Top 10 Ride Reimaginings Needed at Disneyland
Disney has big 10-year plans for Disneyland and California Adventure. Marvel land will double in size thanks to Avengers Infinity Defense and Stark Flight Lab, Pandora: World of Avatar will bring a blockbuster boat ride to DCA, and Coco is getting a dark ride that’s described as a spiritual successor to Haunted Mansion and Pirates of the Caribbean.
Expansion to Avengers Campus, Pixar Pier, and a replacement for the languishing Hollywood Backlot is badly needed. All of that is for Disney California Adventure, though. What about Disneyland? What’s on the horizon for Walt Disney’s original magic kingdom in the decade to come?
Our hope is that the plan for Disneyland is TLC, modernizations, and ride reimaginings. And there’s every reason to believe that’s what will happen. Although Disney doesn’t need to invest as much in the castle park to maintain its momentum, Disneyland is in need of updates–especially once the 70th Anniversary celebration ends.
Accordingly, our expectation is that the company pulls a page from the playbook that’s already being utilized at Magic Kingdom. Disneyland will likely embark on a series of ‘singles and doubles’ ride reimaginings to keep locals coming back to the parks in the years to come.
We also know that more ride reimaginings are on the horizon because Disney has said so. While the company has plans to invest $60 billion in Parks & Resorts over the next 10 years, CEO Bob Iger said the spending would be backloaded. Likewise, Parks Chair Josh D’Amaro has made comments that they want to grow the footprints of the parks by building beyond the berm while also improving utilization within them. Both of these things necessarily mean ride reimaginings.
The good news is that there are a dozen-plus attractions (plus the entirety of Tomorrowland) that are at phases in their life cycle when they need to be updated. This could be done faster and cheaper than fully-fledged expansion, too. In a world where time and money are finite and even $60 billion won’t go nearly as far as some fans might think, reimaginings are key.
Anyway, let’s get down to brass tacks and cover the prime candidates for reimaginings at Disneyland, plus a few at DCA just for good measure…
Autopia
Autopia is a Disneyland classic that gives kids the chance to drive through a large track and lush environments. It’s also the best version of a Tomorrowland speedway-style attraction, although that’s a pretty low bar.
The addition of ASIMO and Bird to Autopia a while ago injected Autopia with new life, and really improved the experience. However, it remains a relic from another era, with the biggest downside weighing it down being the overwhelming and almost intoxicating stench.
Disney has already confirmed that Autopia is going electric…at some point in the future. That’s a good start, but it needs to happen sooner rather than later, and not be the only change made to this aging attraction. Honestly, I wouldn’t be upset if the track were shortened to free up space for Tomorrowland and/or Fantasyland expansion.
Buzz Lightyear’s Astro Blasters
My unpopular opinion is that Buzz Lightyear’s Astro Blasters is the best shooter ride at Disneyland. It uses physical show scenes to make it engaging for guests who want to enjoy the attraction passively. Some of the staging, props, and Audio Animatronics are really cool. The interactivity is fun, and I personally prefer gamified attractions like this; ones that are enjoyable whether you play or not, as it adds multigenerational appeal.
The reason it makes the list is because, like all tech-heavy attractions, there are ways that Buzz Lightyear’s Astro Blasters could stand to be modernized. The on-ride photo, for example, looks like it was shot with a webcam on a Gateway 2000. The blasters, targets, and ride vehicles would likewise benefit from newer tech.
The good news is that this is currently happening at Walt Disney World! Imagineers are taking the bones of that Buzz Lightyear blaster ride and modernizing the attraction with improved gameplay, new blasters, and a variety of enhancements including a new show scene and Audio Animatronics character. Do the same thing at Disneyland!
The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh
The Walt Disney Company has squandered the potential of Winnie the Pooh, sidelining he and his posse’s potential with a rather antiquated and middling dark ride. It is rudimentary and dated (despite not being that old), failing to showcase the heart and charm of these beloved characters.
An attraction based on Winnie the Pooh should be timeless, filled with childlike wonder, and more popular than Peter Pan’s Flight. We know a Pooh-centric attraction can reach these heights because there is an older one that is exactly all of these things…but it’s at Tokyo Disneyland.
