits of a superlative leader and worthy CEO of the Walt Disney Company.
The team of he and Dana Walden at the top is not going to radically overhaul the Walt Disney Company, but no serious CEO candidate was. Fans who wanted paradigm shift were always going to be disappointed. What this new leadership arrangement ensures is continuity, and building off the foundation and fixes made in the last few years during the post-Chapek era.
Personally, I’m excited and optimistic as a parks fan first and foremost. We have a bright future ahead of us, with the company investing at least $60 billion on theme parks, and those expansion plans being overseen at the top by a parks person who gets it, cares about Cast Members, fans, and the outcome-determinative details. There’s a Great Big Beautiful Tomorrow (I’ll refrain from making the obvious D’Amaro pun) for Walt Disney World and Disneyland fans.
Need Disney trip planning tips and comprehensive advice? Make sure to read Disney Parks Vacation Planning Guides, where you can find comprehensive guides to Walt Disney World, Disneyland, and beyond! For Disney updates, discount information, free downloads of our eBooks and wallpapers, and much more, sign up for our FREE email newsletter!
OUR THOUGHTS
What do you think of Parks Chair Josh D’Amaro becoming Disney’s next CEO? Excited for an actual parks person to finally succeed Disney CEO Bob Iger? Think D’Amaro’s focus on fans and Cast Members illustrate how he “gets” Disney? Do you agree or disagree with our assessment that there’s a huge difference between Chapek and D’Amaro? Any questions we can help you answer? Hearing your feedback–even when you disagree with us–is both interesting to us and helpful to other readers, so please share your thoughts below in the comments!

Tom—
Thank you for your thoughtful observations about Josh D’Amaro and his elevation to CEO. Disney’s CEO will always be a celebrity figure, and D’Amaro will be no exception, particularly given a compensation package reportedly in the high eight figures, though still below Bob Iger’s recent levels.
Disney’s track record in leadership transitions is uneven. The long shadow of Walt Disney continues to complicate succession, Michael Eisner resisted leaving, and Bob Iger delayed his retirement multiple times. The pivot toward media and streaming over parks and experiences was very much Iger’s strategic priority, exemplified by the roughly $70 billion Fox transaction in 2019, and Bob Chapek’s much‑criticized tenure often reflected that pivot rather than an independent vision. Chapek did, however, correctly project a Disney+ turnaround by the fourth quarter of 2024, a milestone Iger ultimately claimed credit for when the service finally reached profitability.
What interests me most as D’Amaro steps into the CEO role are the tangible results of his time as chairman of Disney Experiences since May 2020 and what they signal for his leadership style and priorities. You’ve suggested that “the buck stops” with him on parks decisions, even where Jeff Vahle has been the visible face of some controversial moves, and I agree that his record bears close scrutiny. Decisions on his watch include:
1. August 2021– Ending the free FastPass program and introducing Genie+ and paid Lightning Lane access.
2. January 2022 – Ending Disney’s Magical Express airport transportation.
3. June 2024 – Ending Genie+ and rolling out Lightning Lane Multi Pass, effectively increasing prices for line‑skipping services.
4. August 2024 – Announcing Piston Peak National Park in Frontierland as part of the “Beyond Big Thunder Mountain” plans at D23, effectively signaling the end of Rivers of America and Tom Sawyer Island.
5. August 2024 – Announcing a Monsters, Inc.–themed area in Disney’s Hollywood Studios, effectively putting Muppet*Vision 3D on the chopping block.
6. October 2024 – Announcing the Lightning Lane Premier Pass, another escalation in the paid priority‑access ecosystem.
7. Ticket prices – Raising ticket prices by roughly 30–40 percent since he became chairman, with single‑day tickets crossing the 200 dollar threshold. For example, an 8‑day “one park per day” trip for a family of four in late September 2025 reflects about a 55% increase in ticket cost, from approximately $1,931.64 at 2020 pricing to about $2,998.16 dollars at 2025 pricing.
Taken together, these moves show a leader who is highly effective at driving revenue and operating income, but also one who appears comfortable extracting more value from guests while simultaneously shrinking or re‑theming legacy experiences. Under his leadership, Disney Experiences has significantly increased the cost of a Disney vacation while making a mix of guest‑friendly decisions (for example, the promise of a Villains‑themed land) and more opaque, controversial ones. It is not hard to recall the months of speculation over where Villains Land and the Monsters, Inc. area would be located, during which the company declined to level with fans that Rivers of America/Tom Sawyer Island and Muppets 3D were effectively being sacrificed.
Two traits in particular give me pause as D’Amaro moves into the CEO seat:
– He has been relentlessly financially driven in his parks decisions.
– He has been notably silent and non‑transparent about some of the most emotionally charged changes in the parks portfolio.
