Disney Lakeshore Lodge Under Construction
Disney Lakeshore Lodge (formerly Reflections) is a nature-inspired resort being built on the former River Country water park on Bay Lake. Located between Wilderness Lodge and Fort Wilderness at Walt Disney World, it’ll feature both hotel rooms and Disney Vacation Club villas.
Originally announced in October 2018, this Lakeside/Lakeshore Lodge will “be a celebration of Walt Disney’s lifelong love and respect for nature” with more than 900 hotel rooms and Disney Vacation Club villas. Reflections resort was slated to be the 16th Disney Vacation Club property, part of a significant expansion on the hotel side of Walt Disney World. It’ll now be the 19th DVC resort, and part of a new wave of significant expansion.
Disney Lakeshore Lodge is billed by the company as one of the “most unique resorts ever built” at Walt Disney World. Previously released concept art showcases a range of novel accommodations, including both treehouse suites and waterfront A-frame cabins. There is also expected to be a waterfront restaurant located “along the bayou of Bay Lake.”
Work quietly resumed on this project 18 months ago, and has moved at a really fast pace. The base structures have now been topped off at their maximum heights, and work is underway inside the buildings and around the grounds. In the photos below, you can see the pool, waterfront restaurant, boat dock, and outlying A-frame cabins all taking shape.
Active construction is visible from Bay Lake, Wilderness Lodge, and even the Settlement area of Fort Wilderness. It’s interesting to watch, even if you’re not necessarily excited about the finished product. There’s zero construction impact on guest rooms/campsites at Wilderness Lodge or Fort Wilderness, but it’s very visible from the Settlement of the latter.
Below is a look at new aerial photos from Spring 2026 showcasing the latest progress on Disney’s Lakeshore Lodge, which continues to move at an incredibly fast pace ahead of its planned 2027 opening. As always, all aerial photos are courtesy of friend of the site bioreconstruct, who graciously provided the construction photos here…
Only a trio of new photos this month, but they reveal progress on several things:
- Bus stop shelters
- Roofing
- Boat dock
- A-frame cabins
- Waterfront restaurant
- Lazy river & feature pool
There’s still no movement on the treehouse villas originally intended for the Fort Wilderness side. It’s possible where those will be built is being used as a staging site, or that they’ve been cancelled.
If you want to see how much progress has been made in the last month, here are February photos:
Disney Lakeshore Lodge is going to be a 10-story resort with 900 rooms arranged in a “W” layout of its wings, with two main courtyards. What you see above is more or less the final footprint of the resort, which is very large. You’d have to go back to Art of Animation or Animal Kingdom Lodge for the last resort of this size.
By contrast, Wilderness Lodge has has a 7-story main building and 728 rooms in total. The largest resort in the Magic Kingdom area is currently Grand Floridian; it’s just over 1,000 rooms between the hotel and DVC wings. Lakeshore Lodge will be fairly close in size to the main resort–with more inventory than the Poly or Contemporary.
Relative to recent resorts, Disney’s Riviera Resort is 9-stories tall but with only 300 rooms. This will be one story taller and with a significantly larger footprint. It’s not necessarily triple the size of the Riviera, but it’s the largest new resort at Walt Disney World in a long time–with more room inventory than Riviera and Island Tower combined.
Walt Disney World hasn’t said much officially about Disney Lakeshore Lodge in the year-plus since announcing it was back in development. However, we know that the footprint is unchanged from the previous permits and site plans for Reflections.
Back at the 2019 D23 Expo, Parks Chairman Bob Chapek announced this restaurant would be “along the bayou of Bay Lake” have a Princess and the Frog theme. However, that was before Tiana’s Bayou Adventure and more additions of Princess and the Frog at Port Orleans, so another IP might be chosen.
During that D23, Disney also announced that there would be both A-frame cabins and elevated treehouses. As of Spring 2026, standalone unit construction consists entirely of the A-frames. However, there should be a second row of structures on the side closer to Clementine Beach (see below), and that should consist of 5 treehouses if Disney is recycling the Reflections plans completely.