Honestly, though, maybe it’s time for Disneyland to decide whether this should be a Winnie the Pooh ride at all. Tiana’s Bayou Adventure replaced Splash Mountain, the Country Bears took up residence in the adjacent restaurant, and Critter Country became Bayou Country. Maybe it’s time for a full circle moment, with the Country Bears evicting Pooh’s Posse.
Finding Nemo Submarine Voyage
Finding Nemo Submarine Voyage takes guests aboard actual submarines to, as the name suggests, go find Nemo. It’s a relatively long attraction with awesome sets and detail. The undersea substance of the attraction is arguably underrated.
However, the wait times can be long because the ride has low capacity, the queue is incredibly boring and entirely outdoors, and the subs themselves are cramped and often smell of BO. We love the idea of Finding Nemo Submarine Voyage, but the actual experience is a bit of a chore and could use some updates.
As for what those updates should be, I’m unsure. Whenever there are rumors about the future of Finding Nemo Submarine Voyage, they’re usually that it has no future. It’s honestly a small miracle that the ride was brought back and still exists.
I certainly don’t want to lose this lagoon, and would love to see Imagineering invest in updates as “insurance” that the submarines are around for at least another decade. Kind of like we’re seeing with Carousel of Progress at Magic Kingdom. Maybe Imagineering could work its magic again, and reimagine this into 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, kind of like they did with the Adventureland Treehouse a few years ago!
Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride
This is another suggestion that I’m somewhat reluctant to make, as Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride is very obviously an attraction that would never be built today. On what other Disney attraction do you visit a bar and drive recklessly, get found guilty in a court of law, die in a truck accident, and go to hell?!
Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride is arguably something special that hits with today’s audiences because of its irreverence and unexpected surprises, rather than in spite of that. If this attraction were to be fully overhauled, it would almost certainly have some of its personality and charm removed. I’m not proposing that.
What I am advocating for is the kind of effects enhancements that were done throughout Fantasyland around the time of the Diamond Celebration. Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride should not have a single show scene replaced. But it should get some new tech and effects. Who doesn’t want their vacation’s detour to hell to be more wow-inducing?!
Pinocchio’s Daring Journey
It’s pretty much the same story here. All of the other Fantasyland dark rides–Peter Pan’s Flight, Alice in Wonderland, Snow White’s Enchanted Wish–have received refreshes.
Those have yielded tremendous results, breathing new life into the classics. The same could and should happen with Pinocchio’s Daring Journey, which is the least popular of these attractions. Thankfully, we don’t need to worry about Disney trying to tie it into the live action remake.
Matterhorn
In theory, the Matterhorn is perfect. A great track layout, stunning views, and cool show scenes punctuated by brief yeti encounters. Even though it’s lower tech, the Matterhorn was Expedition Everest decades before the latter was even conceived.
I’m sometimes harsh on the Matterhorn because it’s physically punishing. It’s one of the most painful attractions that I enjoy, but I do enjoy it. I also appreciate the enhancements made back around the Diamond Celebration and feel that they rounded out the ride’s story (much in the same way I’d like to see Grizzly River Run changed).
With all of that said, it does seem likely that the Matterhorn will receive the Space Mountain or Big Thunder Mountain Railroad treatment at some point in the next decade. Between pieces falling off the facade and the roughness of the ride, it’s inevitable. When that occurs, my hope is that the ride is loving rebuilt in a way that honors its history, restores and further enhances the attraction.
The Little Mermaid ~ Ariel’s Undersea Adventure
This is one of the newest Fantasyland-style dark rides, built from the ground up with 21st century technology. It debuted as part of the DCA overhaul, and received a mixed reaction among fans. The same was likely true internally, as Imagineering spent over a year tweaking the ride, changing lighting, props, and Ariel’s hair.
My seemingly unpopular opinion is that the Little Mermaid dark ride is underrated. It has a couple of marquee moments, spectacular setpieces, and awe-inspiring Audio Animatronics. But I can also admit that it’s not the most immersive attraction and the “book report” style drags it down.
The ride narrative obviously is not going to change, but the ride could use a few added Audio Animatronics and other effects to make those spectacular setpieces more engaging. A lot of the experience feels overly passive, and doesn’t make guests active participants in the middle of the action as well as it could.