The question is why a leader whose public persona is built on being visible in the parks and genuinely guest‑focused would repeatedly decline to provide straightforward explanations for decisions that cut to the heart of Disney park identity. When leaders ask guests to pay substantially more while removing or re‑theming beloved attractions, a refusal to speak plainly about the trade‑offs signals a potential blind spot around transparency and trust. That pattern is worth watching very closely in a CEO who will now be responsible for the whole company narrative, not just the parks.
Financially, the parks story is impressive but double‑edged. In 2020, the parks segment swung to large operating losses because of COVID‑era closures and restrictions. By 2024–2025, parks and related experiences were generating roughly $9–$10 billion in annual operating income, an improvement on the order of $10 billion from the depths of the pandemic. Those results helped justify the late‑2023 announcement of about $60 billion in planned parks and experiences investment over 10 years, an expansion program made possible largely by guests paying more for experiences that, in many cases, have not fundamentally changed. Yet even as those guests effectively funded the turnaround and future growth, D’Amaro declined to publicly own or explain several of the least popular changes, which again raises concerns about his instinct for candor.
Strategically, D’Amaro is taking over a company that, under Iger, bet heavily on media and streaming while under‑prioritizing parks as the long‑term growth engine. Chapek largely followed that media‑centric strategy and paid the reputational price. D’Amaro, by contrast, has demonstrated that parks and experiences can be a profit powerhouse—but he achieved that in large part by going deeper into guests’ wallets rather than primarily through organic guest‑experience enhancements. As CEO, the risk is that this same mindset—prioritizing financial optimization over transparency and long‑term goodwill—could be applied more broadly across Disney’s businesses. Shareholder pressure can do that to a CEO.
All of that said, I’m cautiously optimistic about the pairing of D’Amaro with Dana Walden, whose media and creative strengths complement his parks and operations background. It is not an Eisner‑and‑Wells‑style partnership, but it points in a healthier direction for Disney’s balance of operations, creativity, and guest experience than what we have seen in recent years.
My hope is that you will use your platform to keep sustained pressure on D’Amaro around issues that directly affect the average guest rather than the investor deck:
• Park assets and infrastructure that are overdue for serious maintenance and refresh.
• Bringing prices back within reach for typical families (recent “Cool Kids Summer”‑style initiatives are a step, but not a solution).
• Preserving Disney’s legacy, including a deliberate reduction in over‑reliance on IP overlays and branding where it undermines organic storytelling.
• Re‑centering imagineering and narrative quality as the core of the parks portfolio.
• Protecting cast members and elevating frontline guest service as a non‑negotiable priority.
My own visits to Tokyo Disney have underscored that there is still a living, credible template for what Disney can and should be. Pricing there is fair, customer service is consistently excellent, and the holistic guest experience reflects a company identity that is not primarily about maximizing short‑term revenue per guest. It is a reminder that Disney does not have to choose between profitability and principle if leadership is willing to prioritize both.
Within the “Disney bubble,” guests need less time tethered to their phones and more time present with one another. They need to be free from a sense that the financial hook has been set before they ever scan into the park. The standard D’Amaro should be held to as CEO is the original one from Walt: building, maintaining and carefully expanding a happy place where adults and children can experience together some of the wonders of life, relive cherished memories, and create new ones that last.
Thank you for the work you do with the blog and for being a thoughtful steward of the Disney fan community. Please keep guarding the trust, manning the watchtowers, and insisting that Disney remain recognizably Disney—even, and especially, under a new celebrity CEO.
Great comment! Well thought-out and some interesting points raised.
Wow, John! This comment is wonderfully articulated, precise, and thought out. I wholeheartedly agree!
This does give me a lot of hope. Perhaps it hits on a personal level too, as I work in a job serving the public myself and my current leadership team is doing the opposite of D’Amaro. I’m seeing firsthand what happens when the higher-ups don’t talk with their lower-level staff members and customers, or don’t listen. I’m sure there are pros and cons to his leadership, but having him in charge gives me hope on a bigger scale as someone who is feeling particularly jaded right now.
I just tried to book an umbrella for the opening end of May at Typhoon Lagoon, direct with Disney. I was told this was not possible for guest outside USA. I pointed out this was not correct as I booked it last year in advance from the UK. I was told this is Disneys latest policy. It’s sucks. Why would such a company disadvantage others. This policy needs changing in the interests of fairness.
Just looking at the photos, I can’t help thinking that Josh will be Bob Iger 2.0. But I also knew that the Board of Directors is composed of people who would not go any other way than selecting a Bob Iger 2.0 for their new CEO hire.
Most of what you say here makes sense, Tom, and I appreciate the optimism and the reasons for it. But wasn’t D’Amaro behind the decision to kill off Rivers of America and Tom Sawyer Island at the Magic Kingdom?