Disney Lakeshore Lodge is projected to open in 2027. Given the current pace of the project, our expectation is that it opens in the first half of 2027. Quite honestly, it wouldn’t surprise us in the least if Disney moved this up to late 2026.
It probably depends on when it’s most strategically-advantageous to launch a new DVC resort from a sales perspective, so perhaps Island Tower sales are more outcome-determinative than construction progress.
Disney is utilizing the same efficient construction method for Lakeshore Lodge that likewise enabled Island Tower at Disney’s Polynesian Resort to be built expeditiously. Note that there are multiple connected buildings that form the main resort, and not all have been equally far along throughout the project.
Although Disney hasn’t said much about Lakeshore Lodge, the site plans and aerial photo confirm a lot. Both indicate that there will be a lazy river and feature pool, along with a waterfront restaurant in the courtyard closer to Fort Wilderness. The lower courtyard will hold the quiet pool and boat dock.
The Disney Lakeshore Lodge towers will, quite literally, tower over Pioneer Hall. For reference, Disney Lakeshore Lodge is much closer to Pioneer Hall than Gran Destino is to the (old) main lobby of Coronado Springs or even Island Tower is to the existing longhouses at the Polynesian.
No photos do this justice. Even after seeing construction plans illustrating just how close the two are, I was still taken aback when seeing this construction in person. It is right there, and the only way to fully convey that is by standing in the Settlement and seeing the tower taking shape.
Even though we can see it taking shape in plain view and know a lot thanks to permits and other public filings, the only thing Walt Disney World has revealed in the last year-plus is this: “The proposed Disney Lakeshore Lodge will be located within the same footprint of the previously announced Reflections – A Disney Lakeside Lodge resort. Additional information will be released at a later time.”
That’s it. Walt Disney World has not shared new concept art, how Disney Lakeshore Lodge will differ from Reflections, or anything else. Again, Disney Lakeshore Lodge will be a 10-story mixed use property with a hotel wing and DVC wing, plus waterfront treehouses and A-frame cabins.
Disney Lakeshore Lodge will also offer a main feature pool and a leisure pool, with the former being the flagship amenity at the resort. The highlight of Disney Lakeshore Lodge’s pool complex will be a lazy river, making it only the third Walt Disney World hotel to offer one, joining the iconic Stormalong Bay at the Yacht & Beach Club Resorts.
Disney Lakeshore Lodge’s feature pool will also include a zero-entry design for easy access, water slides, and a splash pad for the children’s play area. Positioned near the lake and nestled behind the main hotel building, the pool area is expected to offer scenic waterfront views of Bay Lake.
Every new resort needs a marquee offering–a selling point. Island Tower has the Polynesian and monorail, Riviera Resort has the Skyliner. Disney Lakeshore Lodge will have an impressive pool. It’s not only a logical feature, but a great nod to the River Country water park (see below) that it replaces. I’m sure there will be many River Country nods and easter eggs for longtime Walt Disney World fans in the pool complex.
While the structures and layout are unlikely to differ from the previous plans, don’t be surprised if there are material changes to the appearance of Disney Lakeshore Lodge versus Reflections.
This is purely speculative, but with so much passage of time, different leadership both at Imagineering and Parks & Resorts, and shifting trends in hotel design, it seems inevitable that what we first saw in 2018 will change to some degree by the time it opens almost a decade later. Basically, anything aesthetic is likely to change, whereas the original site plans seem to be set in stone.
Our hope is that the interior is made to look more interesting, timeless, and ‘lodgy.’ What was previously shown is dated already, and looked fairly unambitious. But there’s no reason to believe the bigger picture plans for the exterior, layout, etc. have changed.
There’s another misconception among fans that the original Reflections plans were simply recycled for the Island Tower at the Polynesian. That is categorically false. I know they’re both bland and boring towers that appear relatively interchangeable, but they are distinct.