Goofy’s Sky School
This ride was already reimagined once, going from Mulholland Madness to Goofy’s Sky School as part of the DCA overhaul ~15 years ago. At the time, the understanding was that the overlay was a band aid–a placemaking fix before Imagineering had the time and resources to fully address the ride in a decade or so.
With the Coco boat ride now confirmed as being built over by Incredicoaster on Pixar Pier and not on this side of Paradise Gardens Park, we can’t help but wonder what the long term plan is for Goofy’s Sky School. The placemaking here is a marked improvement over Mulholland Madness, but this ride still needs something more.
What it needs is far less clear. A simple reimagining that swaps out the thematic window-dressing doesn’t fix the underlying uncomfortableness and ordinariness of the wild mouse coaster. Conversely, an outright replacement seems unlikely given the limited footprint. I’m sure Imagineers can work their magic and find a solution, because this ride is already past its shelf life. (And given that they’re squeezing Coco into a similarly-small parcel!)
Grizzly River Run
Hear me out on this one. Yes, Grizzly Peak is the one land Imagineering got right in 2001, and the original area has only improved over time. According to the land’s original backstory, it was developed as a mine in the 1800s after a chance discovery of gold. The mine was later abandoned and the land sold to the government in the 1950s.
In the years since, Imagineering has added placemaking details that make Grizzly Peak look more like one of California’s beautiful National Parks. This includes Grizzly River Run, which Disney scrubbed of its extreme sports thematic layer. In its place, the rustic elements have been enhanced.
Most recently, a carved Big Al has been added outside of Grizzly River Run, adding to the attraction’s growing collection of big bear figures. This is probably coincidental, but it is worth pointing out that ~15 years ago, there were rumors that further show scene enhancements to Grizzly River River were part of the DCA overhaul’s second phase.
I recall seeing concept art at the time that showed Country Bear Audio Animatronics, but the specifics are hazy. It’s unclear whether that was a rejected pitch or a planned reimagining that was subsequently shelved. Regardless, now is the time to revive the idea. The Country Bears are enjoying a revival, and there’s plenty of bare space that could be enhanced by bears.
Grizzly River Run is a lovely scenic ride, but it could be a great one with just a little more storytelling and placemaking, along with a couple of marquee show scenes. The template for exactly this exists with Big Grizzly Mountain Runaway Mine Cars at Hong Kong Disneyland.
That excellent roller coaster is elevated tremendously by just a couple of show scenes and scattering of props. The same could be done by injecting the Country Bears into Grizzly River Run. Or any bears, for that matter. Heck, have a giant bear looming over the climactic drop, like Q’aráq in Roaring Rapids!
Planning a Southern California vacation? For park admission deals, read Tips for Saving Money on Disneyland Tickets. Learn about on-site and off-site hotels in our Anaheim Hotel Reviews & Rankings. For where to eat, check out our Disneyland Restaurant Reviews. For unique ideas of things that’ll improve your trip, check out What to Pack for Disney. For comprehensive advice, consult our Disneyland Vacation Planning Guide. Finally, for guides beyond Disney, check out our Southern California Itineraries for day trips to Los Angeles, Laguna Beach, and many other SoCal cities!
YOUR THOUGHTS
Do any attractions at Disneyland and DCA strike you as being prime candidates for ride reimaginings? Anything you think our list “snubbed” that should be slated for replacement or at least an update? Do you agree or disagree with our choices? Any questions we can help you answer? Hearing your feedback–even when you disagree with us–is both interesting to us and helpful to other readers, so please share your thoughts below in the comments!













I agree with Astro blasters when we went this past January half the stuff didn’t work
I’m curious about what will happen with all of Disney’s recent big earners at the box office. Moana 2, Inside Out 2, Lilo and Stitch, now Zootopia 2. I feel like they must be chomping at bit to get those IPs in the parks more and wonder if / where they’re going to show up.
Nic said: “I’m curious about what will happen with all of Disney’s recent big earners at the box office.”