From what I understand, Jeff Vahle pushed very hard for that. I’ve also heard that he wasn’t the first WDW President to advocate for the removal of RoA, and that it was inevitable for a few reasons. Doesn’t mean it needed to play out how it did, or with Cars as the replacement, but the RoA/TSI as we knew them were goners at some point.
Regardless, the buck stops with D’Amaro on that. He would’ve had final say, and if he felt passionately about it, he could’ve pushed the project in a different direction. It’s not as if WDI wanted to kill it off.
Thanks Tom.
I *have* to assume that leadership was thrown off by just how big the backlash was on this decision. I have to believe some lessons have been learned. Obviously, they expected some backlash or they would have been upfront about it at D23. But the rage went on for months and months (justifiably) and there’s no way they could have imagined the reaction being as bad as it’s been.
From what I understand, your assumption is correct.
Disney’s unofficial policy is “only good news” with exciting announcements, which is something you’ll notice even on a much smaller scale. (Notice that we never get closing dates with substantive announcements? That’s why. They deliberately bifurcate the good vs. bad news, even when it’s obvious that something like a reimagining necessarily entails a closure.)
There’s definitely a lot more to the RoA story than we know. Ditto MuppetVision/RnRC.
Happy with the selection but I hope people are realistic about it. Josh is still the CEO of the company and he has a fiduciary responsibility to the share holders. We also need to be honest about things we didn’t like about Disney over the past X number of years that Josh likely had a hand in (as in not everything bad was all on Bob Chapek). Free fast passes are not coming back, Magical Express is probably not coming back, and overall a trip to Disney World is still going to be really expensive.
100%. And we wrote about that in our original commentary to the announcement (see below). For this, I wanted to focus on good leadership vs. bad leadership, as I think there’s a massive difference and it’s critically important.
From our original commentary:
What we fans want is often a fantasy. When contemplating an idealized candidate, we often do not consider the hard realities of doing the job of Chief Executive Officer in the year 2026. We have a rose-colored glasses on, and daydream of boundless possibilities that are detached from real world constraints, and have little chance of ever becoming reality.
It’s kind of like how celebrities poll incredibly highly for political office based on their likability and people projecting their own beliefs and preferences onto them. But once they have to open their mouths to espouse policy positions, polling inevitably plummets. It has to, because the dream is dead.
When it comes to leading the Walt Disney Company, fans understandably yearn for a return to the days of Roy and Walt or Michael and Frank, and want to see people elevated with the right mix of creativity, leadership, and passion for the product. In another era, that might’ve been how the succession process would’ve played out. For better or worse, the world has changed since the 1950s or even 1990s. Wall Street demands differently, and companies are much more focused on the financials than back in the day.
Some fans want to see foundational changes in the way the Walt Disney Company operates; a complete paradigm shift. They point out that Josh D’Amaro isn’t that different from Bob Iger, and that priorities, philosophy and overall direction will remain unchanged. That’s precisely the point, though.
The same could’ve been said with Bob Chapek, quite honestly, when that change was announced back in February 2020. And yet, there were massive differences in leadership style and execution. Frankly, I’ve seen far too many claims that Chapek, Iger, and D’Amaro are all one-in-the-same. That’s absolute nonsense; revisionist history at best, displaying a startling lack of nuance.
Ultimately, this is to say that the specifics of leadership do matter. We view Josh D’Amaro as a great pick to be the next Disney CEO when operating within the bounds of reality. His background coming up through the theme parks, as opposed to Hollywood or Consumer Products, should be a tremendous asset and big win for fans of Walt Disney World and Disneyland first and foremost.
The team of he and Dana Walden at the top is not going to radically overhaul the Walt Disney Company, but no serious candidate was. What this new leadership arrangement ensures is continuity, and building off the foundation and fixes made in the last few years during the post-Chapek era. Personally, I’m excited–as that involves investing at least $60 billion on theme parks, and those expansion plans being overseen at the top by a parks person.
Glad you had the chance to talk with him post announcement. Eager to see what the future holds and it sounded like an earnest conversation with a small group. As always, thanks for your hard work!
I’d just like to see imagineering get the green light occasionally to build all-original attractions (non IP). That would be a huge win for the hardcore parks fan base.
Stay tuned for our IP article later this week–hopefully tomorrow! 🙂
Aside from D’Amaro’s achievement, it’s pretty incredible that you were invited to interview him directly! Definitely a sign that you produce high-quality analysis and content – Cheers.
Who’s that on the balcony with Tom Bricker?
The Disney co is pretty great the way it is. If he stays out of politics and is middle class friendly I’ll be happy.
Ah yes … “stay out of politics … as long as you support the current administration’s politics”. Don’t fret, I’m sure D’Amaro will do that – just as Iger and all the other media moguls have. To this day I’m astonished by Chapek’s inexplicable decision to speak up for equality and inclusiveness – the one thing he got right.