I’ll admit that warming to Disney Lakeshore Lodge, and suspect many skeptics will do the same once this pool complex and lazy river are officially announced. Part of this is that Disney already did site-prep, cleared tons of trees, and dumped millions of dollars into developing this parcel. It’s inevitable that they’d build on this land at some point down the road, and that it would be a tower. Might as well happen sooner rather than later so we can enjoy the offering.
We love both Wilderness Lodge and Fort Wilderness, and now have a daughter who will be the perfect age for Walt Disney World–and enjoying these resorts–by the time Disney Lakeshore Lodge opens in 2027. I’m also really looking forward to getting the walking path connecting the resorts back.
Being able to stay at Wilderness Lodge or Fort Wilderness and having access to all three will be nice, as will those early morning and sunset strolls. Maybe Lakeshore Lodge will have a stacked restaurants and amenities slate (like Riviera!), and we’ll be able to stay at the comparatively inexpensive Cabins at Fort Wilderness while enjoying a robust restaurant lineup. Even if the building is ugly and out-of-place amidst the frontier, and it certainly is, it also presents undeniable practical upsides and should boast formidable features.
In the intervening years since Disney Lakeshore Lodge was mothballed, a trio of new Disney Vacation Club projects in the Magic Kingdom resort area has come to life. This includes the new resort studios at Grand Floridian, which was a room conversion project. There’s also the Island Tower at Disney’s Polynesian Village Resort; as the name suggests, that’s a brand-new tower, built between the Poly and Grand Floridian.
Finally, there’s the Cabins at Disney’s Fort Wilderness Resort – A Disney Vacation Club Resort (pictured below). They’ve proven controversial among Disney fans, but we love the new DVC Cabins at Fort Wilderness. The biggest question mark–does Disney Lakeshore Lodge help or hinder sales of the Cabins at Fort Wilderness? The answer probably depends upon how Disney treats them. If they’re part of the same trust/condo association, sales of the Cabins at Fort Wilderness will improve.
The other reason it’s worth drawing attention to these projects is because there are a lot of them. There’s also the Villas at Disneyland Hotel, Disney’s Riviera Resort, and Aulani in Hawaii. This is all significant because it means a ton of points being sold simultaneously, and numerous resorts competing with one another for the attention of buyers.
All of these new Disney Vacation Club resorts still in active sales explains why Walt Disney World hasn’t said much about Disney Lakeshore Lodge. They don’t want to take attention away from those, causing people to wait and see what happens with Lakeshore Lodge before buying DVC.
The only thing Disney has done is buried an announcement in a newsletter–no press release, concept art, or any fanfare. And the only reason they did that because speculation was rampant based on a multitude of construction permits, appearance of cranes on-site, and the resort starting to go vertical. It was an open secret, and would’ve been silly for Disney to pretend otherwise.
Radio silence isn’t Disney’s normal MO when it comes to new construction. If anything, they typically overshare and try too hard to generate hype. So this is very much a divergence from the norm. However, it’s very consistent with past precedent when it comes to Disney Vacation Club. I still remember when Bay Lake Tower was going vertical and plainly visible from the monorail…and DVC sales reps pretended it didn’t exist.
Nevertheless, our expectation is that Walt Disney World starts sharing more about Disney Lakeshore Lodge in 2026. With an opening likely in the first half of 2027, it’s likely that sales will start around mid-2026. This means that DVC should really start pulling back the curtain on Lakeshore Lodge in Spring 2026, generating excitement and buzz.
In the last few years, Disney Vacation Club hasn’t been afraid to have several properties for sale simultaneously. That didn’t used to be the case. Now, DVC is fine with a larger number of properties being available for sale, with the thought process that more variety equals greater consumer choice and a higher likelihood of selling memberships. (After all, they’re all going to sell out eventually…well, maybe minus Aulani and the Cabins at Fort Wilderness!)