Here’s my take on this question–all of this according to my perceptions and opinions: For at least the past 60 years, Disneyland has been very slow to open attractions based on hit IP’s. I believe the problem has been, primarily, the length of the attraction development cycle. By the time an IP becomes a hit, then the bluesky ideation and planning phase is done, then the funding is acquired, then the designs are completed, and demolition and construction happen, it can take 5 to 10 times as long as it took to plan, fund, and build the original park. Until may be 10 years ago, home video, DVD, and Blueray releases could be timed to coincide with a years-too-late ride opening, but even that became impossible when the home versions (and streaming versions) were released the following Christmas and now the next month. On top of that, public expectations were low.
However: Universal’s parks have been eating Disney’s lunch on the attraction development cycle. I believe Universal is now planning, funding, and designing attractions prior to movie release. So, all they have to do is pull the trigger in the first weekend of the film’s top box office performance. They announce, then finish construction. If the movie bombs or is only a mediocre hit, they scrap the plans.
And: I’m sure Disney has noticed they’re being beaten there. Guest, voting with their dollars and attendance, have expressed this. So, their incentive to cut down the development time ramps up every year and I believe they may soon start the same process. They’ve already started prefabricating and testing 80% of the attraction before announcing, demolishing, and building.
Quick answer: I don’t think we’ll see any attractions based on past hit IP’s for a while (with the exception of Zootopia, which I’ll discuss in a moment). At the same time, we could start getting announcements in early 2026 about attractions based on 2025 hit IP’s, with those attractions opening in late 2026 or 2027. Shanghai opened Zootopia 2 updates the same month the movie was released, shockingly. And the same month, Better Zoogether in DAK opened with Zootopia 2 elements in it. I think opening new Disney Park IP-based attractions the same year as the original film is only months to a couple of years away.
Restore the tracks and bring back the Peoplemover.
This. This is all they need to do to make me happy.
Agreed! Bring back to PeopleMover, please!
I feel like the discomfort of the Matterhorn is part of its charm…but I’ve only been on it once.
My biggest issue with the Submarine Voyage is the audio. Not sure if it was the speakers or the acoustics, but I could barely hear any of it.
I’d really like to see them “reimagine” the Astro Orbiter back up on top of the Peoplemover station where it belongs. The contraption that’s up there now is just ugly.
The Matterhorn should be at the top of the list. I was on it in September, and it was painful. I enjoyed it to a point. I even had trouble getting out of the car when my sneaker got stuck since the cars are so narrow. I wasn’t sure if it was just me but then my 40-year-old son also came off the ride feeling he had been knocked around a bit. We both had to take a break after to give our bodies a rest. The golden oldie is a gem that needs to be brought into the 21st century.
Coming soon: Disney’s Matterhorn! sponsored by Haleon, makers of Advil.
I am 71 years old. I have seen many changes over many trips to Disneyland. Why update the Submarine Ride, Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride, Matterhorn and Pinocchio’s Daring Journey when the Fantasyland Autopia and the Fantasyland Motorboat Ride have not been running in decades! I haven’t seen them open and running since I was a girl. Talk about a waste of space. The building that used to house the Carousel of Progress/America Sings! is now a boring walk-through exhibit about technology. If I want to see that kind of stuff, I would rather go to a Science Museum.
The Fantasyland/Junior/Midget Autopia area has been incorporated into the Tomorrowland Autopia area, extending the track. That’s not to say I’m happy-talking the situation. Just to say that I believe Disney believes they have sacrificed a redundant attraction to plus its twin. Your mileage may vary, motorists.
I believe they need a new audio track for the narrator’s in the Tiki Room. Especially José. The dialog problematic. Otherwise, they should leave the attraction as is.
I’m curious to know what causes you to consider the dialog problematic. Wally Boag’s stereotyped delivery? Outdated dad jokes?
My perception is that both of those things are part of the charm and nostalgia for frequent Disneyland guests. Maybe a Magic Kingdom update would be appropriate, since that Tiki Room seems to be attended more often by first-timers, and its nostalgia/tradition is 7 years shorter. And people who miss the original dialog can always visit Anaheim. On top of that, everything is offensive to people who are easily offended.
I had a similar opinion about Splash Mountain: It wasn’t offensive or in poor taste or encouraging of violence any more than any other story that includes conflict–which turns out to be all stories. The characters were from a movie that no longer resonates as well with audiences–a movie not even available in America for at least 2 generations–a movie championed by celebrities who had been considered opponents (notably: Whoopi Goldberg). It didn’t “need” to be updated…but they did a decent job with the update.
When you go on the Fantasyland dark rides back to back, it really calls out the enhancements…and the lack of enhancement….for their respective rides. Even going on Peter Pan at MK last summer, it was glaring how dark it was compared to DLR’s updated version. I don’t want to lose going to hell on Mr. Toads, but would love a more vibrant wild ride!
I have a love/hate relationship with the Matterhorn. The effects are better than I experienced during my childhood and it is such an iconic landmark- no other park has a duplicate! But it hurts. A lot. When I go on there is a lot mental preparation and bracing myself throughout the ride. Yet, I will go on it as long as it is around and my body will allow.
And seeing Tomorrowland at DLR just hurts. What was…what can still be. MK’s Tomorrowland is more kinetically alive and I miss that about “my” DLR Tomorrowland.
And we can all agree that Goofy’s Sky Coaster just need to be 86’d. I go on it because it’s there. And it is bad, not in the Run DMC’s “not bad meaning bad, but bad meaning good” way- it just sucks.
1) Star Tours
Small screen, dubious 3-D. Boring loading process. Cabins are over-sized. Not really immersive or thrilling by any measure. The only draw is the Star Wars easter eggs and the only Star Wars attraction on property with an actual sense of humor.
Just a really, really dated attraction, the technology of which has aged even more poorly than rides double its age (like Autopia), compounded by the fact that Smuggler’s Run is the same conceptual experience (motion simulator) that puts the everything but the onscreen media to shame. To me, put the onscreen media of Star Tours into Smuggler’s Run, and you’ve successfully improved the latter attraction enough to take out the former.
My starting point would be to reimagine the empty and abandoned: the People Mover track, the old Carousel building, the old Starcade Arcade, and the former Motor Boat lagoon (all coincidentally within what was once loosely considered Tomorrowland. I would hope that would lead to less crowding, shorter lines, a more varied experience, more fun, and a better overall experience.
I largely agree with this list.
Although there have been pieces falling off the Matterhorn, it’s hard to tell if it genuinely needs a complete rebuild or not. I know the entire thing was replaced in phases throughout the nineties, though the Matterhorn is probably inherently something that will need a bit more TLC throughout its life simply because of how it was built.
Speaking of, while I understand the desire to make it smoother, the reality is that it’s a 1959 Arrow coaster, and there’s only so much that can be done to make it smoother without altering its layout. I suppose they could try altering the sleds again, but I’m not really sure what else they could do that would really help long term. I’d also be bereft if I didn’t mention, as a coaster dork, that Matterhorn is typically only considered to be genuinely rough in Disney-only circles. When other non-Disney/non-Universal coasters are taken into account, Matterhorn isn’t anywhere near the conversation of roughest rides.
Sky School just needs to go. There isn’t a way to Disneyfy it; its current state is a band-aid when it should have been discarded entirely.
My problem with the Little Mermaid is that it’s too literal until it isn’t. It’s the prime example of giving people what they think they want. You have seemingly every single performer from Under the Sea there on the ride, which sounds great-except they’re all making exactly one very repetitive motion. We spend seemingly the length of the entire song in that room, yet we yada yada the film’s actual climax. It’s not weird or interesting enough to be worth riding if you’re in the mood for anything other than a book report version of the movie.
Related to the Autopia potentially changing, I feel like the Monorail could use more love. I’m not sure what I would do, precisely, but it is routinely a five minute wait and seems to have more love as an icon than as an attraction or genuine transportation.
The last time I rode Pinocchio, which was already my least favorite Fantasyland attraction at that point, my pants split as I lowered myself into the vehicle. I took it as a sign from above and have avoided the ride ever since (also, how does the newest of the Fantasyland dark rides have the least roomy/comfortable cars? Make it make sense).
I get the impression that TSI is not in the best state and could use some love, but since I haven’t actually been over there since pre-Covid, I’m probably not the most reliable source in that area.