Having more unsold DVC inventory at Walt Disney World isn’t particularly concerning because it serves as hotel inventory in the meantime that can be booked out at higher cash rates. There’s still a lot of Riviera and Island Tower at the Poly that haven’t been declared, and those rooms fetch $600+ per night on the hotel side.
Turning to my original commentary, I love Wilderness Lodge and Fort Wilderness. I’m a Disney Vacation Club member. In theory, Disney Lakeshore Lodge seems perfectly tailored to some of my favorite things about Walt Disney World. I want to love the idea of the River Country parcel finally being redeveloped, instead of rotting in plain sight. I’m truly hopeful for the best here.
Unfortunately, like pretty much every Fort Wilderness fan, I’m very apprehensive about this Disney Vacation Club project (well, mixed-use, but presumably mostly DVC). Part of what makes Fort Wilderness special is that it’s been relatively undisturbed by time, and is one of the last bastions of “Vacation Kingdom of the World” era of WDW.
It’s almost remarkable how different Fort Wilderness feels from the rest of Walt Disney World—even its neighbor, Wilderness Lodge. It’s almost as if Walt Disney World leadership has forgotten about Fort Wilderness, and it hasn’t seen the same fiscal mandates, changes in emphasis, or character as every other resort over the last couple decades. In large part, it’s been doing its thing, more or less unchanged since the 1990s.
There’s a very legitimate concern, especially after seeing how the Copper Creek and Boulder Ridge projects at Wilderness Lodge unfolded, that any expansion at or around Fort Wilderness will destroy the primitive and secluded characteristics of the campground that give it so much appeal. After all, this is a campground with wilderness right in the name–the environment is the heart and soul of Fort Wilderness.
The development of Disney Lakeshore Lodge doesn’t necessarily have to destroy the tranquil and secluded atmosphere of Fort Wilderness, but that seems like a very distinct possibility. Disney’s recent approach to developing hotels adjacent to existing resorts doesn’t inspire much confidence, and if there’s a ham-fisted approach when clearing land or an overzealous mentality when it comes to the size or proximity of the resort to the campground, it will be incredibly detrimental to Fort Wilderness.
As for the design, only a couple pieces of concept art have been released, and they’re nothing special. I don’t want to rush to judgment here, as I think there is potential for this to end up being interesting once more is released, but right now it looks like a fairly generic hotel with some modern rustic flourishes.
On the plus side, Wimberly Allison Tong & Goo (WATG) is the lead designer for Disney Lakeshore Lodge, and they have a very good track record with Disney. They designed the original Grand Floridian Resort & Spa, along with Disney hotels in Tokyo, Paris, and Hong Kong.
If this were a decade or two ago, I might be more deferential to Disney with regard to this concept art. However, the last several years have shown that Walt Disney World is very hit or miss with resort development and redesigns, skewing towards boring designs. It seems the approach is to choose the most middle-of-the-road offerings as possible so as to not alienate those with bland tastes.
When you compare Walt Disney World resorts built before the mid-1990s to ones built or redesigned in the last few years, there’s generally a clear division. Contemporary projects are often interchangeable with real world Holiday Inns or other mid-tier chained brand hotels.
Look at the difference between BoardWalk Inn or Beach Club and the new Gran Destino Tower at Coronado or Disney’s Riviera Resort. Don’t get me wrong–I like both for the amenities they offer, luxuriousness, and room designs. However, the exteriors of both leave a lot to be desired, and neither are exactly exemplars of themed design. (Admittedly, they have both grown on me a lot, but I still wish they were more ornate or unique.)
One explanation is that Disney wants to make things as crowd-pleasing as possible so as to not alienate any potential customers. The thing about this approach is that when you try to appeal to everyone, you end up appealing to no one.
Another explanation is that Imagineering’s talents are spread too thin. I know some readers might only follow the projects at Walt Disney World, but every single property around the world has huge projects in various stages of development or construction.
In the past when less was occurring simultaneously, maybe some top-tier Imagineering talent who “got” Disney’s distinct approach to hotels worked on a resort project. Now? Maybe they’re mostly designers who view working for WDI as “just another job” no different than Best Western or IHG.
Along those same lines, with so many projects in development, it’s entirely possible–if not probable–that leadership in the Parks & Resorts division is trying to trim the budget from each one, cutting aspects or details viewed as superfluous.
The problem is that those leaders are not creatives, and their experience is often in consumer products or other division of the company. They have absolutely no insight into what details are actually superfluous, and what are necessary for reinforcing theme or creating a sense of immersion.
Ultimately, more concept art could be released that’s really good. The project could employ a deft hand when developing around Fort Wilderness in a way that doesn’t damage that landscape. (Disney, just think of how much you could pat yourselves on the back by utilizing eco-friendly and sustainable construction practices–it’d be worth it in the PR alone!) It could end up being really good–a true tribute to both Walt Disney’s love of nature, but the spirit of River Country, which was never coming back anyway.
I’m cautiously optimistic that’s what could end up happening, but I think it’s equally likely that we’ll get a generically modern and vaguely rustic design. It’s also more likely that instead of eco-friendly construction that preserves the natural beauty and wilderness of the area, we get excessive tree clearing for the construction, and an end product akin to Copper Creek and Boulder Ridge in terms of wide walkways and bare grounds.
Planning a Walt Disney World trip? Learn about hotels on our Walt Disney World Hotels Reviews page. For where to eat, read our Walt Disney World Restaurant Reviews. To save money on tickets or determine which type to buy, read our Tips for Saving Money on Walt Disney World Tickets post. Our What to Pack for Disney Trips post takes a unique look at clever items to take. For what to do and when to do it, our Walt Disney World Ride Guides will help. For comprehensive advice, the best place to start is our Walt Disney World Trip Planning Guide for everything you need to know!
YOUR THOUGHTS
Are you optimistic or pessimistic about Disney Lakeshore Lodge? What do you think of the potential of this and other new hotels at Walt Disney World? Any other questions or comments? Hearing your feedback is part of the fun, so please share your thoughts below in the comments!
Sorry to hear of this, I’m sure there are plenty of other places to build another hotel. I would rather see them add more sites and a pool to Fort wilderness camp ground. Yes the camp ground is not a big money making hotel, but it does unique and sometimes it’s not always just about the money.
I’m a little conflicted here. These days, visiting Disney resorts is the thing I like most about WDW (indeed, it’s the thing that keeps me going to Florida rather than taking another trip to Tokyo..!). And I say that as someone who is not a DVC member and has never stayed on-site (except S&D and Bonnet Creek). So each new resort gives me a new bit of “Disney” to explore.
But resorts are nothing without a feeling of relative seclusion, walking trails and nice views. And though free space within WDW is finite, the demand to buy more (new) timeshares directly from Disney appears insatiable. Things won’t improve until the first DVC contracts start expiring. So I’m not really sure what the endgame is for WDW when they run out of space for new timeshares.
My prediction is that the definition of “on property” will become whatever Disney says it is (places outside the existing WDW area with “magical” buses taking you into Disney), and depressingly that FW won’t exist at all in 20 years. The land it occupies is just too prime and not enough people value the isolation and solitude of nature. (To some extent, I can’t blame Disney – they aren’t a public service or a national park – but it’s still disappointing).
While I’ve thought there was room for a moderately sized resort between the Wilderness Lodge and Fort Wilderness, I’m afraid that some of these proposals look like they’re going to make this new resort adjoining or even sharing facilities with one or both resorts. That is a bad idea.
So sad to see these monstrosities being built that lack any real thoughtful theming. The high rise hotels remind me of Myrtle Beach not Disney. Such an eye sore. Hopefully the new one by the Wilderness Lodge will at least be hidden with trees.
You know what would be an amazing resort? A Japanese themed resort surrounded with beautiful Japanese gardens. Just saying. This one looks lame from the concept art.
Nice post, Tom. There isn’t much I can add without lacing into expletives about the pigs who run the company today and what they have done — and are doing — to WDW (and DL as well with the tumor that is Star Wars Land). … They have destroyed the WL (I don’t care how faux upscale the cabins on the lake are. They never should have been built.) and now they will take care of that one last piece of my childhood. WDW will simply be a giant timeshare, hotel and McMansion development with overrated (vastly) theme parks as ancillary parts of the business. And fans will eat it up. Because most fans today are like most Americans, dumb as dirt. If the Bobs, Chappie and the Weatherman, want them to like something, they will. I am so beyond disgusted with the whole deal. And really … let’s not give them the benefit of the doubt. Let’s look at the last 15 years (or more) and be realistic about how they operate their business — like they are closing tomorrow. But the addicts will keep showing up. Hell, I do … wonder if Thea will be comping me a character meal when I complain about the destruction of Artist Point?
Settle down Francis. Take your meds and everything will be ok.
No, no, it won’t. … WDW is an offing disaster. Tom can’t come out and say that because he’ll harm his business. I don’t have such concerns. They are destroying the place and adding crap like Star Wars doesn’t get me hot and bothered. Two dead theme parks. Greenbelts destroyed across property. And resorts that are being dumbed down to appeal to the most basic people. No, nothing is OK.
As a west coaster it’s frustrating to see all the hotel improvements and new properties going in at WDW. It was a bummer when the new potential DVC property in Anaheim was permanently scrapped earlier this week. I hope to see some traction on this in the future!
Thanks, Tom. I’m saddened that this will likely mean the end of the Nature Trail between Fort Wilderness and Wilderness Lodge. One of my best Disney memories was taking the kids there on a “non-parks” day when they were 2 and 4 years old. A fun lunch at WL (Whispering Canyon Cafe), then walking the trail (with kiddos in the stroller) to Fort Wilderness where we did the pony rides, let them run around and play on the playground, and shopped a bit at Settlement Trading Post before strolling back to our car at WL. Much of the walk truly felt like we were in a rural Florida state park and not a mega theme park resort.
I’m sure there will ultimately still be some sort of trail between all 3 resorts but I can’t see any way they’ll be able to maintain the wild/rustic aspect and expanses of tranquil, undisturbed shoreline. It feels like a slap in the face to call this a “nature inspired” resort when you consider how much natural area will be ripped up during construction (beyond the footprint of the resort buildings themselves, there will no doubt be a massive parking lot, bus stations, etc.).
The concept art for the hotel is meh but what I really, really, really hope they do is a nod to River Country in the pool design.
My thought exactly! A great opportunity to incorporate some River Country flavor into the pool.
I hope that they go back to the fun, unique and inspiring themes of there past resorts such as Port Orleans, Wilderness Lodge, Beach Club, etc… All of those older resorts have a unique personality and feel about them that makes me want to try them all. These newer resorts look bland and forgettable. It’s such a stark contrast between the new and old. I hope this new resort is amazing. I also hope that they do NOT build that ugly cube hotel near the Swan and Dolphin.
As soon as I saw your headline, I thought how fitting the site would be for something akin the the Parc Nature Paris that is near Disneyland Paris. Sort of step between Fort Wilderness and a Wilderness Lodge. But alas, when I saw the concept art, it doesn’t look different at all from what the Riviera is looking like. Sigh. So much wasted potential for something great Disney.
I agree Tom! The design is not on par with other projects built in the past like you talked about when Wilderness lodge and Grand Floridian were built. The new hotels or expansions look so uninspiring and makes me think I could be staying at any Marriott or Westin location around the U. S.
This Design I hope changes a lot. It makes me think of what a Starbucks Hotel would look like if they entered the Hotel market!! Not Disney Quality in My opinion!
What I’m more concerned about is the number of rooms that Disney is adding without really exapanding the parks themselves. How many more people do they think they can shove into the exsisting parks?
I agree 100 percent!!
With 2-3 new rides per park that does not increase capacity by much at all.
I think that is one reason Disney is changing all the prices per Day trying to get every day as even as possible but at some point you will start seeing max capacity closures at the gates in the next few years if we don’t have a Recession. You can’t keep having these year over year gains in attendance without hitting max occupancy of the parks.
This is THE problem with Disney over the past 20 years. They don’t build NEW attractions, they just replace or retheme old attractions. Star Wars seems to actually buck this trend SLIGHTLY, but not nearly enough. So tired of seeing overlays, replacements, and “plussing”. Give us some new attractions that add capacity!!!
Considering the fact that Fort Wilderness campsites are booked solid for nearly every day of the year, I think a better use of the old River Country property would have been to expand Fort Wilderness itself, adding many more campsites and maybe another store, or even better, a proper food court. Maybe we should hope that Disney doesn’t turn its eyes toward Fort Wilderness, but since it is nearly impossible to make a reservation there, especially a last-minute reservation, and given the amazing popularity of camping these days, it seems that Disney is missing a golden opportunity, in my humble opinion.
I’m hoping that it will have more mid-century modern touches, per the rendering, than “generic modern.” This actually looks more like Sarasota classical architecture, which started in the mid-century and has a true Florida aesthetic. Many homes/buildings in this style have the courtyard-style entry for an indoor/outdoor living that could provide a great opportunity for a “nature inspired” resort. Moreover, it would fall into the time when Walt was involved in the nature specials, and could harken back to that era for an entire generation (or several) that are unfamiliar with Uncle Walt in their living rooms.
Of course, you could be completely correct in your assertions that this is just another attempt to become more generic. That said, there are several of the refurbished rooms that I love. While I have always loved the great resorts of the 90’s, they were definitely in need of a refresh.
On an entirely separate note, we ate breakfast at Ale & Compass and found their brunch to be an amazing value ($23, includes beverages, an entrée–which are priced $14-$19 each, and the buffet, which features great pastries, fruit, cheeses, charcuterie, smoked salmon, and smoked trout dip… no gross eggs here!). I know you weren’t big on the bland them, but seriously this brunch was enough for two meals for my family and was an absolute delight.
I hope you’re right about the design influences. The concept art isn’t really much to go on either way–it could be more stylized.
I’d say I’m about 50/50 on the recent refurbs/reimaginings. Some have been well done, others have been boring. They all have been necessary from a refresh perspective. What worries me is the inconsistency of those, coupled with the uninspired look of the recent (current) new builds.
Hopefully your optimism is well placed!
I sincerely hope that concept art is a placeholder because it looks more like “Built next to O’Hare Airport amongst the fields of Concrete” than “nature-inspired”. Unfortunately I’m in agreement with your cynicism – Fort Wilderness has been allowed to exist in a semi-detached state for some time now, but with the ever-expanding eyes of ‘prosperity’ and ‘opportunity’ turning its way, that semi-detached state is likely to quickly become a thing of the past.
Hopefully we can both be surprised at an ultimate design that is innovative, imaginative, and actually carries out the proposed theme.
Our favorite place to stay at WDW are the Cabins at the Campground. I couldn’t agree with you more in hoping that Disney does not damage that resort for the sake of something shiny and new.
I stayed at Ft. Wilderness with my family on my first Disney trip in 1978 and remember River Country. I’ve continued to love Ft. Wilderness ever since. I want to give Disney the benefit of the doubt but I’m nervous with Disney’s track record on other recent projects. I agree that Ft. Wilderness has largely felt untouched and that’s a lot of what I like about it. It’s quiet, it has a community feel, and the natural setting are what keep me coming back. I hope they don’t take that away for another bland DVC resort.
You described exactly what we love best about Fort Wilderness – it seems as if it’s remained almost untouched since it first opened. The true spirit of Disney World. There’s a little bit of Walt there, if one can presume to say such a thing. My dad camped there as a teenager, I first went there as a 20-something, and now plan to take my own kids. There’s nothing else like it at WDW!
Hopefully Disney gets the message and hires architects that can blend their greed with nature.